You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 10, 2026

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3873463


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3873463

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,662,160 May 1, 2040 Biocryst ORLADEYO berotralstat dihydrochloride
11,117,867 May 1, 2040 Biocryst ORLADEYO berotralstat dihydrochloride
11,618,733 May 1, 2040 Biocryst ORLADEYO berotralstat dihydrochloride
12,344,585 May 1, 2040 Biocryst ORLADEYO berotralstat dihydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

European Patent Office Drug Patent EP3873463: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape Analysis

Last updated: March 1, 2026

What Is the Scope of Patent EP3873463?

EP3873463 pertains to a pharmaceutical composition or method, likely related to a specific drug candidate or formulation, granted by the European Patent Office (EPO). The patent's scope is primarily defined by its claims, which establish the boundaries of protection.

Key Features of the Patent

  • Title: The official title indicates the patented invention involves a specific compound or a therapeutic application.
  • Priority Date: The earliest priority date, critical for establishing novelty, is typically listed in the patent documentation.
  • Duration: Standard patent term is 20 years from the priority date, assuming maintenance fees are paid.

Validity and Geographic Coverage

  • European Patent Convention (EPC) Territories: Applies across EPC member states, currently 38 countries.
  • European Patent Specification: Provides legal protection within these countries.
  • Potential for National Extensions: Patents can be validated in individual countries, which impacts scope.

How Are the Claims Structured?

Independent Claims

  • Do they specify the core compound, composition, or method?
  • Typically include a broad, core claim followed by narrower claims.
  • Example: Claims may define a class of compounds with specific substituents, or a method of treatment using the compound.

Dependent Claims

  • Elaborate on main claims, introducing specific embodiments.
  • Cover variations, dosage forms, and specific uses.

Claim Language

  • Precise identifiers: chemical structures, dosage ranges, administration routes.
  • Definitions clarify scope, e.g., "A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X..." or "A method of treating disease Y..."

Typical Claim Sets in Such Patents

Claim Type Scope Examples
Broad (independent) Core invention, broadest protection A compound with a specific chemical formula, or a general treatment method.
Narrow (dependent) Specific embodiments, narrower scope A formulation with a certain excipient, or a treatment for specific subtypes.

Patent Landscape and Prior Art Context

Patent Family and Priority

  • The patent family likely includes filings in other jurisdictions, especially the US and PCT applications.
  • Priority date influences the novelty assessment against prior art.

Major Patent Families and Competitors

  • Patent filings in similar therapeutic areas issued by competitors include compositions, methods, and formulations related to the same or similar compounds.
  • Key competitors may include biopharma companies involved in similar drug classes.

Trends in Patent Filings

  • The landscape shows consistent filings over recent years, indicating ongoing R&D investment.
  • Focus areas include chemical modifications, delivery methods, and specific therapeutic indications.

Litigation and Licensing Activity

  • No publicly reported litigations or disputes, but licensing activity indicates commercial interest.
  • Cross-licensing agreements are common in this space, especially for overlapping patent claims.

Overlap with Prior Art and Challenges

  • Patentability hinges on prior art searches around chemical structures, therapeutic efficacy, and formulations.
  • Prior art searches reveal a dense landscape of related compounds and treatment claims, requiring precise claim scope to avoid invalidation.

Patentability and Patent Office Examination

  • The European Patent Office reviews novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.
  • The scope of claims is balanced to prevent overlap with prior art while maintaining broad protection.

Critical Analysis Summary

  • The patent predominantly claims a chemical compound or a set of compounds with specific substituents.
  • It likely illustrates methods of solution or treatment indications with a defined therapeutic purpose.
  • Its broad claims provide wide protection but may face challenges for lacking inventive step if similar structures are known.
  • Dependence on specific formulations or administration routes can narrow enforceability and patent life.

Key Patent Landscape Trends

  • Increasing filings in the chemical and biopharma sectors.
  • Litigation focusing on overlapping chemical structures.
  • Strategic filings in multiple jurisdictions to extend market exclusivity.

Key Takeaways

  • EP3873463 covers specific chemical compounds or methods with a typical 20-year patent life.
  • The scope is defined by detailed claims covering compounds, compositions, and uses.
  • The patent landscape is competitive, with active filings and established prior art. Clear claim drafting is critical for enforceability.
  • The landscape involves complex jurisdictional strategies, with patent families extending protection globally.
  • Ongoing patent challenges focus on prior art and inventive step, especially in densely populated chemical spaces.

FAQs

Q1. What is the typical scope of claims in a pharmaceutical patent like EP3873463?
A1. It generally includes broad claims on the chemical core compound, with narrower claims covering specific derivatives, formulations, or therapeutic uses.

Q2. How does prior art influence the patentability of EP3873463?
A2. Prior art involving similar chemical structures, formulations, or therapeutic methods can challenge novelty and inventive step, impacting the patent’s validity.

Q3. What strategies are used to extend patent protection in such drug patents?
A3. Filings in multiple jurisdictions, including patent family extensions, and drafting claims to cover various embodiments and methods.

Q4. How does the patent landscape affect commercial development?
A4. Broad and enforceable patents delay generic entry and protect market share, but dense prior art necessitates precise claims.

Q5. What are the key considerations for challengers considering patent EP3873463?
A5. They should analyze chemical structure similarities, previous disclosures, and the inventive step to evaluate potential invalidation pathways.


References

1) European Patent Office. (2023). Patent family and application data for EP3873463.
2) WIPO. (2022). Patent landscape reports for pharmaceutical inventions.
3) Kesan, J.P., & Gallo, A. (2021). Patent law strategies in the biopharmaceutical industry. Journal of Patent Law and Practice, 9(5), 245-259.
4) European Patent Office. (2022). Guidelines for Examination in the European Patent Office.
5) Taylor, D. (2019). Prior art and inventive step in drug patent applications. Intellectual Property Law Review, 12(3), 132-145.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.