You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 3056492


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 3056492

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 19, 2031 Melinta BAXDELA delafloxacin meglumine
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 2, 2026 Melinta BAXDELA delafloxacin meglumine
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 6, 2026 Melinta BAXDELA delafloxacin meglumine
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 7, 2025 Melinta BAXDELA delafloxacin meglumine
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 7, 2025 Melinta BAXDELA delafloxacin meglumine
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of European Patent EP3056492

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

European Patent EP3056492, granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. This patent plays a strategic role in protecting innovative drug-related technologies, influencing competitive positioning within the pharmaceutical landscape. This analysis delineates the scope and claims of EP3056492, evaluates its novelty and inventive step, and charts its patent landscape, fostering informed decision-making for industry stakeholders.

Scope of EP3056492

EP3056492 encompasses a pharmaceutical invention directed toward specific compounds, compositions, or methods aiming at therapeutic or diagnostic applications. Its scope primarily involves:

  • Chemical entities: Likely novel compounds with specific structural features or modifications conferring advantageous pharmacological profiles.
  • Therapeutic applications: Potentially targeting a particular disease, receptor, or biological pathway.
  • Formulation and administration: May include specific formulations or delivery systems enhancing bioavailability or reducing side effects.
  • Method of use: Defines therapeutic or diagnostic methods involving the compounds or compositions.

The scope's breadth—covering chemical structures, methods, and uses—serves to establish broad protection while hinged on specific inventive features detailed in the claims.

Claims Analysis

The claims delineate the scope of protection and are divided into independent and dependent claims:

1. Independent Claims

These likely define the core inventive concept, typically encompassing:

  • Novel chemical compounds: Structural formulas with specific substituents or stereochemistry.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions: Combinations thereof with carriers or excipients.
  • Method of preparation: Processes for synthesizing the compounds.
  • Therapeutic methods: Use of the compounds in treating particular conditions.

Example (hypothetical):
"A compound of formula I, wherein R1, R2, R3 are as defined, exhibiting activity against [target receptor], and pharmaceutical compositions thereof."

2. Dependent Claims

These specify particular embodiments, such as:

  • Specific substituents or stereoisomers.
  • Particular formulations or dosage forms.
  • Methods of synthesis with certain reagents or conditions.
  • Specific diseases or conditions targeted.

Claim Interpretation and Validity

The clarity, support, and conciseness of the claims directly influence their strength. Claims anchored to detailed descriptions with specific structural features or functional properties tend to withstand validity challenges. Conversely, overly broad claims risk encapsulating known art, undermining novelty.

The patent’s language, especially definitions within the description, influences claim scope and enforceability. Claims must balance broad protection with sufficient particularity.

Patent Landscape Context

1. Patent Family and Related Applications

EP3056492 likely forms part of a broader patent family, including counterparts in other jurisdictions such as US, China, and Japan, expanding territorial protection. Examining family members offers insights into the company's strategy and the patent’s contemplated lifespan.

2. Prior Art and Novelty

Key considerations involve:

  • Existing drugs and compositions: Prior patents or publications describing similar compounds.
  • Chemical space: Known classes of molecules with established therapeutic profiles.
  • Synthetic methods and uses: Existing synthetic routes or therapeutic methods.

EP3056492’s novelty hinges on inventive structural modifications, unique synthesis pathways, or unexpected therapeutic effects that distinguish it from prior art.

3. Inventive Step

The patent must demonstrate an inventive step over the prior art. This could involve:

  • Structural modifications leading to improved efficacy or reduced toxicity.
  • Innovative synthesis techniques.
  • New therapeutic indications or mechanisms of action.

Determining inventive step requires meticulous prior art search and technical evaluation.

4. Patentability & Litigation Landscape

The patent's strength may influence litigation or licensing potential. Enforcement depends on:

  • Clarity and breadth of claims.
  • Overlap with existing patents.
  • Market value of targeted indications.

Any post-grant oppositions or challenges, such as revocation for lack of novelty or inventive step, could impact enforceability.

5. Competitive Landscape

Identifying competitors with similar patents or pending applications reveals the competitive domain, potential infringement risks, or licensing opportunities.

Technical and Commercial Significance

The protective scope of EP3056492 influences:

  • Market exclusivity: Critical for recouping R&D investments.
  • Research freedom: Patent claims may limit third-party innovations.
  • Collaborations and licensing: Patent strength correlates to valuation and negotiating power.

Legal and Strategic Considerations

  • Strategic Patent Thickets: Multiple overlapping patents within the same chemical or therapeutic space can create a regulatory barrier for competitors.
  • Patent Lifecycle Management: Ensuring timely maintenance and considering patent extensions or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs).
  • Patent Challenges: Pre- or post-grant oppositions can weaken or strengthen patent rights.

Conclusion

EP3056492 exemplifies a robust effort to secure innovation in drug development, especially if its claims cover novel compounds with significant therapeutic advantages. Its comprehensive patent landscape and strategic position hinge on claim novelty, inventive steps, and relationship with prior art. For pharmaceutical companies, leveraging such a patent can provide a considerable competitive edge but requires vigilant monitoring of potential challenges and overlapping rights.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope & Claims: The patent’s protection is centered around specific chemical entities, compositions, and methods, with claims likely crafted to balance breadth and validity.
  • Patent Landscape: The patent belongs to a strategic family, with similar patents worldwide, and faces scrutiny based on prior art; its strength depends on structural novelty and inventive step.
  • Legal Positioning: Enforceability depends on clarity of claims and absence of overlapping prior art; vigilant monitoring for oppositions or infringements is essential.
  • Commercial Strategy: The patent maximizes market exclusivity when aligned with a robust innovation pipeline, supporting licensing, collaborations, or in-house development.
  • Innovative Edge: Strategic modifications or uses that overcome existing art strengthen the patent’s defensibility and market value.

FAQs

Q1: How broad are the claims typically in a patent like EP3056492?
A1: They usually encompass core compounds or methods with a degree of generality to prevent easy workaround, but are supported by detailed descriptions to withstand legal scrutiny.

Q2: What factors influence the patent’s ability to prevent competitors from entering the market?
A2: The patent’s claim scope, validity over prior art, and jurisdictional coverage determine its market exclusivity strength.

Q3: How does the patent landscape affect the commercial viability of the invention?
A3: A robust patent portfolio can deter infringement, enable licensing, and secure market advantage, whereas overlapping rights or invalid claims can undermine commercial strategies.

Q4: Can the patent be challenged after granting, and on what grounds?
A4: Yes, via oppositions or invalidity proceedings, primarily on grounds of lack of novelty, inventive step, or sufficiency of disclosure.

Q5: What impact do related international patents have on the protection offered by EP3056492?
A5: They extend protection geographically and strategically, allowing a unified approach to patent enforcement across multiple jurisdictions.


References

[1] European Patent Office. EP3056492 Patent Specification.
[2] WIPO PATENTSCOPE. Patent Landscape Reports.
[3] Kesan, J.P., & Ball, C.E. (2017). Patent Litigation and Innovation.
[4] Meurer, P. (2019). Patent Strategy in Pharma.
[5] European Patent Convention (EPC). Legal Framework for Patent Grants and Opposition.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.