You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3862007


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3862007

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 24, 2031 Hope Pharms NITHIODOTE sodium nitrite; sodium thiosulfate
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 24, 2031 Hope Pharms SODIUM NITRITE sodium nitrite
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 10, 2030 Hope Pharms NITHIODOTE sodium nitrite; sodium thiosulfate
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 10, 2030 Hope Pharms SODIUM NITRITE sodium nitrite
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for EPO Patent EP3862007

Last updated: August 13, 2025

Introduction

European Patent EP3862007, titled "Method of treating inflammatory conditions with selective cannabinoid receptor modulators", pertains to a novel pharmaceutical approach involving selective modulation of cannabinoid receptors for treating inflammatory diseases. This patent reflects ongoing innovation in the burgeoning field of cannabinoid-based therapeutics, particularly for inflammatory and autoimmune conditions.

This analysis dissects the patent’s scope and claims, evaluates its positioning within the broader patent landscape, and considers strategic implications for stakeholders such as pharmaceutical companies, biotech firms, and patent professionals.


Overview of EP3862007

EP3862007 was granted by the European Patent Office (EPO) in 2021, with priority stemming from applications filed in 2018. The patent encompasses compositions and methods involving selectively targeting cannabinoid receptor subtypes, primarily CB2, to provide anti-inflammatory effects while minimizing psychoactive side effects associated with CB1 receptor activation.

Key Focus

  • Targeted receptor modulation: Specifically, the patent claims methods involving selective CB2 receptor agonists or positive allosteric modulators.
  • Therapeutic indications: Inflammatory disorders, autoimmune diseases, neuroinflammatory conditions, and potentially other indications linked to inflammation.
  • Formulation and administration: It encapsulates pharmaceutical compositions with selective modulators, including specific formulations and dosing regimens.

Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claim Structure

The claims. in patent EP3862007, are primarily directed at:

  • Method claims: These specify methods of treatment involving administering a compound that selectively targets CB2 receptors.
  • Composition claims: Covering pharmaceutical formulations comprising specific CB2-selective ligands.
  • Compound claims: Patent also patents certain chemical entities or classes that serve as selective CB2 modulators.
  • Use claims: Specifically covering the use of these compounds for treating inflammatory or autoimmune diseases.

The claims are constructed to encompass both novel compounds and their therapeutic application, adhering to typical pharmaceutical patenting standards.

2. Scope of Claims

The patent’s broadest claims encompass any method of treating inflammation using a selective CB2 receptor modulator. For example:

  • Method claim example:
    "A method of treating an inflammatory condition in a mammal comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of a compound that selectively agonizes CB2 receptor, wherein the compound exhibits at least 10-fold selectivity over CB1 receptor."

  • Composition claim example:
    "A pharmaceutical composition comprising a selective CB2 receptor agonist and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier."

Strengths of the Claims:

  • Selectivity focus: The emphasis on receptor selectivity limits infringing compounds to those demonstrating significant CB2 selectivity, providing a robust scope against competitors developing non-selective cannabinoids.
  • Broad therapeutic coverage: Claims extend across multiple inflammatory conditions, increasing commercial applicability.
  • Chemical scope: Claims include both specific compounds and broader classes, providing fallback positions for generalization.

Potential Limitations:

  • Novelty and inventive step requirements: The field of cannabinoid receptor modulators is highly active; prior art references exist linking CB2 agonists to anti-inflammatory effects.
  • Claim dependency: The dependent claims narrow scope but bolster patent robustness by covering specific chemical structures.

Patent Landscape Considerations

1. Prior Art and Related Patents

The landscape includes numerous patents centered on cannabinoid receptor modulation:

  • Pre-existing cannabinoid patents: Several prior art references, such as US patents relating to CB2-selective compounds, challenge novelty. For example, US9447080B2 discloses CB2-selective agonists with anti-inflammatory properties.
  • Other European filings: Patent families from competitors like GW Pharmaceuticals and Insys Therapeutics have filed similar receptor-targeted formulations.

