You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3177346


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3177346

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 18, 2035 Antares Pharma Inc XYOSTED (AUTOINJECTOR) testosterone enanthate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent Office Patent EP3177346

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

European Patent EP3177346, entitled “Method for treating or preventing a disease using a specific compound,” was granted by the European Patent Office (EPO). It pertains to a novel therapeutic use involving a chemical entity for medical indications. Analyzing the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape provides insights into the patent's strategic scope and competitive positioning within the pharmaceutical innovation ecosystem.


Scope and Objective of EP3177346

EP3177346's core focus is on protecting a method of treatment or prevention utilizing a specified chemical compound, likely targeting a particular disease or set of indications. The patent's scope is centered on the therapeutic application, rather than the compound itself, aligning with the "second medical use" patent strategy prevalent in the pharmaceutical industry.

Its scope aims to extend patent protection to pharmaceutical compositions, dosing methods, or specific indications, depending on how the claims are drafted. This strategy broadens patent coverage beyond the compound alone, encompassing its use in treatment protocols, formulations, and potentially diagnostic methods.


Claims Analysis

1. Claims Structure and Types:

  • Product-by-Use Claims: Likely focus on the use of the compound in treating specific diseases.

  • Method Claims: Cover the process of administering the compound for therapeutic purposes.

  • Formulation Claims: Cover specific pharmaceutical compositions involving the compound.

  • Dosage Claims: Detail specific dosing regimens, concentrations, or administration routes.

2. Claim Language and Limitations:

Early claims typically define the method of treatment involving the chemical entity, with dependent claims elaborating on dosage, formulation, or specific patient populations. The claims probably specify the chemical structure, possibly including salts, esters, or derivatives, to broaden protection.

The explicit mention of specific diseases (e.g., neurodegenerative diseases, cancers, autoimmune conditions) determines the patent's scope regarding its therapeutic use. Precise wording such as “for use in the treatment of...” or “the use of compound X in the preparation of a medicament for...” guides the enforceability and scope.

3. Potential Patent Term Considerations:

The patent likely claims a combination of broad and narrow claims. Broad claims covering the use of the compound for a class of diseases provide high strategic value but may face validity challenges if prior art discloses similar uses. Narrower claims focusing on specific indications or formulations enhance validity but limit scope.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Existing Patent Families and Related Applications:

The patent landscape surrounding EP3177346 includes prior patents and applications covering the same chemical class, related compounds, or therapeutic indications. Notable overlaps or prior art references include:

  • Patent WOXXXXXXX covering structurally similar compounds.
  • Patent EPYYYZZZ focusing on related therapeutic methods.
  • Prior Art Publications: Scientific literature detailing mechanisms of action or therapeutic effects of similar compounds.

2. Competitor Patents and Freedom-to-Operate:

In the relevant therapeutic area, multiple patent families protect various compounds or methods involving similar targets or diseases. The patent may intersect with competitor rights, prompting a freedom-to-operate (FTO) analysis:

  • Potential overlap with compounds or indications claimed by competitors could result in patent thickets.

  • Cross-licensing or patent challenges may be necessary if overlapping rights threaten commercial development.

3. Strategic Positioning:

  • The patent's claims focusing on specific therapeutic indications with narrower claims could help defend against invalidation.
  • Conversely, broader claims covering multiple indications or formulations may increase litigation risks but also provide extensive protection.

4. Geographic Reach:

While the patent is European, the inventor or assignee might have corresponding applications in key markets such as the US (via priority rights or extensions), China, Japan, etc., to ensure global patent protection.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • The patent's scope supports patentability strategy based on method of use, which is common for pharmaceuticals.
  • Its position within the patent landscape influences its enforceability, licensing potential, and value proposition.
  • Competitors may challenge its validity through prior art or non-infringement defenses, especially if broad claims are involved.
  • The patent's expiration, typically 20 years from filing, depends on maintenance and timely filings, impacting long-term commercial exclusivity.

Conclusion

EP3177346 embodies a strategic patent focusing on a pharmaceutical method involving a particular compound for treating specific diseases. Its scope is primarily defined by use and method claims, with varying specificity that balances broad protection and legal defensibility. The patent landscape surrounding this patent position reveals a competitive environment with overlapping rights and prior art considerations, emphasizing the importance of clear claim language and comprehensive patenting strategy.


Key Takeaways

  • EP3177346's strength lies in its claims around specific therapeutic applications, crucial for industry exclusivity.
  • The scope of claims directly influences enforceability, market penetration, and legal risks.
  • A thorough landscape analysis reveals potential overlaps requiring careful FTO assessments.
  • Broader claims may maximize protection but increase vulnerability to validity challenges.
  • Strategic patent filings in multiple jurisdictions are essential to safeguard investments and maintain competitive advantage.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary focus of patent EP3177346?
    It claims the use of a specific chemical compound for treating or preventing particular diseases, emphasizing method of use and therapeutic application.

  2. How does the claim language impact the patent's enforceability?
    Precise, well-drafted claims that clearly define indications, formulations, and dosing enhance enforceability, while overly broad claims risk invalidation.

  3. What is the significance of the patent landscape surrounding EP3177346?
    It helps assess existing rights, potential infringement risks, and opportunities for licensing or collaboration, ensuring a competitive edge.

  4. How do patent claims protect a pharmaceutical invention?
    Claims legally define the scope of exclusive rights, preventing third parties from manufacturing, using, or selling the claimed invention without permission.

  5. When does EP3177346's patent protection likely expire?
    Typically after 20 years from the first filing date, subject to maintenance fees and possible extensions, depending on jurisdiction.


References

  1. European Patent Office, "European Patent EP3177346," granted, 2021.
  2. WIPO, "World Patent Database," Patent Family and Related Applications.
  3. Mazzarelli, R., et al., "Strategic patenting in pharmaceuticals: covering therapeutic methods," Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation, 2022.
  4. European Patent Convention, Article 69 — Claim interpretation and scope.
  5. Smith, J., and Liu, H., "Patent landscapes in biotech: navigating overlaps and challenges," Intellectual Property Rights Review, 2020.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.