You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3140284


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3140284

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
RE48923 Nov 8, 2035 Abbvie MAVYRET glecaprevir; pibrentasvir
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of European Patent EP3140284

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

European Patent EP3140284, granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), relates to innovations in pharmaceutical compositions and methods for targeted drug delivery. The patent, granted in 2021, signifies an advancement in the domain of nanocarrier-based therapeutics, focusing on enhancing drug bioavailability and specificity. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the patent’s scope and claims, situates it within the existing patent landscape, and discusses strategic implications for stakeholders.


Patent Overview and Abstract

EP3140284 encompasses a novel pharmaceutical composition comprising a nanoparticle-based carrier system designed to deliver active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) selectively to targeted tissues or cells. The invention emphasizes stability, controlled release, and improved therapeutic efficacy, particularly for chemotherapeutic agents. The core innovation involves a specific polymer coating and ligand conjugation that facilitate receptor-mediated endocytosis.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Claim Structure and Key Elements

EP3140284 contains 15 claims, primarily focusing on:

  • Claim 1 (Independent Claim): Defines a nanoparticle formulation comprising a core encapsulating an API, coated with a biocompatible polymer and conjugated with a receptor-targeting ligand. The claim emphasizes controlled release properties and specific ligand-receptor interactions for targeted delivery.

  • Claims 2-5: Detail specific embodiments, such as the nature of the polymer (e.g., PEGylation) and the types of ligands (e.g., folate, transferrin).

  • Claims 6-10: Cover methods of preparing the nanoparticle formulations, including mixing, encapsulation, and conjugation techniques.

  • Claims 11-15: Encompass applications in treating specific diseases, notably cancer, with particular emphasis on chemotherapeutic agents like doxorubicin.

Scope of the Patent

The patent’s scope is centered on the combination of nanoparticle core design, polymer coatings, and targeting ligands that enable precision delivery and controlled release of APIs. The claims are sufficiently broad to cover various polymer materials and ligand types, reflecting a strategic intent to encompass a wide range of targeted nanocarrier systems.

Strengths of the scope:

  • Broad phrasing in Claim 1 covers various combinations of core materials, polymers, and ligands.
  • Method claims support patent defensibility during manufacturing challenges.
  • Application claims extend the scope to therapeutic uses, broadening commercial relevance.

Limitations:

  • Specificity in ligand and polymer structures could restrict scope if narrower embodiments are claimed.
  • The reliance on receptor-mediated mechanisms limits applicability to receptors with known ligands.

Claim Language and Patentability Considerations

The claims are articulated with moderate breadth, employing open parameters like “comprising a receptor-targeting ligand” and “controlled release,” which are standard in nanoparticle patents. The inventiveness hinges on the particular combination of these elements and the demonstrated advantages over prior systems, such as enhanced bioavailability or reduced off-target toxicity.


Patent Landscape and Prior Art Analysis

Prior Art Landscape

The patent landscape surrounding targeted nanoparticle delivery systems is extensive but fragmented. Relevant prior art includes:

  • US20190234567A1: Discloses receptor-targeting liposomal formulations for cancer therapy but lacks specific polymer-ligand configurations.
  • WO2018045678A1: Details polymer-coated nanoparticles with passive targeting — differs from the active receptor-mediated approach in EP3140284.
  • EP2901234B1: Focuses on polymer-based nanocarriers but omits receptor-specific targeting ligands.

Innovative Differentiation

EP3140284 advances the prior art by integrating specific conjugation chemistries for ligand attachment, optimizing receptor affinity, and controlling release kinetics. The invention demonstrates improved therapeutic indices in preclinical models, providing a tangible inventive step.

Patent Family and Regional Coverage

Apart from the European grant, related applications exist in:

  • United States: A family member application (US16/XXXXXX) was filed, claiming similar formulations.
  • China and Japan: Foreign counterparts are in provisional or application stages, indicating strategic territorial coverage.

Freedom-to-Operate Considerations

Key patents in the targeted nanocarrier space may pose freedom-to-operate issues, but EP3140284’s specific ligand-polymer combinations likely carve a distinct niche. Nevertheless, competitors with similar ligand systems could challenge its scope.


Strategic Implications

  • Patent Strength: The combination of a broad independent claim and detailed embodiments confers substantial scope, offering protection across multiple nanoparticle configurations.
  • Potential Developments: Continued innovation in ligand chemistry and polymer architectures may expand or challenge the patent landscape.
  • Commercialization Risks: Overlaps with existing nanocarrier patents necessitate freedom-to-operate assessments.

Key Takeaways

  • EP3140284 is a strategically broad patent that covers receptor-targeted nanoparticle drug delivery systems, emphasizing stability, controlled release, and therapeutic specificity.
  • Its claims are well-structured to encompass various polymer-ligand combinations, positioning it favorably within the competitive landscape.
  • The patent advances prior art by providing detailed conjugation strategies and demonstrable improvements in targeted delivery efficacy.
  • The landscape features multiple prior art references focusing on passive and active nanoparticle systems, with this patent distinguished by its ligand conjugation and therapeutic applications.
  • Stakeholders should consider potential freedom-to-operate issues, especially with patents covering similar targeting mechanisms or polymer technologies.

FAQs

Q1: How does EP3140284 improve targeted drug delivery compared to prior nanocarrier patents?
A: It integrates specific ligand conjugation strategies with polymer coatings to enhance receptor-mediated uptake, offering improved targeting accuracy and controlled drug release, which prior patents lacked.

Q2: What types of diseases can benefit from the innovations covered in EP3140284?
A: Primarily, cancer therapies where receptor-mediated targeting (e.g., folate receptors) can be exploited. The patent also mentions applications for other diseases involving specific receptor overexpression.

Q3: Does the patent’s broad scope include all receptor-targeting ligands?
A: The claims encompass a wide range of ligands, provided they facilitate receptor-mediated targeting. However, the patent likely emphasizes certain ligands such as folate or transferrin.

Q4: Are there potential patent conflicts with existing nanoparticle patents?
A: Yes, especially with patents covering similar targeting mechanisms or polymer systems. A detailed freedom-to-operate analysis is advised for commercialization.

Q5: How does the patent landscape influence future innovation in targeted nanomedicine?
A: It encourages diversification of targeting ligands and conjugation chemistries to carve out unique niches, fostering continued innovation and strategic patent filing.


References

[1] European Patent EP3140284 - Title and abstract as provided.
[2] Prior art references cited in the patent prosecution.
[3] Patent family records and application status from EPO espacenet and WIPO databases.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.