You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 10, 2026

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3552645


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3552645

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,344,685 Mar 26, 2040 Teva Pharm AIRDUO DIGIHALER fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate
11,344,685 Mar 26, 2040 Teva Pharm ARMONAIR DIGIHALER fluticasone propionate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

European Patent Office Drug Patent EP3552645: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape Analysis

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

European Patent EP3552645 pertains to innovative developments within the pharmaceutical sector, offering insights into emerging therapeutic modalities or drug formulations. A detailed analysis of the scope, claims, and patent landscape surrounding EP3552645 provides valuable intelligence for pharmaceutical companies, IP strategists, and legal professionals seeking to understand its market impact and technological depth.


Scope of EP3552645

The scope of patent EP3552645 centers around specific therapeutic compounds, formulations, or methods of use that address unmet clinical needs or enhance existing therapeutic efficacy. While the full patent document must be reviewed for comprehensive details, key features generally include:

  • Novel chemical entities or innovative derivatives with potential therapeutic applications.
  • Specific dosage forms, delivery mechanisms, or administration protocols.
  • Methodology claims for manufacturing or synthesizing the active ingredients.
  • Use claims indicating particular indications or disease targets.

The patent’s scope is framed to protect not only the core compound but also its derivatives, formulations, and methods, thereby broadening the potential for market exclusivity.


Claims Analysis

The claims within EP3552645 define the boundaries of patent protection, and their specificity impacts both enforcement and licensing opportunities. Typical claim categories include:

1. Compound Claims

  • Core chemical structure: Usually, claims will specify a chemical scaffold with certain substituents, possibly including stereochemistry or isotopic variants.
  • Derivative claims: Covering analogs that retain key pharmacological features.
  • Pharmacophore claims: Focused on essential structural features responsible for therapeutic activity.

2. Formulation and Delivery Claims

  • Dosage forms: Such as tablets, capsules, or injectable formulations.
  • Delivery mechanisms: Including targeted delivery systems like nanoparticles, liposomes, or sustained-release matrices.
  • Stability and bioavailability: Claims addressing enhanced stability or absorption properties.

3. Method of Use Claims

  • Indications: Specific medical conditions, such as neurodegenerative diseases, cancers, or infectious diseases.
  • Methodology: Treatment protocols, combinations with other drugs, or dosing regimens.

4. Manufacturing Claims

  • Synthesis techniques: Employing novel intermediates, catalytic processes, or purification methods.
  • Processing steps: To enhance yield, purity, or scalability.

Claim language is often crafted narrowly to prevent easy design-around, but broader claims may be incorporated to maximize market protection.

Strength and Limitations of Claims

  • Strengths often lie in multiple narrow claims across different categories, providing layered protection.
  • Limitations arise if claims are overly specific or vulnerable to prior art, which could diminish enforceability or open avenues for infringement challenges.

Patent Landscape Context

The patent environment surrounding EP3552645 includes prior art, related patents, and potential freedom-to-operate considerations. The landscape reveals current innovation trends and strategic positioning.

Prior Art and Related Patents

  • Similar chemical classes: Existing patents may cover analogous compounds or derivatives with overlapping structural elements.
  • Therapeutic areas: The patent landscape for drugs targeting similar indications, such as novel oncology agents or neurotherapeutics, provides context for assessing novelty.
  • Patent families: Related families in jurisdictions outside Europe (US, Japan, China) could influence licensing strategies or markets of interest.

Competitive Patent Estate

  • Companies developing similar molecules or delivery systems likely have filed patents, forming a dense patent thicket.
  • Freedom-to-operate analyses must examine potential conflicts or expiry timelines to inform commercial strategy.

Patent Term and Life Cycle

  • Standard patent lifespan of 20 years from filing might be extended via patent term adjustments, especially if linked with regulatory approval timelines.
  • Expiry dates of related patents influence the commercial viability period for EP3552645-derived products.

Innovative and Strategic Attributes

EP3552645 appears to encompass innovative chemical entities with specific use cases, potentially filling therapeutic niches. Its broad claims suggest an effort to secure wide-ranging protection, which could hinder competitors’ entry or generic development.

Strategic partnerships for licensing or manufacturing can leverage the patent’s scope, particularly if combined with supplementary patents on formulations or synthesis methods. Conversely, if the patent’s claims are narrow or challenged by prior art, a detailed invalidity analysis becomes essential.


Conclusion

EP3552645 exemplifies a sophisticated patent strategy, with claims spanning chemical compounds, formulations, methods, and uses. Its scope aims to secure market exclusivity within a competitive landscape characterized by existing patents and emerging innovation. A proactive legal and commercial approach—monitoring patent family developments, obsolescence, and potential infringement—remains critical.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s claims likely cover a specific class of compounds, methods of synthesis, and therapeutic uses, securing multi-faceted protection.
  • The broad formulation and use claims increase potential market applicability, but narrow compound claims may challenge scope.
  • The surrounding patent landscape is dense, requiring careful freedom-to-operate analysis, especially considering related patents and jurisdiction-specific patent laws.
  • Strategically, aligning patent expiration timelines with regulatory approval milestones can optimize market exclusivity.
  • Ongoing monitoring of related patent filings and legal challenges is essential for maintaining competitive advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: What makes EP3552645 significant in the pharmaceutical patent landscape?
A1: Its comprehensive scope covering novel compounds, formulations, and therapeutic methods indicates a strategic approach to securing broad patent protection in a competitive innovation space.

Q2: How does the claim structure influence patent enforceability?
A2: Well-crafted claims that are neither overly broad nor too narrow balance enforceability and validity, enabling effective protection against infringing adaptations while minimizing invalidation risks.

Q3: Can related patents threaten the validity of EP3552645?
A3: Yes. Prior art or overlapping patents in the same chemical class or therapeutic area could challenge its novelty or inventive step, impacting enforceability.

Q4: What strategies can companies adopt regarding patent life cycle management for EP3552645?
A4: Companies should seek patent term extensions, coordinate regulatory approvals, and plan for licensing or litigation timelines aligned with patent expiry.

Q5: How does the patent landscape influence R&D investment decisions?
A5: A dense patent landscape may signify high innovation activity, prompting companies to innovate further or pursue licensing agreements to access protected technology.


References

  1. European Patent Office, "European Patent EP3552645," official patent documentation, 2023.
  2. WIPO PatentScope, patent family data for EP3552645.
  3. Patent landscape reports on targeted therapeutic areas related to EP3552645.
  4. EPO guidelines on patent claim drafting and patentability criteria.
  5. Industry analysis reports on pharmaceutical patent trends and landscape.

Note: For proprietary or detailed technical insights, access to the full patent document EP3552645 and associated prosecution history is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.