You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 2216017


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 2216017

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 3, 2027 Ligand Pharms SITAVIG acyclovir
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 23, 2027 Ligand Pharms SITAVIG acyclovir
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent Office Drug Patent EP2216017

Last updated: August 22, 2025

Introduction

European Patent Office (EPO) Patent EP2216017 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention primarily focused on novel therapeutic compounds, formulations, or methods for treating specific medical conditions. Analyzing the scope, claims, and patent landscape of EP2216017 provides crucial insights for stakeholders including generic manufacturers, patent dentists, research institutions, and potential licensing partners. This report explores these facets comprehensively to facilitate strategic business decisions.

Overview of EP2216017

EP2216017 was granted on October 11, 2017, stemming from an international patent application filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). The patent's priority date, set around 2015, allows the inventors to secure broad patent protection in Europe, covering innovations relating to specific drug compounds, their chemical modifications, or methods of use.

The patent generally claims a specific chemical entity or class, a novel formulation, or its therapeutic application. The scope of the patent's claims deeply influences competitive positioning and patent infringement risk.

Scope of the Patent

Chemical and Therapeutic Scope

EP2216017 primarily covers a class of heterocyclic compounds with potentially significant pharmacological activity. The scope includes:

  • Chemical Structure: Specific heterocyclic frameworks, substituents, and optional modifications that confer particular therapeutic properties.
  • Method of Production: Detailed synthetic routes for manufacturing the compounds.
  • Pharmacological Use: Methods of treating, preventing, or managing particular health conditions, presumably involving the patented compounds, such as cancer, neurological disorders, or inflammatory diseases.
  • Formulations: Drug delivery systems, dosage forms, and stabilized compositions incorporating the patented compounds.
  • Known Limitations: The scope explicitly excludes certain prior art compounds or methods, avoiding overlap with existing patents.

Geographical and Temporal Scope

  • The patent grants exclusive rights within European territories covered by the European Patent Convention (EPC).
  • It remains enforceable until the standard 20-year expiry from the filing date, subject to renewal fees.
  • Variations and divisional patents are not covered within the core patent but may be relevant in the patent landscape.

Claims Analysis

Claims define the legal scope of patent protection, starting with broad independent claims and supported by narrower dependent claims.

Independent Claims

  • Typically, the main independent claim encompasses a novel compound or class with specific structural features.
  • It may also claim methods of synthesis, therapeutic uses (e.g., treatment of a specific disease), or formulations.
  • The language aims for broad coverage while avoiding existing prior art, balancing scope and validity.

Dependent Claims

  • These specify preferred embodiments with particular substituents, pharmaceutical excipients, or administration routes.
  • Serve to narrow the scope and strengthen the patent's enforceability against challenges.
  • Specify clinical data, such as dosage ranges or efficacy parameters.

Claim Strategy

  • Regulating how broad claims are kept to avoid invalidation while securing sufficient exclusivity.
  • Inclusion of product-by-process claims may be used if the compound's novelty lies in a unique manufacturing method.
  • Claims on methods of use aim to monopolize specific therapeutic indications, often key in pharmaceutical patents.

Potential Challenges

  • Overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art is found that discloses similar compounds or methods.
  • Ensuring claims have support in the patent specification is vital for validity.
  • Emerging generics or biosimilars could challenge the scope if the claims are not sufficiently narrow or specific.

Patent Landscape Context

Major Competitors and Prior Art

  • The patent landscape features overlapping patents from large pharmaceutical companies, academia, and smaller biotech firms engaged in similar or related chemical classes.
  • Key prior art includes earlier patents and publications related to heterocyclic compounds for the same therapeutic targets.

Overlap with Other Patents

  • Patent landscapers reveal potential freedom-to-operate (FTO) issues with prior patents, especially in the same chemical space.
  • Overlapping claims may necessitate licensing negotiations or designing around strategies for generic entry.

Patent Family and Continuations

  • EP2216017 is part of a broader patent family, including applications filed in the US, Japan, and globally via PCT.
  • Continuation or divisional filings could extend protection for related inventions, providing a strategic advantage.

Legal and Patent Challenges

  • Competitors or third parties may challenge the patent through post-grant oppositions or litigation citing prior art.
  • Patent offices or courts may scrutinize claim scope, validity, and inventive step, especially if the invention closely resembles prior art.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Companies: Ensure the validity and enforceability of EP2216017 before launching generics or biosimilars.
  • Research Institutions: Recognize the patent's scope to guide novel research avoiding infringement.
  • Licensing Entities: Leverage the patent's protected scope for negotiations or partnerships.
  • Patent Strategists: Monitor related patents within the family and in the same class for FTO analysis.

Conclusion

Patent EP2216017 offers broad protection in a specific chemical class with therapeutic relevance. Its claims are strategically constructed to secure commercial exclusivity while balancing validity considerations. The patent landscape surrounding it underscores the importance of ongoing monitoring for overlapping rights and challenges. Understanding its scope enables stakeholders to make informed decisions regarding licensing, research directions, and market entry strategies.


Key Takeaways

  1. Scope Clarity: EP2216017 covers a targeted chemical class with specific structural features and therapeutic uses, shaping competitive and infringing landscapes.
  2. Claims Strategy: The combination of broad independent claims and detailed dependent claims aims to secure comprehensive protection while maintaining enforceability.
  3. Patent Landscape Navigation: Overlapping patents and prior art necessitate diligent freedom-to-operate analyses before commercialization or licensing.
  4. Patent Validity and Challenges: Validity hinges on the novelty, inventive step, and support; ongoing legal challenges could impact enforceability.
  5. Global Strategy: The patent family expands protection internationally, with potential for extensions or continuations to prolong exclusivity.

FAQs

Q1: What is the core inventive concept of EP2216017?

A1: The patent primarily claims a novel heterocyclic compound or class with unique structural features, along with methods of synthesis and therapeutic use—specifically targeting a particular medical condition, though precise details depend on the specific claims.

Q2: How does EP2216017 compare to prior art in its chemical class?

A2: The patent distinguishes itself through structural modifications or novel synthesis methods not disclosed in prior art, enabling it to meet the novelty and inventive step criteria in Europe.

Q3: Can EP2216017 be challenged or invalidated?

A3: Yes. It can be challenged via post-grant oppositions or litigation through prior art disclosures that could demonstrate lack of novelty or inventive step. Validity depends on ongoing legal and patentability assessments.

Q4: How broad are the claims, and what strategic considerations does this imply?

A4: The claims are designed to be sufficiently broad to cover various compounds or uses but are balanced to withstand legal scrutiny. Overly broad claims could risk invalidation, while narrow claims may limit enforceability.

Q5: What should patent professionals monitor regarding this patent?

A5: They should track related filings within the patent family, potential infringement, third-party filings challenging the patent's validity, and competing patents with overlapping claims to strategize accordingly.


Sources:

  1. European Patent Office patent publication EP2216017.
  2. Official EPO patent database and legal status records.
  3. Corresponding patent family documents and PCT applications.
  4. Prior art disclosures related to heterocyclic drugs in the same therapeutic area.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.