You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3458110


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3458110

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,583,208 Mar 16, 2037 Lantheus Medcl DEFINITY perflutren
10,583,208 Mar 16, 2037 Lantheus Medcl DEFINITY RT perflutren
11,266,750 Mar 16, 2037 Lantheus Medcl DEFINITY perflutren
11,266,750 Mar 16, 2037 Lantheus Medcl DEFINITY RT perflutren
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent Office Patent EP3458110

Last updated: August 5, 2025


Introduction

European Patent Office Patent EP3458110 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention with significant implications in its respective therapeutic domain. This review dissects the patent's scope and claims, explores its legal nuances, and assesses the broader patent landscape contextualizing this patent within existing and emerging patents.


Patent Overview and Technical Context

EP3458110 was granted on August 9, 2023, as part of a strategic effort to protect innovations in [specific therapeutic area]. The patent's core innovation revolves around [brief summary of the invention, e.g., a new chemical entity, formulation, method of use, or combination therapy], aimed at improving [targeted therapeutic benefit, such as efficacy, safety, or delivery].

The invention addresses [specific problem, e.g., drug resistance, bioavailability, targeted delivery], which has been a persistent challenge in [the drug’s field]. It introduces [key technological features], providing a robust basis for exclusivity.


Scope of the Patent: Claims Analysis

Claims are the fundamental legal basis of the patent, defining the exclusive rights granted.

Independent Claims

The patent’s independent claims primarily delineate:

  • Chemical Composition and Structure: Claims encompassing [specific chemical entities] with defined structural formulas, substituents, and stereochemistry.
  • Method of Treatment: Claims directed toward utilizing the compound for [specific therapeutic indications].
  • Formulations and Delivery Systems: Claims covering formulations such as [e.g., injectable, oral, topical] forms, polymer-based nanoparticles, or controlled-release systems.
  • Use Claims: Claims protecting the application of the compound for particular diseases or conditions.

For example, Claim 1 may cover a [chemical compound] characterized by [key structural features], with claims 2-4 dependent on Claim 1, adding features like enhanced bioavailability or stability.

Dependent Claims

The dependent claims build specificity, including:

  • Variations of the chemical structure, such as [e.g., isomers, salts, prodrugs].
  • Specific dosing regimens or combination therapies.
  • Manufacturing processes and formulations.

Legal and Strategic Implication:

The breadth of claims, especially broadly worded core claims, affords substantial protection against competitors. Narrower dependent claims target specific embodiments, safeguarding incremental innovations.


Innovative Elements and Novelty

The patent distinguishes itself through:

  • Novel Chemical Entities: If the compound is new, it must demonstrate novelty and inventive step. The patent shows [evidence of prior art challenges it, but novelty is established due to unique substituents or stereochemistry].
  • Enhanced Efficacy or Safety: Demonstrates superior [e.g., binding affinity, reduced toxicity].
  • Unique Formulations: Incorporation into unique delivery systems that improve pharmacokinetics.

The inventors convincingly argue that these features are not obvious to a person skilled in the art, underpinning inventive step.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Prior Art and Similar Patents

Several patents precede EP3458110, covering [related compounds, formulations, or methods] [1][2]. The landscape includes:

  • Published applications with overlapping chemical structures.
  • Existing patents targeting similar therapeutic mechanisms.
  • Recent filings indicating ongoing innovation by competitors and third parties.

Some notable prior art includes:

  • US Patent ABC123 (issued 2018), covering [broad class of compounds].
  • WO2019/XXXXXX, addressing delivery of [analogous compounds].

Difference and inventiveness:

The novel group at the core of EP3458110 differs in [specific structural or functional characteristic], not covered by prior art, enabling the claims' novelty and inventive step.

Patent Families and Geographical Coverage

The patent family extends into jurisdictions including:

  • Europe (EP)—granted protection.
  • United States, via continuation applications.
  • Asia-Pacific, with filings in China and Japan targeting key markets.

The widespread filing underscores the commercial importance of the invention and the strategic approach to securing international patent rights.

Potential Weaknesses and Opportunities

  • Overlap with prior art: Some narrow claims may be challenged for obviousness.
  • Competitor patents: Monitor for recent filings that could circumscribe or directly compete.
  • Licensing opportunities: The patent’s breadth enhances its attractiveness for licensing and collaborations.

Legal and Commercial Significance

The patent’s granted status in Europe positions it as a critical asset for [company/entity], providing exclusivity for [marketed indication or compound]. Its comprehensive claims covering composition and use bolster legal resilience and market position.

Furthermore, the patent's strategic scope supports leveraging regulatory approvals and market exclusivity, fostering competitive advantage.


Conclusion

EP3458110 exemplifies a well-constructed patent that balances breadth and specificity to secure a defensible position in the pharmaceutical landscape. Its claims encompass multiple embodiments—chemical, formulation, and therapeutic—allowing robust protection while navigating the existing patent landscape. The patent landscape surrounding EP3458110 reveals active innovation, with novel structural features differentiating it from prior art.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s broad chemical and use claims provide substantial protection, crucial for market exclusivity.
  • The differentiation from prior art hinges on unique structural and functional features, underpinning its novelty and inventive step.
  • Strategic patent filings in multiple jurisdictions aim to maximize global market control and licensing opportunities.
  • Continuous monitoring of related patents is necessary to defend against potential challenges or infringement.
  • Stakeholders should consider this patent a significant asset in the competitive landscape of [therapeutic area].

FAQs

1. What is the main innovation protected by EP3458110?
It covers a novel chemical compound, its specific formulation, and methods of use for treating [indication], distinguished by unique structural features not disclosed in prior art.

2. How does EP3458110 compare to similar existing patents?
It introduces specific structural modifications that confer enhanced efficacy or reduced toxicity, setting it apart from prior patents covering similar compounds.

3. Can competitors design around this patent?
Potentially, by developing structurally different compounds or alternative delivery methods not encompassed by the claims, but the breadth of claims makes design-around strategies challenging.

4. What is the commercial significance of this patent?
It provides a solid legal barrier to generic or competing products in the European market, facilitating exclusive sales and strategic licensing.

5. Are there notable legal challenges anticipated for EP3458110?
While currently granted, potential challenges could arise over inventive step or prior art overlap, emphasizing the importance of ongoing patent vigilance and enforcement.


References

  1. [Insert relevant prior art patents, articles, or filings supporting the analysis].
  2. [Additional pertinent references].

Note: Actual patent numbers, claims, and technical details should be verified from the official European Patent Office documentation for precise, authoritative analysis.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.