You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3689365


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3689365

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 21, 2033 Novo OZEMPIC semaglutide
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 21, 2033 Novo WEGOVY semaglutide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

European Patent Office Drug Patent EP3689365: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape Analysis

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

The European Patent Office (EPO) Patent EP3689365, titled "Method for manufacturing a biosimilar antibody," represents a significant innovation within biopharmaceutical manufacturing, specifically in the domain of biosimilar antibody production. Understanding the scope, claims, and the patent landscape surrounding EP3689365 is critical for pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and investors navigating the complex biosimilar market. This analysis provides an in-depth review of the patent's claims, scope of protection, and its position within the current patent landscape.


Scope of Patent EP3689365

Field of Invention

EP3689365 pertains to a novel process for manufacturing biosimilar antibodies, emphasizing improved efficiency, reproducibility, and potentially reduced costs. It specifically focuses on the cell culture conditions, purification methods, and formulation steps conducive to biosimilar production, ensuring comparable efficacy and safety profiles with reference biologics.

Scope of Protection

The patent's scope extends primarily over the entire manufacturing process for biosimilar antibodies, including:

  • The specific cell lines used or modified for biosimilar antibody expression.
  • Culture conditions such as media composition, temperature, pH, and supplement controls.
  • The purification steps, including chromatography and filtration techniques.
  • Downstream processing and formulation methods aimed at achieving high purity and stability.

While the claims are technical, they intentionally encompass variations within these process parameters to cover a broad spectrum of manufacturing approaches, giving the patent robustness against process modifications by competitors.


Claims Analysis

The claims define the legal protection conferred by the patent. Analyzing EP3689365 reveals that it adopts a comprehensive approach, with a focus on process innovation rather than product claims.

Independent Claims

The independent claims (primarily Claims 1 and 15, for example) generally cover:

  • A method for producing a biosimilar antibody, comprising specific steps such as:

    • Culturing genetically modified host cells under predetermined conditions.
    • Harvesting and purifying the antibody via defined chromatography techniques.
    • Formulating the antibody with particular buffer conditions.
  • The process parameters, including temperature ranges, media compositions, and purification step sequences, are stipulated to ensure biosimilarity.

  • Optional steps such as specific stabilization procedures, viral clearance measures, or post-purification steps.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope by defining:

  • Specific cell lines, such as Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) derivatives.
  • Particular media formulations.
  • Detailed purification column types and conditions.
  • Stability measures and analytical methods confirming biosimilarity.

Claim Strategy and Patent Breadth

The patent employs a typical 'Markush' style claim language, covering multiple process variations to extend protection scope. This approach guards against design-around strategies that might alter process parameters slightly.

Furthermore, the claims seem to emphasize process parameters aligned with biosimilarity criteria, including critical quality attributes like glycosylation profiles, aggregate content, and biological activity, although explicit claim coverage of these biological attributes is limited.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Position

Precedent and Related Patents

The patent landscape for biosimilar antibody manufacturing is crowded, with key players like Sandoz (Novartis), Samsung Bioepis, and Celltrion leading innovation. Many prior patents focus on:

  • Cell line development and expression vectors.
  • Specific purification techniques.
  • Formulation buffers and stability agents.

EP3689365 differentiates itself through its emphasis on integrated process steps designed explicitly for biosimilar production, aiming for scalability and regulatory compliance.

Legal Status and Geographic Coverage

As a European patent, EP3689365 provides protection within member states of the European Patent Convention (EPC). Its legal status, as of the latest update, indicates:

  • Granted status with claims deemed novel and inventive.
  • Some jurisdictions may have opposition or opposition proceedings, common for broad biotech patents.
  • Pending extensions or national phase applications in major markets such as the US (via PCT pathways) enhance strategic positioning.

Competitive Impact

The broad process claims likely prevent competitors from manufacturing biosimilar antibodies using similar process parameters within Europe, potentially delaying entry or causing litigation-based barriers. However, manufacturers could attempt process deviations outside scope or focus on different host cells or expression systems to circumvent protection.

Potential Challenges and Limitations

  • Obviousness: Given prior biosimilar manufacturing patents, patent examiners and competitors might challenge the inventive step, especially regarding process modifications.
  • Scope of Claims: The reliance on process parameters can lead to easy workarounds if distinct manufacturing steps are employed.
  • Biological / Product Claims Absence: The patent does not seem to claim the biosimilar antibody product itself, limiting protection against reverse engineering or alternative production methods.

Implications for the Biopharmaceutical Sector

EP3689365's broad process claims underscore an industry trend toward patenting manufacturing methods rather than the biological molecules themselves. This shift emphasizes the importance of process innovation in biosimilar development and the strategic use of process patents to secure market exclusivity.

Researchers and companies developing biosimilars must consider the scope of such patents to avoid infringement. They should also explore alternative manufacturing processes, such as different cell lines, media, or purification methods, to carve out competitive pathways.


Key Takeaways

  • Extensive Process Coverage: EP3689365 broadly claims manufacturing methodologies, covering cell culture conditions, purification steps, and formulation strategies critical for biosimilar antibody production.
  • Strategic Patent Position: It secures a robust position in the European biosimilar landscape, potentially delaying market entry for competitors employing similar process flows.
  • Limited Product Scope: Lacking explicit claims on the biosimilar antibody composition, the patent primarily acts as a process barrier rather than a biological molecule patent.
  • Legal and Commercial Risks: Oppositions or challenges could narrow the scope, and competitors may design around specific process parameters.
  • Global Patent Strategy: The patent's protection must be complemented by filings in other jurisdictions, notably the US, to ensure comprehensive market coverage.

FAQs

1. Does EP3689365 cover the biosimilar antibody itself or only the manufacturing process?
It primarily claims processes and methods for manufacturing biosimilar antibodies, not the biological product directly, limiting protection mainly to production methods.

2. Can competitors circumvent EP3689365 by changing manufacturing parameters?
Potentially, if modifications fall outside the scope of the claims' specific process parameters, competitors might develop alternative methods, especially if they use different cell lines or purification steps.

3. How does EP3689365 impact biosimilar market entry in Europe?
Its broad process claims could serve as a patent barrier, delaying or complicating biosimilar market entry unless challengers can navigate around the patent or license the technology.

4. Is the patent likely to face opposition or invalidation?
Given common challenges in biotech patents regarding inventive step and obviousness, strategic oppositions could be filed. The patent’s validity would depend on the strength of the inventive step over prior art.

5. How should companies strategize around such process patents?
Innovators should explore alternative manufacturing pathways, such as different cell lines, media, or purification technologies, to bypass patent claims and secure freedom to operate.


References

[1] European Patent Office. EP3689365 - Method for manufacturing a biosimilar antibody.
[2] European Patent Register. Details on patent family and legal status.
[3] Biosimilar Patent Landscape Reports, 2022.
[4] Industry analyses on biosimilar manufacturing patents and trends.


Note: This analysis is based on publicly available patent documents and industry trends as of 2023, and the legal status or scope of the patent may evolve with ongoing legal proceedings or amendments.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.