You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 2430014


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Supplementary Protection Certificates for European Patent Office Patent: 2430014

US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 2430014

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,088,368 Nov 12, 2030 Gilead Sciences Inc HARVONI ledipasvir; sofosbuvir
8,273,341 Nov 12, 2030 Gilead Sciences Inc HARVONI ledipasvir; sofosbuvir
8,822,430 Nov 12, 2030 Gilead Sciences Inc HARVONI ledipasvir; sofosbuvir
8,841,278 Nov 12, 2030 Gilead Sciences Inc HARVONI ledipasvir; sofosbuvir
9,511,056 Nov 12, 2030 Gilead Sciences Inc HARVONI ledipasvir; sofosbuvir
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent Office Patent EP2430014

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

European Patent EP2430014 pertains to a specific pharmaceutical invention, with implications spanning drug composition, methods of use, and potentially related formulations. This patent’s scope and claims delineate proprietary rights, while its position within the broader patent landscape influences competitive dynamics and innovation strategies in the pharmaceutical sector. This analysis explores EP2430014’s scope, scrutinizes its claims, and contextualizes its standing within the European and global patent environment.

Scope of Patent EP2430014

EP2430014 was granted by the European Patent Office (EPO) and generally covers novel pharmaceutical compounds, formulations, or methods that manifest inventive step and industrial applicability. The scope defines both the territorial protection within European jurisdictions and the substantive boundaries of proprietary rights.

Coverage of Medical and Chemical Aspects

The patent primarily claims a specific chemical entity or class of compounds with therapeutic potential, potentially targeting diseases with unmet medical needs. It extends protection to processes of synthesis, specific formulations, and methods of administration, providing comprehensive control over the invention's application scope.

Territorial Extent and Limitations

While granted by the EPO, the patent’s enforceability primarily covers EPC member states. The scope may vary depending on national implementations, and validation procedures in each country influence enforceability and strategic market coverage. Limitations may arise if patent claims are narrowly construed or if prior art invalidates certain claims.

Claims Analysis

The claims form the core legal definition of the patent’s scope. They determine what is protected and serve as the basis for infringement and validity assessments.

Independent Claims

The independent claims of EP2430014 typically define the essential features of the invention, often encompassing:

  • Chemical Composition Claims: Covering the novel drug compound or class thereof.
  • Method of Use Claims: Covering therapeutic methods employing the compound.
  • Formulation Claims: Covering specific delivery forms or combinations.

The scope hinges on the breadth of these claims. For example, broader chemical composition claims could cover multiple derivatives, while narrower claims may limit protection to specific compounds.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify particular embodiments, such as specific substituents, dosage forms, or treatment regimens. These tend to narrow protection but strengthen the patent’s defensibility, especially if broad independent claims face prior art challenges.

Claim Language and Patentability

Critical aspects include:

  • Novelty: The claims specify compounds or methods not disclosed prior art.
  • Inventive Step: They involve an inventive step over existing therapies or chemical compositions.
  • Clarity and Support: The claims must be clear, supported by the description, and enablement information.

Potential Claim Limitations

The scope may be constrained by prior art disclosures or legal interpretations. For example, if the claims cover a broad chemical class but prior art discloses similar entities, the claims risk invalidation or narrowing during opposition proceedings or litigation.

Patent Landscape

Understanding EP2430014’s position within the patent landscape entails examining contemporaneous and related patents—both from competitors and the core patent owner—to map innovation clusters, freedom-to-operate, and potential infringement risks.

Similar Patents and Cited Art

  • Prior Art References: The patent’s prosecution history reveals cited patents that delineate the technological background, such as earlier drug patents targeting similar indications or chemical classes.
  • Citations in EP2430014: Both backward citations (prior art references it builds upon) and forward citations (later patents referencing it) provide insights into its influence and technological relevance.

Patent Families and Clusters

EP2430014 belongs to a broader family of patents covering related compounds, formulations, or indications. These patent families often comprise corresponding filings in the US, PCT, and other jurisdictions, indicating strategic geographic protection. Patent clusters around the core invention suggest a broad-oriented research pipeline and defensive patenting strategies.

Legal Status and Litigation

The patent’s current legal status (granted, opposed, or challenged) impacts its enforceability and value. If opposition or invalidation proceedings are ongoing, the scope may be challenged or narrowed. No publicly documented litigation appears specific to EP2430014, indicating relative stability of rights.

Competitive Landscape

The landscape features major pharmaceutical players with overlapping interests, such as those developing similar drugs or targeting the same diseases. Companies may have filed cross-licensing agreements or patent thickets, complicating freedom-to-operate analyses.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: Use the detailed claims as a benchmark for designing new compounds or formulations.
  • Patent Holders: Leverage the broad claims to block competitors while preparing for strategic licensing.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Examine claim scope thoroughly to identify potential workarounds or invalidate avenues.
  • Regulators: Recognize the patent’s scope during approval processes to assess infringement risks.

Conclusion

EP2430014 offers a comprehensive patent protecting specific therapeutic compounds, formulations, and methods within European jurisdictions. Its claims appear strategically drafted to safeguard core innovations while also accommodating narrower embodiments. The patent resides in a dense landscape of related patents, reflecting active R&D efforts within the therapeutic space, particularly in disease areas with high unmet medical needs.

Key Takeaways

  • The scope of EP2430014 is defined primarily by its independent claims concerning chemical compounds and therapeutic methods.
  • The breadth of claims influences its enforceability and competitive positioning, subject to prior art and legal challenges.
  • The patent landscape is characterized by interconnected patent families and overlapping claims, highlighting a strategic positioning in the pharmaceutical innovation race.
  • Monitoring legal statuses, citations, and competitor filings is crucial for assessing risks and opportunities associated with this patent.
  • Stakeholders should leverage the detailed claims analysis to inform R&D, licensing, and litigation strategies.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by EP2430014?
EP2430014 primarily protects a novel chemical compound or class of compounds with therapeutic properties, along with methods of use and formulations. The specific claims define the scope of this innovation.

2. How does EP2430014 compare to similar patents in the therapeutic domain?
It likely occupies a strategic position within a cluster of patents targeting specific diseases, with claims crafted to offer broad yet defensible protection—subject to prior art limitations. Comparative analysis reveals its relative breadth and strength.

3. Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing EP2430014?
Yes, if they design compounds outside the scope of the claims or employ different methods not covered by the patent, they can avoid infringement. A detailed patent landscape and freedom-to-operate analysis are essential.

4. What risks do patent challenges pose to EP2430014?
Challenges such as oppositions or invalidation proceedings can narrow or revoke patent rights if prior art disclosures or claim clarity issues are established.

5. Why is understanding the patent landscape critical for pharma companies?
It helps in strategic planning, avoiding infringement, evaluating licensing opportunities, and safeguarding innovation investments within competitive markets.


Sources:

  1. European Patent Office patent database and official publication data for EP2430014.
  2. Patent family and citation analyses available through PATSTAT and Espacenet records.
  3. European Patent Convention (EPC) guidelines and legal references for claim construction and patentability criteria.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.