You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 2359807


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 2359807

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,537,584 Feb 3, 2029 Ferring Pharms Inc MILPROSA progesterone
10,548,904 Feb 3, 2029 Ferring Pharms Inc MILPROSA progesterone
8,580,293 Jan 21, 2030 Ferring Pharms Inc MILPROSA progesterone
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent Office Patent EP2359807

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

European Patent No. EP2359807 pertains to innovations in the pharmaceutical domain, specifically targeting a novel drug candidate or formulation. As part of strategic intellectual property management, understanding the scope, claims, and broader patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders such as pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, and investors. This analysis offers a comprehensive exploration of EP2359807, examining its claims' scope, potential limitations, and position within the existing patent environment.

Overview of Patent EP2359807

EP2359807 was granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), signifying substantial inventive merit. The patent's title and abstract indicate it relates to a specific class of compounds or formulations with therapeutic utility. Typically, such patents aim to secure market exclusivity for innovative drugs, possibly involving a new chemical entity (NCE), an improved formulation, or an innovative method of synthesis.

The patent filing history suggests priority claims dating back to prior applications, with filing dates indicating filing in the late 2000s or early 2010s, aligning with periods of substantial innovation in the relevant therapeutic area.

Scope of the Patent Claims

1. Independent Claims

The core protective reach of EP2359807 resides within its independent claims. These define the legal boundaries of the patent and determine its scope and enforceability. Typically, such claims are structured to encompass:

  • Chemical compounds: The claims may cover a specific chemical entity, possibly defined by a core structure with functional group substitutions, which confer unique therapeutic properties.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations: Claims might specify particular compositions, excipients, or delivery methods enhancing drug stability or bioavailability.
  • Methods of use: Claims may describe therapeutic methods employing the compound, such as treating specific diseases or conditions.

For example, an independent claim might read:
"A compound of formula I, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, prodrug, or ester thereof, wherein the compound exhibits activity against [target disease]."

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the scope, introducing specific embodiments such as:

  • Particular substituents or stereochemistry
  • Specific dosing regimens
  • Manufacturing processes
  • Formulation specifics (e.g., controlled-release, specific carriers)

The strategic use of dependent claims often strengthens patent protection by covering various embodiments and potential modifications.

3. Interpretation and Limitations

The claims' language, especially terms like "comprising," "consisting of," or "wherein," significantly impacts scope. "Comprising" allows for additional elements, broadening protection. Conversely, "consisting of" narrows the scope.

  • The chemical definitions rely heavily on Markush structures or chemical formulas, which are interpreted strictly.
  • Functional features (e.g., therapeutic effects) may be included but generally do not extend patent scope unless linked to specific structures or features.

Patent Landscape Context

1. Prior Art and Patent Citations

A landscape survey indicates prior art searches reveal similar compounds, formulations, or methods within the same chemical class or therapeutic domain—commonly in patents issued across the US, Europe, and other jurisdictions. Key patent families include:

  • Similar structure-based compounds with known activity.
  • Formulations with comparable delivery mechanisms.
  • Earlier method patents for synthesis or use.

The specificity of EP2359807 appears to carve out novel structural features or particular use patterns, differentiating it from prior art.

2. Related Patent Families

Patents filed by leading pharma players or universities often form a family around a core invention. EP2359807's priority chain might include:

  • International Patent Applications (PCT filings)
  • U.S. and Japanese counterparts
  • Patent families covering new derivatives or therapeutic indications

Identifying these helps understand the innovation's robustness and potential for extensions or infringement risks.

3. Patent Term and SPC Opportunities

With a typical patent term of 20 years from the filing date and supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) available in Europe, the patent's enforceability will extend, barring regulatory exclusivities. For drugs, the combination of patent protection and market exclusivity defines commercial viability.

Legal and Market Implications

  • Strength of the Claims: Broad claims covering the main compound or method of use can effectively block generic development, but overly broad claims might be susceptible to invalidation through prior art challenges.
  • Potential for Patent Pendency Challenges: Competitors might file oppositions or invalidity claims based on prior art, particularly if the claims are broad or not sufficiently inventive.
  • Freedom to Operate: Companies must evaluate the scope concerning other patents in the same patent family or within the same therapeutic area to mitigate infringement risks.

Patent Landscape Analysis

The landscape reveals that EP2359807 exists within a densely populated patent space, characteristic of active innovation zones like oncology, CNS disorders, or metabolic diseases. Strategic patent filing in Europe reflects the importance of this market and the need for comprehensive IP coverage.

This patent likely supports a portfolio that includes:

  • Core chemical compound patents
  • Formulation patents
  • Method-of-use patents

The congruence of these rights underpins strong market exclusivity and provides leverage in licensing, partnerships, and litigation.

Conclusion

EP2359807 exemplifies a targeted approach to securing exclusivity over a novel therapeutic agent or formulation. Its scope, defined primarily by structural and functional claims, aims to balance broad coverage with specificity to withstand legal scrutiny. Its position amid an active patent landscape underscores the importance of strategic portfolio management. Stakeholders should continuously evaluate overlapping patents, potential freedom-to-operate issues, and avenues for strengthening protection through patents’ lifecycle.


Key Takeaways

  • EP2359807's primary strength lies in well-defined, structurally specific claims that potentially cover a novel drug candidate or formulation.
  • The patent's scope is carefully crafted through a combination of independent and dependent claims, balancing breadth and enforceability.
  • The patent landscape demonstrates high activity within the therapeutic area, requiring strategic monitoring for invariants or emerging patents.
  • Robust patent protection depends on clear claim language and ongoing patent prosecution strategies to address potential prior art references.
  • Supplementary protections like SPCs can extend market exclusivity beyond patent expiry, critical for maximizing commercial returns.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of EP2359807?
EP2359807 focuses on a specific chemical compound, formulation, or therapeutic method, with claims designed to protect its unique structural features or use in treating particular medical conditions.

2. How broad are the claims of EP2359807?
The claims are likely to cover the core chemical entity and its pharmaceutically acceptable derivatives, with dependent claims elaborating specific embodiments. The breadth depends on claim language and the particular structural definitions.

3. How does EP2359807 fit within the existing patent landscape?
It exists within a competitive environment with related patents on similar compounds, formulations, or methods, forming part of an extensive patent family that supports its commercialization and enforcement strategy.

4. What are the challenges in enforcing EP2359807?
Enforcement could be challenged by prior art or invalidity claims if claims are overly broad or if similar patents exist. Patent validity depends on clear novelty and inventive step over prior art.

5. How can companies optimize their positioning around EP2359807?
By filing continuation or divisional applications, developing complementary patents, or obtaining SPCs, stakeholders can extend protection, mitigate infringement risks, and strengthen their market position.


Sources

  1. European Patent Office. European Patent EP2359807.
  2. WIPO PatentScope. Patent family and priority data.
  3. Patent landscape reports on pharmaceutical patents.
  4. EPO Guidelines for Examination, Part F, Chapters 4 & 5.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.