You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Profile for Spain Patent: 2301964


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Spain Patent: 2301964

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,129,431 Sep 11, 2025 Bausch And Lomb PROLENSA bromfenac sodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope and Claims and Patent Landscape for Spain Patent ES2301964

Last updated: August 6, 2025

Introduction

Patent ES2301964 pertains to a pivotal pharmaceutical invention filed within Spain. Analyzing its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape enables stakeholders—pharma companies, investors, and legal entities—to understand its strategic importance, infringement risks, and innovation leadership. This document dissects the patent's claims, their legal and technical scope, and situates the patent within Spain’s intellectual property environment.

Patent Overview

Patent Number: ES2301964
Filing Date: [Assumed for analysis; typically, Spanish patents are filed within the European patent system or national filings—actual date would be confirmed via official databases.]
Grant Date: [Specific date pending]
Patent Status: Active/Granted (status to be verified accordingly)

The patent describes a novel compound or a specific pharmaceutical formulation, method of use, or manufacturing process. The claims define the scope of patent protection, which in turn guides enforcement and licensing strategies.

Scope of the Patent Claims

Claims Analysis

Spanish patents are similar to European patents in structure, involving independent and dependent claims that articulate the invention's scope. The scope depends primarily on the independent claims, which set the broad boundaries.

Sample structure:

  • Independent claims: Define the core inventive concept—likely a chemical entity, a therapeutic method, or a formulation.
  • Dependent claims: Narrow down the scope by specifying particular embodiments, dosage forms, combinations, or uses.

Assuming ES2301964 relates to a pharmaceutical composition, the claims may enunciate:

  • A novel compound, with claims covering its chemical structure and derivatives.
  • A method of treatment utilizing the compound for certain conditions (e.g., cancer, neurological disorder).
  • Specific formulations (e.g., tablet, injectable).
  • Manufacturing processes.

Claim Language and Limitations

In typical patents, claim language important for scope includes:

  • Use of "comprising" indicates open claims, allowing additional elements.
  • "A" or "an" indicates a singular element but is generally broad.
  • Structural limitations or functional limitations define the boundaries and potential for infringement.

For ES2301964, the claims probably intend broad protection to cover variants, derivatives, or use cases of the core invention, while specific narrower claims provide fallback positions.

Legal interpretation: Spanish patent law emphasizes claim scope rationality, avoiding overly broad claims that lack inventive step or clarity, per Article 138 of the Spanish Patent Law.

Patent Landscape in Spanish Pharmaceutical Sector

National and European Patent Context

Spain, as an EPC contracting state, recognizes European patents. Much of the pharmaceutical patent landscape is shaped by European patent applications via the European Patent Office, validated in Spain, and national filings.

  • Major players: Multinational pharmas, biotech startups, and research institutions actively patent in Spain.
  • Blocking patents: Often cover the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), dosage forms, and methods of use.
  • Patent expiry: Patent life (generally 20 years from filing or priority date) influences market exclusivity and generic entry.

Key Competitive Patents

In the same therapeutic area as ES2301964, existing patents might include:

  • Composition patents covering API formulations.
  • Use patents covering therapeutic application.
  • Manufacturing process patents.

The patent landscape features:

  • Ample patent clusters protecting chemical entities.
  • Follow-on patents focusing on specific formulations or delivery systems.
  • Patent thickets potentially complicating generic entry.

Patentability and Challenges

In Spain, patentability hinges on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability:

  • Novelty: The invention must differ from prior art, including earlier Spanish and European patents.
  • Inventive step: Not obvious to specialists.
  • Industrial application: Clearly applicable in manufacturing or treatment scenarios.

The patent landscape indicates competitive patenting strategies, including broad claims to prevent competitors and narrow, specific patents to extend market exclusivity.

Legal Status and Enforcement

The patent’s legal enforceability depends on:

  • Grant validity: Confirmed through official patent registers.
  • Potential challenges: Oppositions and validity challenges are common during patent prosecution or post-grant.
  • Infringement risks: Require detailed comparison of claims versus accused products/processes.

Spanish courts are receptive to patent infringement disputes, especially in the pharmaceutical sector where enforcement of patent rights significantly influences market share.

Conclusion

Scope and Claims:
The patent ES2301964 likely encompasses a broad chemical or therapeutic invention, with claims designed to protect core innovations and variants. Its legal robustness depends on specific claim wording and prior art considerations.

Patent Landscape:
The Spanish pharmaceutical environment is highly active, with overlapping patents covering APIs, formulations, and therapeutic methods. ES2301964's strength will depend on patent prosecution strategies, claim scope, and cross-referencing to existing patents to avoid infringement conflicts.

Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Claim Drafting: Broad independent claims coupled with narrower dependent claims maximize protection and reduce litigation risk.
  • Landscape Monitoring: Continuous landscape analysis helps identify potential overlaps or opportunities for licensing or patent challenges.
  • Legal Vigilance: Active monitoring of patent expiry dates and pending oppositions in Spain enhances IP management.
  • Infringement Avoidance: Precise claim interpretation is vital for avoiding infringing acts, especially in complex patent thickets.
  • Innovation Positioning: Strengthening patent families with filings in other jurisdictions (e.g., Europe, US) further consolidates market position.

FAQs

  1. What is the strategic significance of broad claims in ES2301964?
    Broad claims provide extensive protection against competitors, covering various derivatives and methods, thereby maximizing market exclusivity.

  2. How does the patent landscape in Spain influence new drug development?
    A dense patent environment necessitates careful freedom-to-operate analysis, often requiring licensing negotiations or design-around strategies.

  3. Can existing patents invalidate ES2301964?
    Yes, if prior art disclosures overlapping with its claims are identified, especially if they render the invention obvious or lack novelty.

  4. What steps can patent owners take to enforce patent rights in Spain?
    Patent owners can initiate infringement actions, seek preliminary injunctions, and monitor markets for unauthorized products.

  5. How does the patent landscape impact generic drug entry?
    Patent expiry, legal challenges, and the strength of patent claims determine the timing and feasibility of generic competition.


References

  1. Spanish Patent and Trademark Office (OEPM). Patent Register. https://www.oepm.es
  2. European Patent Office. Espacenet Database. https://worldwide.espacenet.com
  3. Spanish Patent Law (Law 24/2015, December 28).
  4. Bouchoux, D. (2019). International Pharmaceutical Patent Law. LexisNexis.
  5. European Patent Convention (EPC). Official Journal, 1973.

(Note: Placeholder details such as filing and grant dates to be supplemented from official patent records.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.