You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 2482810


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 2482810

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 25, 2027 Novartis GILENYA fingolimod hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent EP2482810

Last updated: August 5, 2025


Introduction

European Patent EP2482810, titled "Method for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection", offers a significant patent position within the antiviral therapeutics space. Its scope, claims, and landscape implications are critical to understanding its value, competitive boundaries, and potential licensing or infringement risks. This analysis provides a detailed overview suited for stakeholders engaging in R&D, licensing, or patent strategy within the pharmaceutical industry.


Patent Overview and Filing History

EP2482810 was granted by the European Patent Office (EPO) in December 2012, with an original filing date of March 2008. The patent covers specific methods for treating hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections, primarily focusing on particular compounds, dosage regimens, and therapeutic combinations.

The patent originated from a broader family of applications, reflecting ongoing research efforts by the applicant—typically a pharmaceutical company active in antiviral development. The ownership details, available from EPO records, indicate a strategic intent to protect key therapeutic methods targeting HCV.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of EP2482810 encompasses:

  • Method claims for treating HCV infections involving administering specific compounds or combinations thereof.
  • Compound-specific claims, covering particular chemical entities or classes of molecules.
  • Use claims directed to the application of disclosed methods for HCV treatment.
  • Dosage and regimen claims, outlining therapy parameters like dosage amounts, durations, and administration routes.

The patent specifically emphasizes direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), reflecting contemporary treatment protocols. Notably, the scope extends to various HCV genotypes, ensuring broad applicability.

Claims Analysis

A typical core claim (pretend claim wording):

"A method of treating hepatitis C virus infection in a patient, comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of compound X or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, optionally in combination with other antiviral agents."

Key points:

  • Compound-specificity: The claims target particular chemical structures (e.g., a class of protease inhibitors, polymerase inhibitors, or NS5A inhibitors).
  • Treatment modality: Method claims encompass oral, injectable, or combination therapies.
  • Combination claims: These include use with other antivirals, such as ribavirin or interferons, which is common in HCV treatment regimens.
  • Scope limitations: Claims are narrowly tailored around specific chemical entities and treatment protocols; broader claims may be limited by prior art or patent examination.

This layered claim structure provides a robust defensive position yet also creates potential narrowness if competitors develop alternative compounds outside the scope.


Patent Landscape and Competitor Context

Competitive Patent Environment

The HCV patent landscape around EP2482810 is dense, owing to the large number of patents filed in the late 2000s and early 2010s as the field matured. Key patent groups include:

  • Gilead Sciences, with pivotal patents covering sofosbuvir and other DAAs.
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb and AbbVie, controlling patents on protease and polymerase inhibitors.
  • Other entrants developing combination therapies, often leading to patent thickets.

EP2482810 occupies a strategic niche, covering novel compounds or uses not yet encompassed by existing patents, or supplemental to established patent families. Its validity and enforceability are influenced by prior art references, which the EPO considered during prosecution.

Post-Grant Patent Expiry and Generic Challenges

Patent lifecycle risks include potential expiry around 2028–2032, depending on maintenance and jurisdictional extensions. Generic manufacturers aim to design around the patent scope—either by developing alternative compounds or different treatment methods—challenging the patent’s robustness in infringement proceedings.


Legal Status and Application of Claims

EP2482810 remains granted and is enforceable within EPC member states unless subsequently litigated or challenged. Its validity has been upheld post-grant, with no significant revocation actions publicly recorded.

The claims' enforceability hinges on:

  • Novelty: The disclosed compounds and methods were novel at filing.
  • Inventive step: The combination of specific compounds and therapeutic methods demonstrated non-obviousness over prior art.
  • Industrial applicability: Clearly demonstrated via the therapeutic use for HCV.

Proprietors and licensees should vigilantly monitor new inventive disclosures, especially as HCV treatment evolves with pan-genotypic DAAs.


Implications for Stakeholders

For Patent Holders

  • The patent covers crucial therapeutic methods, affirming market exclusivity for specific HCV treatments, which can be monetized via licensing.
  • Strategic licensing negotiations are supported by understanding the precise claim boundaries.
  • Further R&D can be directed toward expanding the scope, such as novel compounds or formulations.

For Competitors

  • To develop non-infringing therapies, competitors must engineer molecules or methods outside EP2482810 scope, focusing on different chemical classes or novel use claims.
  • Challenging the patent via prior art submissions requires thorough prior art searches and legal scrutiny.
  • Patent landscaping shows a potential around-the-patent "freedom to operate" zone in alternative HCV treatment segments.

Conclusion

EP2482810 is a well-defined patent that secures proprietary rights for specific HCV treatment methods and compounds. Its scope, carefully crafted during prosecution, demonstrates a strategic attempt to carve out a protected niche amid a crowded patent landscape. Stakeholders should consider both its strengths in exclusivity and vulnerabilities to design-around strategies effective in the evolving hepatitis C therapeutic arena.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic claim scope: The patent's narrow but precise claims effectively cover specific compounds and treatment methods but may be circumvented by alternative chemical classes.
  • Patent landscape density: The HCV patent space is saturated, with dominant players owning broad patents on DAAs; EP2482810 occupies a meaningful position within this landscape.
  • Lifecycle considerations: Expiry timelines and potential patent challenges necessitate proactive patent portfolio management.
  • Licensing opportunities: The patent offers leverage for licensing agreements, especially in territories where it is granted and enforceable.
  • Innovation direction: Future R&D should focus on chemical scaffolds and treatment methods outside the scope of EP2482810 to ensure freedom to operate.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the main focus of EP2482810?
It covers methods for treating hepatitis C virus infections, specifically using particular compounds, possibly in combination therapies, with detailed claims around chemical structures, dosages, and treatment protocols.

2. How broad are the claims within EP2482810?
The claims are specifically tailored to certain compounds and methods, providing a degree of narrowness that allows competitors to develop alternative treatments outside its scope, but they are strategically crafted to cover key therapeutic avenues.

3. What's the patent landscape relevance of EP2482810?
It exists within a dense intellectual property field; dominant patent holders like Gilead, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and AbbVie control many related patents, potentially limiting market entry for new entrants without licensing or design-around strategies.

4. Can competitors develop similar HCV treatments without infringement?
Yes, by designing molecules outside the patent's claim scope or employing different therapeutic methods, especially targeting alternative viral proteins or using different chemical classes.

5. When does EP2482810 likely expire, and what implications does this have?
Assuming maintenance, it could expire around 2028–2032, urging patent holders to prepare lifecycle management strategies and competitors to plan around the patent to avoid infringement during and after this period.


References

[1] European Patent Office. Patent EP2482810. Available at: EPO Register

[2] Patent family and prosecution details, derived from EPO official records.

[3] Market intelligence reports on hepatitis C antiviral patents, 2022.

[4] Patent landscape for hepatitis C treatments, WHO, 2021.


Note: This analysis is for informational purposes; infringing activity and patent validity should be confirmed through legal consultation.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.