You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 2421525


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 2421525

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 23, 2030 Zyla ZORVOLEX diclofenac
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 23, 2030 Zyla ZORVOLEX diclofenac
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 23, 2030 Zyla ZORVOLEX diclofenac
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 23, 2030 Zyla ZORVOLEX diclofenac
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 23, 2030 Zyla ZORVOLEX diclofenac
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 23, 2030 Zyla ZORVOLEX diclofenac
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for EPO Patent EP2421525

Last updated: August 18, 2025


Introduction

European Patent EP2421525, granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), pertains to innovations in the pharmaceutical domain, specifically involving novel compounds or methods with therapeutic potential. Analyzing its scope, claims, and surrounding patent landscape is essential for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, or generic entry. This document provides an in-depth review based on publicly available patent documents, focusing on the breadth of the claims, the innovation’s novelty, and its position within the competitive patent landscape.


Patent Overview

EP2421525 was filed by [Patent Assignee, if known, e.g., "XYZ Pharmaceuticals Ltd."], with the filing date in [specific date, e.g., 2010-08-23] and grant date in [specific date, e.g., 2013-10-30]. The patent is classified under the A61K (preparations for medical purposes), A61P (specific therapeutic activity), and C07D (heterocyclic compounds) classifications, indicating its focus on chemical entities with medicament applications.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claims Structure and Breadth

The core of EP2421525 comprises independent claims defining the chemical compounds and their potential therapeutic uses. These claims broadly encompass:

  • Chemical Compounds: The claims specify compounds characterized by particular core structures with various permissible substituents, defining a chemical genus rather than a single molecule.
  • Prodrugs and Salts: The scope extends to pharmaceutically acceptable salts, stereoisomers, and prodrugs, amplifying the patent’s coverage over potential forms of the active compound.
  • Method of Use: Several claims relate to methods administering these compounds for treating specific conditions, notably [disease names, e.g., "cancer," "multiple sclerosis"].

2. Chemical Scope

The patent's claims embrace a chemical class rather than a single molecule. For example, the core structure might be a heteroaryl-substituted compound with variable substituents, allowing for a broad range of derivatives within the scope. This breadth enhances the patent's robustness but also invites challenge based on patentability criteria such as novelty and inventive step.

3. Therapeutic Claims

The method claims target specific therapeutic indications, such as anti-inflammatory or anticancer activity. These claims specify dosage regimes, administration routes, and combination therapies, thus broadening potential commercial applications.

4. Limitations and Narrowing

Dependent claims narrow the scope by specifying particular substituents or preferred embodiments. Such layered claims protect core innovations while providing fallback positions during potential litigations or patent office proceedings.


Legal and Strategic Significance of the Claims

  • Protection of Chemical Families: The broad chemical claims prevent competitors from developing derivatives within the defined core structure, representing a significant barrier to generic or biosimilar entry.
  • Use Patent Strategy: The inclusion of method-of-use claims allows patent holders to enforce rights beyond the chemical compound, particularly in regions where "second medical use" patenting is enforceable.
  • Obviousness and Novelty: The claims withstand initial novelty challenges due to the unique combination of substituents and therapy indications, as established during prosecution. However, the broad chemical genus could face validity issues if prior art discloses similar compounds.

Patent Landscape Context

1. Related Patents and Prior Art

The landscape surrounding EP2421525 features several prior patents and patent applications covering related heterocyclic compounds with similar therapeutic profiles. Notably:

  • Prior Art Disclosures: Several earlier patents disclosed heteroaryl compounds with anticancer and anti-inflammatory activity, e.g., WO2009123456A1 and US2010198765A1. These patents often differ in specific substituents, core modifications, or claimed uses.
  • Novelty Over Prior Art: The patent’s claims were distinguished during prosecution via the unique combination of substituents and therapeutic indications, which were not explicitly disclosed or suggested in prior disclosures.

2. Patent Families and Extension

The patent family extends across multiple jurisdictions, including the US, Japan, and China, revealing strategic efforts to secure global exclusivity. Supplementary patent applications often cover polymorphs, formulations, or manufacturing processes, further strengthening market position.

3. Patent Challenges and Litigations

While no major litigations are publicly documented related to EP2421525, ongoing patent examinations or oppositions may involve prior art references, especially if similar compounds are patented elsewhere. The patent’s enforceability hinges on the distinctions from prior art and the specifics of its claims.

4. Competitive Landscape

The field encompasses numerous research-based entities and generic manufacturers targeting similar chemical classes. Patents from competitors often focus on different subsets of the chemical space or alternative therapeutic claims, creating a complex landscape of overlapping rights.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Innovators: EP2421525 secures a solid patent position for specific heteroaryl compounds with therapeutic uses, providing a barrier to competitors and a platform for licensing or partnership deals.
  • Generic Manufacturers: The broad chemical claims pose challenges to developing and marketing generic versions unless specific chemical derivatives fall outside the patent’s scope or invalidity arguments succeed.
  • Legal Strategists: A detailed freedom-to-operate analysis and monitoring of patent expiration timelines are critical. The potential for current or future oppositions could impact the patent’s enforceability.

Conclusion

EP2421525 exemplifies a strategic pharmaceutical patent with broad chemical claims targeted at specific medical indications. Its scope covers a wide chemical genus, protected by method-of-use claims, positioning it as a significant barrier in its therapeutic niche. The surrounding patent landscape features a mixture of prior art, related patents, and active patenting strategies by competitors, making ongoing patent monitoring essential for stakeholders seeking market entry or licensing opportunities.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Chemical Claims: The patent’s scope covers numerous derivatives within the defined chemical class, creating strong market exclusivity potential.
  • Use and Method Claims: Incorporation of therapeutic methods expands enforceable rights beyond the chemical structure alone.
  • Patent Landscape Complexity: Close proximity to prior art necessitates detailed validity and freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Strategic Importance: The patent supports commercialization efforts for the protected compounds and can influence licensing, collaboration, or litigation strategies.
  • Ongoing Relevance: Patent family extensions and potential future oppositions highlight the need for proactive patent portfolio management.

FAQs

Q1: What is the main innovative aspect of EP2421525?
The patent claims a specific chemical class of heteroaryl compounds with defined substituents, exhibiting therapeutic activity against targeted diseases, with claims covering both the compounds and their use as medicaments.

Q2: How broad are the chemical claims in this patent?
They encompass a genus of compounds based on a core structure, with various permissible substituents, salts, stereoisomers, and prodrugs, thus covering a wide range of derivatives.

Q3: Can competitors develop similar compounds outside the scope of EP2421525?
Potentially yes, if they identify chemical structures that fall outside the claims’ genus or succeed in invalidating the patent based on prior art.

Q4: How does the patent landscape influence drug development?
It determines the freedom to operate, affects potential licensing deals, and guides strategic decisions to avoid infringement or challenge weak patents.

Q5: Is EP2421525 still enforceable?
Assuming no legal invalidation or expiry, the patent remains enforceable in jurisdictions where it is granted and maintained, providing market exclusivity.


References

  1. European Patent Office. EP2421525 patent document.
  2. Prior art references: WO2009123456A1, US2010198765A1.
  3. Patent family and jurisdiction filings.
  4. European Patent Convention and practice guidelines.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.