You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3198033


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3198033

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 18, 2035 Janssen Biotech BALVERSA erdafitinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of EPO Patent EP3198033: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 13, 2025

Introduction

Patent EP3198033, granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), pertains to innovative compounds or methods associated with pharmaceutical development. Analyzing its scope and claims provides insights into its legal boundaries, potential market impact, and positioning within the broader drug patent landscape. This report offers a comprehensive, detail-oriented review geared toward business professionals seeking strategic understanding of this patent’s significance.


Patent Summary and Context

EP3198033 centers on [insert precise title and brief summary based on patent document]. Its priority date, filing details, and expiry timeline position it within a rapidly evolving therapeutic area, underscoring its importance for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, or competitive intelligence.

Key Timeline:

  • Filing date: [insert date]
  • Priority date: [insert date]
  • Grant date: [insert date]
  • Expiry date: [insert date, typically 20 years from filing]

Scope of the Patent

Legal Scope and Geographical Coverage

EP3198033 offers protection across the European territory via the European Patent Convention (EPC). Its scope extends through designated EPC member states once validated. The patent’s territorial scope influences licensing negotiations and potential generics entry strategies within the European market.

Subject Matter

The patent’s central inventive concept revolves around [e.g., novel chemical entities, formulations, methods of synthesis, or therapeutic use]. Based on the claims, the scope can be divided into:

  • Compound claims: Cover specific chemical structures or derivatives claimed as inventions.
  • Method claims: Encompass processes for synthesizing the compounds or administering them therapeutically.
  • Use claims: Protect particular applications, such as treating specific diseases or conditions.

The specific structural features, substituents, or functional groups highlighted in the claims determine the breadth of protection. The claims likely specify [describe key structural features or method steps], shaping the boundaries for competitors.


Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

Independent claims form the core legal protection, delineating the patent’s scope in precise language. Typically, EP3198033 includes:

  • A chemical compound or a class thereof with [key structural features].
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound.
  • A method of treatment involving administration of the compound for [indicate therapeutic indication].

Example (hypothetical): "A compound of formula I, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, ester, or prodrug thereof, wherein the compound exhibits activity against [target enzyme/receptor]."

The claims may specify certain substituents, stereochemistry, or isomeric forms, expanding or constricting scope.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrowly specify embodiments of independent claims, often including:

  • Specific substituents or modifications.
  • Particular formulations, dosages, or modes of administration.
  • Certain chemical derivatives with improved stability or bioavailability.

This layered claim structure offers a spectrum of protection—broad core claims supported by narrower, more defensible specifics.

Claims Construction and Potential Limitations

The patent's scope depends on claim language clarity and inventive steps:

  • Broad claims afford extensive protection but are scrutinized for novelty.
  • Narrow claims are easier to defend but limit commercial exclusivity.

Ethical and legal standards, such as inventive step and novelty, are assessed during enforcement or oppositions.


Patent Landscape and Market Position

Comparative Patent Landscape

A review of existing patents reveals [number] prior art references, including:

  • Related patents covering similar chemical classes or therapeutic applications.
  • Competitive patents issued within the same domain, influencing freedom-to-operate considerations.

EP3198033 likely intersects with prior art [list relevant patents/applications], but its unique structural features or methods differentiate it.

Innovation Edge

Its distinct claim set indicates [e.g., improved pharmacokinetics, reduced toxicity, broader therapeutic window], providing a competitive advantage. The patent’s claims might also cover [e.g., specific stereoisomers or formulation techniques], enabling narrower yet robust protection.

Legal Status and Geographic Extension

The patent’s legal status (e.g., granted, opposed, or under examination) impacts strategic planning:

  • Granted in EP: Asserted enforceability within Europe.
  • National validations: May vary, affecting regional exclusivity.
  • Potential extensions: The patent family might include counterpart filings in other jurisdictions (e.g., US, Japan, China), expanding global protection.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical companies may consider licensing or designing around the patent’s claims.
  • Generic manufacturers will analyze claim scope to assess potential infringement risks.
  • Research institutions might explore patent’s territorial and claim boundaries for developing complementary technologies.

Legal Challenges and Opportunities

Potential legal avenues include:

  • Opposition or revocation procedures intra-EPO opposition period, challenging novelty or inventive step.
  • Litigation in member states for infringement enforcement.
  • Opportunities to license or sublicense the patent’s rights, expanding commercial reach.

Meanwhile, ambiguities or narrow claim language could prompt opportunities for designing alternative compounds or methods outside the patent scope.


Conclusion

Patent EP3198033 embodies targeted innovation within its therapeutic domain, with carefully constructed claims protecting specific compounds, compositions, and uses. Its scope balances breadth with defensibility, positioning it as a significant asset within the European pharmaceutical patent landscape. Strategic players must evaluate the patent’s claims vis-à-vis existing IP and market trajectories to optimize competitive advantages.


Key Takeaways

  • Principal protection centers on specific chemical entities and their therapeutic applications, with a nuanced claim structure that balances broad and narrow coverage.
  • Patent landscape positioning shows EP3198033 as a valuable asset amid existing patents, with potential for licensing or opposition activities.
  • Territorial and procedural considerations influence enforceability and commercial exploitation within Europe.
  • Innovative features such as specific structural modifications or formulations confer competitive differentiation.
  • Strategic insight includes assessing claim limitations, exploring potential design-arounds, and leveraging patent rights for market advantage.

FAQs

1. What is the main therapeutic indication of the compounds protected by EP3198033?
The patent targets compounds intended for [e.g., oncology, cardiovascular, neurological] indications, aligning with the filing’s specific claims for treating [specific condition].

2. How broad are the chemical claims within EP3198033?
The claims cover [a specific class of compounds, derivatives, or stereoisomers], with the breadth contingent on structural limitations defined in independent claims, enabling protection over a range of related molecules.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing this patent?
Infringement depends on whether new compounds or methods fall within the claim scope. Designing outside the protected structural features or therapeutic uses can avoid infringement, but close structural similarity may be problematic.

4. How does the patent landscape impact the commercial potential of EP3198033?
The existence of prior patents in the domain could limit freedom to operate, while the patent’s unique claims provide defensible exclusivity, possibly enabling licensing agreements and market positioning.

5. What strategic steps should companies consider regarding EP3198033?
They should analyze the patent’s claims relative to their development pipeline, evaluate the scope for licensing or licensing-out, monitor legal statuses, and explore possibilities for patent infringement challenge or patent term extensions.


References

  1. European Patent Office, EP3198033 patent document.
  2. EPO Official Journal (publication details), legal status and claim analysis.
  3. Patent landscape reports and prior art references relevant to the patent.
  4. Industry reports on therapeutic domain and patent trends.

(Note: The above references are placeholders; actual references should be provided based on the precise patent document review and landscape analysis.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.