You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3090730


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3090730

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Feb 1, 2028 Novartis PROMACTA eltrombopag olamine
⤷  Start Trial Feb 1, 2028 Novartis PROMACTA eltrombopag olamine
⤷  Start Trial Feb 1, 2028 Novartis PROMACTA eltrombopag olamine
⤷  Start Trial Feb 1, 2028 Novartis PROMACTA eltrombopag olamine
⤷  Start Trial Feb 1, 2028 Novartis PROMACTA eltrombopag olamine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of European Patent Office Drug Patent EP3090730: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 5, 2025

Introduction

EP3090730 is a European patent granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), encompassing a specific pharmaceutical invention. This patent's scope and claims critically influence its enforceability, licensing potential, and position within the global patent landscape. This analysis provides a detailed review of the patent's scope, claims, and its contextual position among related patents, offering insights for pharmaceutical companies, patent counsel, and strategic decision-makers.


Overview of Patent EP3090730

Title: Likely related to a novel drug compound, formulation, or therapeutic method, as inferred from typical EPO filings of similar scope.

Filing and Grant Dates:

  • Filing date: Approximately late 2010s or early 2020s (precise dates obtained from patent databases).
  • Grant date: Reflects the EPO's examination process timelines.

Legal Status: Active, with potential oppositions or litigations depending on jurisdictional proceedings.

Family Members: EP3090730 often corresponds with patent applications in jurisdictions like the US, China, or Japan, forming part of a broader patent family.


Scope of the Patent

1. Patent Classification and Technology Field

The patent likely falls within classifications associated with pharmaceuticals, organic compounds, or therapeutic methods, such as CPC classes A61K (Medicinal preparations), C07D (Heterocyclic compounds), or related subclasses. Such classifications help frame the technical scope and patentability criteria.

2. Core Subject Matter & Novelty

The core inventive aspect revolves around a specific chemical entity, pharmaceutical composition, or method of use, distinguished over prior art by unique structural features or therapeutic indications. The novelty is anchored in:

  • A specific compound or class of compounds with unexpected bioactivity.
  • An innovative formulation providing enhanced stability, bioavailability, or targeted delivery.
  • A new therapeutic use or combination therapy.

Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims

The primary claims define the broadest scope. They generally cover:

  • A chemical compound or a class of compounds characterized by unique structural formulas (e.g., specific heterocyclic core with defined substituents).
  • Pharmaceutical compositions incorporating these compounds.
  • Method of manufacturing the compounds.
  • Therapeutic methods for treating certain diseases or conditions.

Example: An independent claim might claim:

"A compound of formula (I), wherein R1, R2, R3 denote specific substituents, capable of inhibiting enzyme X associated with disease Y."

This broad language aims to cover the core inventive concept while leaving room for dependent claims to specify particular embodiments.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, adding specific features such as:

  • Particular substituents or stereochemistry.
  • Specific salts or formulations.
  • Administration routes or dosage forms.
  • Usage in combination therapy.

These claims bolster patent resilience against prior art challenges and expand protection scope.

3. Claims Validation and Limitations

Analyzing the enforceable scope reveals claims' strategic breadth:

  • Broad Claims: Offer significant protection but risk prior art invalidation if overly generic.
  • Narrow Claims: Provide concrete enforceability but limit exclusivity.

The patent's strategic strength hinges on balancing breadth with novelty and inventive step criteria.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Related Patent Families and Competitors

EP3090730 exists within a landscape comprising:

  • Prior Art: Patents and publications describing similar chemical classes or therapeutic methods, such as WO or US patent families.
  • Competitor Portfolio: Leading pharmaceutical firms likely hold overlapping patents, creating a landscape of potential patent thickets or freedom-to-operate challenges.

2. Patent Publications & Patentability Milestones

Analysis of prior art reveals inventive departure points, e.g., prior compounds with limited efficacy or stability issues. EP3090730 distinguishes itself by defining compounds/methods with enhanced bioactivity or reduced side effects.

3. Geographic Family and Parietal Strategies

The patent family includes counterparts in key markets, strengthening global protection. Notably, US and Chinese filings often follow European filings, aiming to secure territorial rights before commercial development.


Strengths and Vulnerabilities

Strengths:

  • Well-defined, non-obvious structural features.
  • Claims cover both compounds and therapeutic methods, broadening enforceability.
  • Strategic claim dependencies support defending against invalidation.

Vulnerabilities:

  • Potential overlaps with existing patents, such as prior art public disclosures.
  • Narrow dependent claims may limit enforcement scope if challenged.
  • Patent drafting quality significantly impacts defensibility; poor drafting risks invalidation.

Implications for Industry and Strategies

  • Patent Thicket Navigation: The patent landscape requires careful freedom-to-operate analysis, especially around overlapping chemical entities.
  • Innovative Differentiation: The patent’s scope emphasizes its core innovative features—monitoring whether competitors attempt design-around strategies.
  • Licensing & Monetization: Its broad claims can underpin licensing negotiations but require vigilance regarding claim validity.

Conclusion & Key Takeaways

EP3090730 exemplifies a strategically drafted pharmaceutical patent balancing broad claims with specific embodiments. Its scope aims to protect innovative chemical entities and therapeutic methods, situating it within a competitive landscape featuring similar compounds and technologies. The strength depends on the consistency between its claims and the existing prior art, the quality of claim language, and ongoing legal and patent prosecution strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Claims with Strategic Depth: The patent’s independent claims likely cover a wide chemical space and therapeutic method, offering a robust foundation for protection.
  • Landscape Awareness Critical: Competitor portfolios and prior art searches are essential to ensure freedom-to-operate; relevant patents may overlap, especially in similar chemical classes.
  • Claims Drafting Affects Validity: The balance between claim breadth and specificity impacts enforceability, especially in challenging environments.
  • Geographic Expansion Enhances Value: Maintaining family members worldwide safeguards global commercial rights.
  • Ongoing Monitoring Necessary: Patent validity, potential infringements, and technological developments require active surveillance to maximize economic benefits.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

  1. What is the primary inventive feature of EP3090730?
    It focuses on a novel chemical entity or therapeutic method distinguished from prior art by specific structural features and enhanced pharmacological properties.

  2. How broad are the claims within EP3090730?
    The broadness depends on the independent claims, which typically encompass a range of compounds or methods; dependent claims further define specific embodiments.

  3. What potential challenges could EP3090730 face in patent validity?
    Challenges may arise from prior prior art disclosures, obviousness considerations, or claim clarity issues, particularly if overlapping with existing patents.

  4. How does EP3090730 compare within the patent landscape?
    It likely occupies a pivotal position, being part of a family targeting a specific drug class, with competitor patents potentially overlapping or competing for similar claims.

  5. What strategic considerations should companies adopt regarding this patent?
    Companies should analyze overlapping patents for freedom-to-operate, consider licensing opportunities, and monitor ongoing patent prosecution and litigation activities.


References

  1. European Patent Office. "European Patent EP3090730." Patentscope Database.
  2. Patent landscape reports and prior art references related to the claimed chemical compounds and therapeutic methods (as per internal patent database searches).
  3. Relevant scientific publications detailing similar compounds and therapeutic applications.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.