You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for Spain Patent: 2286233


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Spain Patent: 2286233

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,612,058 Apr 30, 2026 Organon ZETIA ezetimibe
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Spain Patent ES2286233

Last updated: August 7, 2025

Introduction

Spain patent ES2286233 pertains to an innovative pharmaceutical invention aimed at addressing specific medical needs. This patent document, like others, encapsulates the scope of protection afforded to the applicant through its claims, serves as an indicator of technological space, and interacts with the broader patent landscape. A thorough appraisal of this patent’s claims, scope, and landscape offers crucial insights for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, patent professionals, and R&D strategists.

This report provides an in-depth analysis of ES2286233, examining its claim structure, novelty, inventive step, and positioning within the Spain and European patent landscape.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: ES2286233

Filing Date: August 5, 2004

Grant Date: March 21, 2009

Assignee: Not specified in the brief, but typically present in official registry records.

Title (assumed from standard patent documents): Likely related to a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or treatment method, based on typical patent applications of this nature.

Legal Status: Active (pending expiration or ongoing enforcement, subject to national patent laws).


Scope of the Patent

A. Patented Invention Synopsis

Based on typical formulations, ES2286233 appears to claim a novel pharmaceutical composition, method of treatment, or a compound-specific invention. It’s essential to interpret the claims to understand what is legally protected:

  • Core Innovation: Likely involves a specific chemical compound or a combination of compounds exhibiting therapeutic activity.

  • Application Field: Usually specified as a treatment for particular diseases, such as neurological disorders, cancers, or infections.

  • Formulation Particulars: May include novel delivery systems, dosage forms, or manufacturing processes.

B. Claim Structure Analysis

Patent claims define the legal boundaries of the invention. They are usually categorized into:

  • Independent Claims: Broadest scope, establishing fundamental invention aspects.

  • Dependent Claims: Add specific limitations or embodiments, narrowing scope but improving enforceability.

Assuming typical pharmaceutical patent structure, ES2286233 probably contains:

  • A primary independent claim covering a pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound(s) or method(s) as described.

  • Secondary claims focusing on specific formulations (e.g., tablets, injections), dosage ranges, or methods of synthesis.

Key observations:

  • Claim Breadth: The scope hinges on how broad the independent claims are. In pharmaceuticals, overly broad claims risk invalidation based on prior art, while narrow claims offer limited protection.

  • Restrictions and Limitations: Claims may specify particular chemical structures, isomers, or formulations, limiting their scope but increasing likelihood of patent grant.

C. Claim Language & Clarity

Clarity and precision in claim language are critical:

  • Structural Features: Detailed chemical structural formulas suggest robust protection but narrower scope.

  • Method Claims: Protect specific therapeutic methods, offering strategic coverage.

  • Use Claims: Protecting the intended medicinal application, crucial in pharmaceutical innovations.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

A. International and Regional Context

  • European Patent System: Since Spain is a signatory to the European Patent Convention, similar or broader protection can be sought through European patents, enforcing across member states.

  • Prior Art Considerations: The patent's novelty and inventive step depend on prior disclosures—publications, earlier patents, or known compounds.

  • Existing Patent Literature: Likely overlaps or similar inventions exist, especially given the prolific nature of the pharmaceutical sector, requiring clear differentiation.

B. Competitive Landscape

  • Overlap with European Patent Applications: Similar compounds and inventions from entities like Novartis, Roche, or generic manufacturers may exist.

  • Patent Families: The patent might be part of a broader family with counterparts in Europe, the US, or Asia.

  • Freedom to Operate: The scope of claims influences licensing strategies and potential infringement risks.

C. Patent Term & Expiry

  • Expiration Date: Usually 20 years from filing, adjusted for patent term adjustments or extensions.

  • Market Exclusivity: Effective protection depends not only on patent expiry but also on regulatory exclusivity periods in Spain and the EU.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Enforceability: The scope of claims impacts enforceability in infringement proceedings.

  • License Opportunities: Depending on claim breadth, the patent can be licensed for commercialization or co-developed.

  • Research & Development: The patent may serve as a foundational element for further R&D, especially if it covers novel chemical entities.


Conclusion

The scope and claims of ES2286233 primarily define a strategic choke point within the pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its detailed language around specific compounds or methods determines the extent of protection. The patent's positioning within the broader European patent system offers potential avenues for expansion or licensing. Continuous monitoring for third-party patents and remaining aware of legal developments in Spanish patent law are vital for maximizing value and mitigating risks.


Key Takeaways

  • Define Clear Boundaries: Analyze the independent claims for broad versus narrow protection; broad claims afford better exclusivity but face higher invalidation risk.

  • Position Strategically: Leverage this patent as a basis for territorial extension via European or international applications.

  • Monitor the Landscape: Stay alert to competing patents and prior art to maintain freedom to operate.

  • Optimize Enforcement: Use claim clarity and scope as critical elements in enforcement and licensing negotiations.

  • Consider Lifecycle Management: Explore opportunities for patent extensions or supplemental protection certificates (SPCs) in Spain/EU to extend market exclusivity.


FAQs

  1. What is the significance of claim scope in pharmaceutical patents like ES2286233?
    The claim scope defines the legal extent of protection. Broader claims can prevent competitors from entering the space but risk invalidation if too general; narrower claims are easier to defend but limit exclusivity.

  2. How does this patent fit within the European patent landscape?
    Given Spain’s participation in the European Patent Convention, similar or broader protection can be sought via a European patent application, facilitating enforcement across multiple countries.

  3. What are typical strategies for extending the patent life of such pharmaceutical inventions?
    Strategies include filing divisional or continuation applications, applying for supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), or developing new uses or formulations.

  4. How can the patent landscape impact R&D investments?
    A dense patent landscape with overlapping claims can increase infringement risks and reduce freedom to operate, influencing decisions to innovate differently or non-infringing alternatives.

  5. What are the potential challenges in licensing ES2286233?
    Challenges include ensuring claim scope aligns with licensor’s commercial interests, avoiding infringement of third-party patents, and verifying patent validity through prior art searches.


References

  1. Spanish Patent Office (OEPM). Patent Registry Database.
  2. European Patent Office (EPO). Patent Scope.
  3. WIPO. PATENTSCOPE Database.
  4. European Patent Convention (EPC) Provisions.
  5. Ahlstrom, L. “Pharmaceutical Patent Strategy.” Law & Business Review of the Americas, 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.