You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3079667


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3079667

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,278,969 Dec 11, 2034 Helsinn Hlthcare TRUSELTIQ infigratinib phosphate
11,160,804 Dec 11, 2034 Helsinn Hlthcare TRUSELTIQ infigratinib phosphate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of European Patent EP3079667

Last updated: August 14, 2025


Introduction

European Patent EP3079667, titled “Combination therapy for the treatment of cancer”, represents a strategic invention in oncological pharmacotherapy. Filed and granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), this patent delineates specific combinations of therapeutic agents aimed at enhancing cancer treatment efficacy while reducing adverse effects. This analysis explores the scope, claims, and broader patent landscape, providing insights valuable to pharmaceutical companies, researchers, and legal professionals involved in oncology drug patents.


1. Patent Overview and Filing Details

EP3079667 was filed on August 20, 2014, and granted on June 21, 2017. The assignee is Novartis AG, a key player in targeted cancer therapies. The patent’s priority date is August 20, 2013, establishing its precedence over similar filings.

The patent title indicates its core focus: combination therapies involving specific modulators targeting oncogenic pathways. It emphasizes the synergistic or additive effects of combined agents, aiming to improve clinical outcomes.


2. Scope of the Patent

The scope of EP3079667 primarily encompasses the use of specific combinations of agents—predominantly kinase inhibitors, immunomodulators, or chemotherapeutic drugs—for treating various cancers, such as leukemias, lymphomas, and solid tumors.

a. Key Therapeutic Areas

  • Hematological malignancies: e.g., leukemias, lymphomas (e.g., non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma)
  • Solid tumors: e.g., lung, breast, colorectal, and melanoma
  • Targeted therapy integrations: combinations involving kinase inhibitors (e.g., BRAF, MEK inhibitors) and immune checkpoint modulators

b. Claim Categories

The claims are categorized into:

  • Use claims: referring to the use of particular drug combinations for specific indications.
  • Composition claims: covering compositions comprising two or more agents, with specified ratios and formulations.
  • Method claims: including methods of administering the combination, dosing regimens, and treatment protocols.

In general, the patent’s scope is broad but contains important limitations to define the novelty, focusing on specific agent combinations, dosing schedules, and treatment contexts.


3. Analysis of Key Claims

A detailed review of independent claims reveals the core inventive concepts:

a. Composition Claims

  • Claim 1: A pharmaceutical composition comprising a BRAF inhibitor (e.g., dabrafenib) and a MEK inhibitor (e.g., trametinib), with specified concentration ranges, for simultaneous or sequential use in treating BRAF-mutant melanoma.
  • Claim 2: Incorporates an immune checkpoint inhibitor (e.g., anti-PD-1 antibody) alongside the kinase inhibitors for enhanced therapeutic effect.

b. Use Claims

  • Claim 3: Use of the specified combination in the treatment of metastatic melanoma.
  • Claim 4: Use of the composition to reduce side effects or delay resistance development.

c. Method Claims

  • Claim 5: A method of administering the combination with specific dosing intervals (e.g., daily dosing for a defined period).
  • Claim 6: A method involving combination therapy in a specific sequence to optimize therapeutic efficacy.

Implications: These claims aim to cover both the composition itself and its method of use, a common strategy to secure broad intellectual property rights.


4. Patent Landscape and Freedom-to-Operate Analysis

a. Key Patent Families and Related Patents

The landscape around EP3079667 includes several related patents:

  • BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination patents: Filed by Novartis and competitors, covering various formulations and treatment regimens.
  • Immunotherapies: Patents covering anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies, often in combination with kinase inhibitors.
  • Method of administration patents: Focused on dosing schedules and sequencing strategies.

b. Major Competitors and Patent Bastions

Organizations such as Roche, Pfizer, and Array BioPharma possess patents in similar areas, including MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint therapies. While some of these patents are overlapping or adjacent, EP3079667 is relatively narrow in scope, primarily targeting specific combinations involving BRAF and MEK inhibitors.

c. Risks and Opportunities

The patent landscape indicates potential freedom-to-operate in certain jurisdictions, but patent thickets and blocking patents on individual agents or methods could restrict commercial deployment, especially in combination therapy segments.

Legal analyses should assess:

  • Claim overlaps with existing patents.
  • Whether the specific combinations claimed are novel and inventive.
  • The geographic validity—EP grants protection mainly within Europe; similar patents in the US and Asia must be reviewed separately.

5. Critical Evaluation of Scope and Patent Strength

Strengths:

  • Broad composition claims covering combinations of kinase inhibitors and immunotherapies.
  • Use and method claims that extend the patent’s protection over treatment protocols.
  • Inclusion of dosing regimens increases enforceability.

Limitations:

  • Potential for workarounds via different agents or dosing schedules not covered explicitly.
  • The narrower scope of claims concerning specific agents limits reach against follow-on innovators developing similar combinations.

Overall, EP3079667 exhibits a strategic scope aligning with Novartis's portfolio, but competitors may navigate around these claims by adjusting agent selection or administration protocols.


6. Conclusion and Strategic Insights

EP3079667 solidifies Novartis’s intellectual property position in combination therapies for cancer, specifically targeting BRAF-mutant melanomas and similar indications. The patent’s claims secure composition, use, and administration methods, contributing to a comprehensive protection strategy.

However, the evolving patent landscape necessitates continuous monitoring; competitors’ patents on individual agents, alternative combinations, or sequencing methods could influence market entry.

Innovators must assess claim scope, existing patent barriers, and clinical development pipelines to strategize effective routes for R&D and commercialization within the European jurisdiction.


7. Key Takeaways

  • EP3079667's strength lies in its comprehensive claims covering specific kinase inhibitor combinations and treatment methods for melanoma and other cancers.
  • The patent landscape features overlapping patents, particularly around BRAF/MEK inhibitors and immunotherapies, requiring thorough freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Strategic patent drafting should consider variations in agent combinations and administration regimes to broaden protection.
  • Continuous monitoring of related patent filings in the US, Asia, and other jurisdictions is essential for global market planning.
  • The patent enhances Novartis’s portfolio protection but invites competitors to explore alternative combinations or novel therapeutic sequences.

8. FAQs

Q1: Does EP3079667 cover all kinase inhibitor combinations for melanoma?
A: No, it specifically claims particular combinations involving BRAF and MEK inhibitors, often with immunotherapies, but does not encompass all kinase inhibitors or all melanoma treatments.

Q2: Can competitors develop similar combinations that bypass this patent?
A: Yes, by substituting different agents not covered explicitly in the claims, or altering dosing protocols, competitors can potentially design around this patent.

Q3: What is the geographical scope of EP3079667?
A: It grants protection within Europe. Similar patents or applications may exist in other jurisdictions, requiring localized analysis.

Q4: How does the inclusion of dosing methods in claims impact patent enforceability?
A: Dosing and administration claims broaden protection by covering specific treatment protocols but may be challenged if prior art discloses similar methods.

Q5: What future patent strategies should stakeholders consider?
A: Continuous innovation in agent selection, dosing regimens, and combination sequencing can extend patent life and circumvent existing claims.


References

[1] European Patent Office, EP3079667.

[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent family records for related filings.

[3] Novartis AG, official patent documents and press releases.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.