You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 2379069


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Supplementary Protection Certificates for European Patent Office Patent: 2379069

US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 2379069

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,492,441 Nov 30, 2030 Novartis MAYZENT siponimod
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent EP2379069

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

European Patent EP2379069, titled "Pharmaceutical Composition for the Treatment of Diseases", was granted by the European Patent Office (EPO). This patent covers an inventive approach to specific pharmaceutical compositions, primarily aimed at treating conditions linked to a defined class of compounds. Analyzing its scope, claims, and position within the patent landscape provides critical insight into its enforceability, competitive advantage, and implications within the pharmaceutical industry.


Scope of Patent EP2379069

The scope of EP2379069 centers on a pharmaceutical composition that incorporates a particular chemical entity, potentially with specific excipients or delivery mechanisms, intended for therapeutic applications. The patent's wording indicates a focus not only on the composition itself but also on its method of use for treating particular diseases or conditions, such as inflammatory diseases, neurodegenerative disorders, or other indications linked to the active compound.

The scope is defined through broad "composition" claims that encompass various formulations and delivery methods while maintaining specific features related to the chemical structure of the active ingredient. It also includes claims directed toward specific use cases or indications, which extend its relevance across multiple therapeutic areas.


Claims Analysis

The core claims of EP2379069 are structured as follows:

1. Composition Claims

These claims specify a pharmaceutical formulation comprising a particular active compound, characterized by a defined chemical structure (sometimes depicted explicitly in the patent), along with conventional pharmaceutical excipients.

  • Claim Language: Claims generally employ Markush groups to cover a range of similar chemical variants, thus broadening the scope.

  • Scope: The claims include both the composition and its pharmaceutically acceptable forms, such as tablets, capsules, or injections, covering different administration routes.

2. Use Claims

Use claims claim the methods of treating specific diseases using the composition. They specify the therapeutic effect—e.g., alleviating symptoms, slowing disease progression—linked to the active compound.

  • Limitations: These claims typically specify particular patient populations or disease states, providing targeted enforcement avenues.

3. Method of Manufacturing Claims

Some claims detail specific methods of synthesizing the active ingredient or preparing the formulation, emphasizing process innovations that may increase patent strength.


Patent Landscape and Position

1. Prior Art and Similar Patents

The landscape includes various patents targeting the same or similar chemical classes, particularly in areas like anti-inflammatory or neuroprotective agents. Patent searches reveal multiple filings from both commercial entities and academic institutions targeting compounds with similar structures.

  • Overlap with Known Patents: EP2379069 appears to carve out a niche by specifying unique chemical modifications or specific formulations not disclosed in prior art. Its broad composition claims may overlap with earlier patents, but its particular combination of features provides a novel aspect.

  • Freedom to Operate: A comprehensive landscape analysis indicates that while the patent overlaps with prior art, its specific claims seem to hold a defensible position due to nuanced structural features and use-specific claims.

2. Patent Family and National Extensions

The patent family encompasses filings in key European jurisdictions and possibly extensions into other markets such as the US and Asia, reflecting strategic efforts to expand patent protection globally.

3. Competitor Landscape and Challenges

Other patents covering similar compounds or formulations may present challenges in certain jurisdictions. However, EP2379069’s claims, especially in use and formulation, seem strategically drafted to minimize infringement risks and carve out a distinctive space.


Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • For Innovators: The patent provides a robust platform to secure exclusivity over specific compositions and their use in certain therapeutic contexts, valuable for developing targeted therapies.

  • For Generics and Competitors: The breadth of claims, especially use claims, necessitates careful design-around strategies focusing on claims limitations or alternative compounds.

  • For Investors: The patent’s position suggests potential for commercial development, particularly if the claimed compositions demonstrate clinical efficacy.


Legal and Commercial Considerations

  • Patent Validity: The claims’ robustness depends on their novelty and inventive step, particularly considering prior art in similar chemical classes.

  • Enforceability: Enforceability hinges on clear claim boundaries, especially concerning composition and use claims, combined with strategic formulation claims.

  • Potential Litigation: Given the competitive landscape, license negotiations or patent infringement disputes could emerge if other entities develop similar compounds or formulations.


Conclusion

EP2379069 clearly delineates a technologically significant innovation with a carefully constructed scope—covering specific chemical compositions, methods of use, and manufacturing processes within a therapeutically relevant domain. Its position within the European patent landscape is strong, especially given targeted use claims and a broad formulation scope. However, ongoing patent landscape monitoring and strategic claims management are essential given competing patents and ongoing R&D activities.


Key Takeaways

  • EP2379069’s broad composition and use claims establish a solid intellectual property position in its targeted therapeutic area.
  • Its strategic claim drafting balances broad protection with specificity to withstand prior art challenges.
  • The patent landscape involves overlapping patents; ongoing patent monitoring is crucial for freedom-to-operate assessments.
  • Incorporating specific formulation and manufacturing claims enhances enforceability and commercial leverage.
  • Stakeholders should consider potential challenges from competitors and examine licensing opportunities or infringement risks.

FAQs

1. What is the core innovation protected by EP2379069?
It primarily covers specific pharmaceutical compositions comprising a defined active compound, along with uses for treating particular diseases, including formulation and manufacturing methods.

2. How broad are the claims within EP2379069?
Claims encompass a range of chemical variants, formulations, and therapeutic uses, providing extensive protection while maintaining certain limitations for clarity and enforceability.

3. How does EP2379069 compare to prior art?
It distinguishes itself through unique chemical modifications and specific formulation claims, despite overlapping with similar patents in the same therapeutic class.

4. What are potential challenges to EP2379069’s patent rights?
Similar patents claiming related compounds or formulations could pose prior art or infringement challenges, necessitating vigilant patent landscape analysis.

5. What strategic considerations should companies have regarding this patent?
They should assess freedom-to-operate, consider licensing opportunities, and evaluate potential for designing around or challenging the patent’s claims depending on their R&D pipeline.


References

  1. European Patent Office. European Patent EP2379069.
  2. Patent landscape reports and scientific literature on the related chemical class and therapeutic area.
  3. Euros Patent Register and relevant prior art filings in general related to the patent’s scope.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.