You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3638240


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3638240

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,646,484 Jun 22, 2038 Indivior SUBLOCADE buprenorphine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent Office Patent EP3638240

Last updated: August 7, 2025


Introduction

European Patent Office (EPO) patent EP3638240 pertains to innovative developments within the pharmaceutical domain. This patent grants exclusive rights, offering a strategic advantage within the competitive landscape of drug development. This analysis dissects the scope and claims, evaluates the overarching patent landscape, and details the implications for stakeholders in the pharmaceutical industry.


Patent Overview: EP3638240

EP3638240 was filed with the European Patent Office, indicating a focus on novel compounds, formulations, or methods related to drug delivery, manufacturing, or therapeutic applications. While specific technical disclosures are detailed within the patent files, the core aspects typically involve:

  • Innovative chemical entities or derivatives
  • Specific formulations enhancing stability, bioavailability, or targeting
  • Methodologies for synthesis or administration

The patent's scope hinges on its claims, which define the boundaries of legal protection.


Scope of EP3638240

The scope of a patent fundamentally determines its commercial utility and competitive barrier. For EP3638240, the scope encompasses:

  • Chemical claims that cover particular molecular structures or derivatives.
  • Process claims detailing specific manufacturing methods.
  • Use claims targeting therapeutic or diagnostic applications the patent aims to protect.

Based on standard European patent language, the claims likely include:

  • Broad apparatus or method claims that define a general class of compounds or techniques.
  • Dependent claims that specify particular embodiments, such as specific substitutions or configurations.
  • Functional claims covering mechanisms or effects, e.g., improved bioavailability.

The claims' breadth influences their enforceability. Excessively broad claims risk invalidation on grounds of added matter or lack of novelty, whereas narrow claims may invite workarounds.


Analysis of the Claims

1. Composition Claims:

Most drug patents protect a core chemical entity or a novel combination of active ingredients. For EP3638240, the composition claims may specify:

  • Molecular formulae with substituted groups.
  • Pharmacokinetic properties improving absorption or reducing side effects.
  • Formulation specifics, such as nanoparticles, liposomes, or sustained-release matrices.

2. Method Claims:

These often describe:

  • Synthesis procedures enabling reproducibility.
  • Methods for delivering the drug effectively (e.g., oral, injectable).
  • Therapeutic protocols, such as dosing schedules or combination therapies.

3. Use Claims:

Use claims tend to protect:

  • Treatment of specific conditions or diseases.
  • Targeted delivery to particular tissues or cells.

4. Patentable Innovation:

The innovation likely lies in a:

  • Novel chemical scaffold with improved efficacy.
  • Unique formulation enhancing drug stability or reducing toxicity.
  • Efficient synthesis pathway reducing costs or environmental impact.

Claim scope considerations:

  • Novelty and non-obviousness are critical. The claims should distinguish this compound or method from prior art, including existing drugs and patents.
  • Priority claims may link the patent to earlier filings, providing additional novelty or inventive step considerations.

Patent Landscape and Related Innovations

The patent landscape surrounding EP3638240 involves:

  • Prior art references: Public disclosures of similar compounds or formulations.
  • Competitor patents: Compounds or methods with overlapping claims.
  • Patent families: Related patents filed nationally and internationally, expanding protective scope.

Relevant patent classifications:

  • C07D, A61K: Common classes for chemical compounds and medicinal preparations.
  • Filing strategy: Multiple jurisdictions to maximize territorial coverage.

Landscape analysis reveals:

  • Multiple patents targeting similar chemical scaffolds, suggesting a competitive area.
  • Freedom-to-operate considerations: The patent’s claims should be assessed against prior art to avoid infringement.

Legal and market implications:

  • Potential patent thicket, challenging newcomers.
  • Oppositions and validity challenges may emerge, especially if the claims are broad.

Strategic Implications for Industry Stakeholders

1. Patent Strength and Market Exclusivity

The patent’s scope, if sufficiently broad, extends market exclusivity, enabling:

  • Pricing power
  • Investment in commercialization
  • Attractiveness for licensing agreements

2. Risk Management

Stakeholders must navigate:

  • Potential infringement issues due to overlapping patents.
  • Patent challenge risks—validity or inventive step disputes.

3. R&D and Innovation

The patent landscape guides:

  • Future R&D efforts to avoid infringement.
  • Design-around strategies to develop alternative compounds or formulations.

Conclusion

EP3638240 exemplifies a sophisticated patent protecting a potentially impactful drug development innovation. The scope spans chemical composition, utility, and manufacturing processes, potentially establishing a robust intellectual property barrier. Nonetheless, the competitive landscape, characterized by numerous similar patents, necessitates ongoing vigilance for infringement and validity challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • The breadth of EP3638240's claims determines its market power; precise claim drafting is crucial.
  • A comprehensive patent landscape analysis reveals competitors and potential licensing opportunities.
  • Strategic patent portfolio management minimizes legal risks and maximizes commercial advantage.
  • Ongoing patent validity assessments are vital given the evolving prior art and opposition risks.
  • Innovators should consider regional filings beyond Europe to extend protection globally.

FAQs

1. What types of claims are most critical in drug patents like EP3638240?
Use, composition, and process claims form the backbone of pharmaceutical patents, with composition claims often providing the broadest protection, followed by method and use claims.

2. How does the patent landscape influence drug development strategies?
Understanding existing patents guides researchers in identifying gaps or avoiding infringement, shaping innovative approaches and licensing negotiations.

3. What challenges are associated with broad patent claims in pharmaceuticals?
They risk being invalidated for lack of novelty or inventive step. Narrower claims reduce this risk but may limit market exclusivity.

4. How can companies ensure freedom-to-operate around patents like EP3638240?
By conducting thorough clearance searches, designing around existing claims, and developing alternative compounds or formulations.

5. What is the significance of patent families related to EP3638240?
Patent families extend patent protection internationally, providing longer-term exclusivity and strategic leverage in key markets.


Sources:

[1] European Patent Office, Patent EP3638240 documentation and legal status.
[2] WIPO PATENTSCOPE database for related patent families and classifications.
[3] Jurgen, L. et al., “Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies,” Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2021.
[4] European Patent Convention guidelines for assessing patent scope and claims.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.