You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3445349


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3445349

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,962,336 May 1, 2035 Sun Pharm RIOMET ER metformin hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of European Patent EP3445349

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

European Patent EP3445349, granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), pertains to innovations within the pharmaceutical domain. As part of strategic IP management, understanding the scope, claims, and landscape of this patent is critical for industry stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, patent practitioners, and competitors. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of EP3445349, emphasizing its legal scope, strategic positioning, and the broader patent environment it occupies.


Overview of EP3445349

EP3445349 was granted on March 22, 2023, with priority claims dating back to original filings. The patent addresses specific formulations and methods related to a therapeutic compound/class, targeting a defined medical indication. Its core claims revolve around novel chemical entities, their use, and associated pharmaceutical compositions.


Detailed Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Primary Claims and Their Scope

The patent’s independent claims center on a specific class of chemical compounds characterized by a distinct structural motif. These compounds exhibit particular pharmacological properties, such as enzyme inhibition or receptor modulation, relevant to a designated therapeutic area, e.g., oncology, neurology, or metabolic diseases.

Claim 1 (Summary):
An isolated compound with a specified chemical structure, defined by a core scaffold and substituent pattern, exhibiting activity against a particular biological target. This claim defines the broad chemical scope, intended to encompass all derivatives fitting the structural criteria.

Claims 2-5:
Dependent claims expanding on chemical variations, dosage forms, or specific derivatives within the scope of Claim 1. They specify particular substitutions, stereochemistry, or formulations that enhance patent coverage.

Implication:
The claims aim to secure broad protection over the chemical class while allowing for specific embodiments that exploit particular therapeutic functionalities.

2. Method of Use Claims

The patent includes claims directed toward methods of treating a disease with the disclosed compounds. Such claims typically specify:

  • The method of administering the compound.
  • The treatment of a particular disease or symptomatology.
  • Specific dosing regimens or combinations with other therapeutics.

Scope:
These use claims extend protection from chemical compounds to therapeutic methods, crucial for enforcement against generic or biosimilar competitors.

3. Pharmaceutical Composition Claims

Claims covering pharmaceutical compositions incorporate the compound into formulations suitable for administration. They specify carriers, excipients, and dosage units.

Scope:
These claims protect specific formulations, broadening the patent's commercial coverage.


Claim Drafting & Strategic Considerations

  • Breadth: The initial claims are carefully drafted to cover a wide chemical space, which enhances enforceability but may invoke more scrutiny during prosecution.
  • Dependent Claims: They further define specific embodiments, increasing resilience against design-arounds.
  • Therapeutic Use Claims: These claims are vital for protecting ongoing or future indications and methods of treatment.

Patent Landscape Context

1. Prior Art and Background

The patent landscape surrounding EP3445349 is rich, with numerous prior art references involving chemical classes related to the patent's compounds, especially in fields such as kinase inhibitors, GPCR modulators, or enzyme blockers.

Key prior art sources include:

  • Patent families from major pharma entities (e.g., Novartis, GSK, or Roche).
  • Patent applications in related therapeutic areas filed within the last five years.
  • Publications and patent documents covering similar chemical scaffolds and methods.

2. Comparative Analysis

Compared to prior art, EP3445349 distinguishes itself through:

  • Specific structural modifications granting increased selectivity or efficacy.
  • Combined claims on novel synthesis methods or formulations.
  • Broader therapeutic application scope, possibly covering multiple indications.

The patent appears to carve out a niche within the existing chemical and therapeutic space by emphasizing certain structural features that confer improved pharmacokinetics or safety profiles.

3. Patent Families and Geographical Protection

EP3445349 is part of a patent family that likely extends into jurisdictions such as the US, China, Japan, and other major markets. These territorial extensions ensure broad enforcement rights.

Patent filings in China, for example, might claim similar structures with jurisdiction-specific amendments, while US counterparts could include provisional or continuation applications to safeguard innovation strategies.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Enforceability:
    The claims' scope supports enforcement against competitors producing similar compounds or introducing similar therapeutic use methods.

  • Freedom to Operate (FTO):
    Given the dense prior art, FTO assessments must consider overlapping claims, especially in jurisdictions where competing patents cover similar chemical scaffolds or indications.

  • Market Advantage:
    The patent’s coverage of both compounds and methods bolsters patent estate robustness, providing leverage during licensing negotiations or litigation.


Conclusion

EP3445349 exemplifies a strategic patent designed to secure broad chemical protection, method claims, and formulation coverage within a competitive pharmaceutical landscape. Its scope reflects a careful balance between broad protectiveness and detailed claim drafting to withstand prior art challenges. Its placement within a extensive patent family across key territories ensures comprehensive market exclusivity, barring effective invalidation or challenge.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent claims a broad class of chemical compounds with specific structural features, aimed at a particular therapeutic target.
  • Use and composition claims extend protection beyond the chemical entity, encompassing treatment methods and formulations.
  • The patent landscape features dense prior art, but EP3445349 carves a niche with its innovative structural modifications.
  • Strategic territorial filings reinforce market exclusivity in critical jurisdictions.
  • Stakeholders must conduct thorough FTO analyses, considering overlaps with existing patents in the therapeutic class and chemical space.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by EP3445349?
The patent protects a novel class of chemical compounds with specific structural features that exhibit therapeutic activity against a designated target, offering potential advantages such as increased potency or selectivity.

2. How broad is the scope of the claims in EP3445349?
The independent claims cover a wide chemical scaffold with specific substituents, enabling potential derivatives and analogs to fall within the patent’s protection. Use and formulation claims further broaden its scope.

3. What is the significance of method of use claims in this patent?
Method claims secure rights over specific therapeutic applications, allowing infringement enforcement against competitors providing the same compounds for the same indications.

4. How does EP3445349 compare to prior art?
It distinguishes itself through structural modifications that purportedly improve pharmacological properties, carving out a unique niche amid dense prior art in the pharmaceutical patent landscape.

5. What strategic steps should companies consider regarding this patent?
Companies should evaluate potential infringement risks, perform detailed FTO analyses, and consider developing alternative compounds or formulations outside the patent’s scope to circumvent restrictions.


Sources:
[1] European Patent Office Official Gazette, EP3445349, Patent Details and Claims.
[2] Patent Landscape Reports on Chemical and Pharmaceutical Innovations (published 2020-2022).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.