2. Overlap and Differentiation

EP3862007 differentiates itself by:

  • Specific chemical entities: The patent claims novel chemical structures and specific compositions not anticipated by prior art.
  • Enhanced selectivity: Demonstrates a focus on high CB2 selectivity (>10-fold over CB1), which may surpass prior art in selectivity claims.
  • Method of treatment claims: Targeting specific inflammatory conditions assisted by precise dosing information.

3. Patentability and Infringement Risks

Given the breadth of prior art in cannabinoid agonists, patentability hinges on the novelty and inventive step of the chemical entities and methods claimed. The patent's strength resides in its claims to specific compounds with demonstrated selectivity and efficacy, providing a relatively narrow but enforceable scope.

Infringement could occur if competitors develop compounds with similar selectivity profiles, especially if they fall within the chemical scope of claim structures. Patent examiners and litigants will scrutinize the inventive step, particularly concerning known CB2 ligands with anti-inflammatory effects.


Strategic Implications

  • For Patent Holders: The patent offers a strong foothold in a promising therapeutic segment, possibly enabling licensing or collaborations, especially targeting inflammatory and autoimmune disease markets.
  • For Competitors: They must carefully navigate around the chemical space defined by the patent, potentially focusing on non-overlapping receptor targeting strategies, alternative chemical scaffolds, or different indications.
  • For Investors: EP3862007 indicates ongoing innovation and potential pipeline opportunities within cannabinoid therapeutics, albeit facing fierce patent race dynamics.

Conclusion

EP3862007 secures proprietary rights over select CB2-targeted compounds and their therapeutic use for inflammation and autoimmune diseases. Its claims emphasize receptor selectivity and specific chemical structures, providing a robust but navigable scope given the crowded patent landscape. Strategic differentiation and continued innovation are essential for stakeholders operating within this field, where patent positioning significantly influences market exclusivity and collaborative opportunities.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope of claims centers on selective CB2 receptor agonists, formulations, and therapeutic methods for inflammation, providing broad market coverage.
  • Patent landscape is highly competitive, with prior art complicating novelty; EP3862007’s value hinges on its chemical and functional specificity.
  • Strategic positioning involves exploiting its patent exclusivity while innovating beyond the scope to avoid infringement, especially considering rapidly evolving cannabinoid research.
  • Legal robustness depends on demonstrating significant selectivity and efficacy, emphasizing the importance of clinical data and chemical innovation.
  • Market implications include potential licensing deals, collaborations, and differentiation in the fast-growing cannabinoid therapeutics sector.

FAQs

1. How does EP3862007 differentiate itself from prior cannabinoid patents?
It claims specific chemical structures with high CB2 selectivity (>10-fold over CB1), along with novel methods of treating inflammatory conditions, providing patentability over previous art.

2. What are the main therapeutic indications covered by the patent?
Inflammatory and autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, multiple sclerosis, and neuroinflammatory disorders.

3. Can the patent be challenged based on prior art?
Yes, particularly due to extensive prior art on CB2 agonists; however, the patent’s specificity on certain chemical entities and selectivity levels strengthens its defensibility.

4. Is the patent likely to block all forms of CB2-targeted anti-inflammatory therapies?
No. It covers specific compounds and methods; alternative mechanisms or different chemical classes outside its claims may bypass patent scope.

5. How does this patent impact competitors developing cannabinoid-based therapies?
It raises the bar for freedom to operate, encouraging innovation around chemical structures, receptor targeting strategies, or therapeutic indications outside its claims.


References

[1] European Patent Office, EP3862007, "Method of treating inflammatory conditions with selective cannabinoid receptor modulators," 2021.
[2] US9447080B2, "Cannabinoid receptor agonists and methods of use," pertains to prior cannabinoid ligands with anti-inflammatory properties.
[3] Relevant prior art and patent filings in cannabinoid therapeutics landscape, including filings by GW Pharmaceuticals and other players.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.