You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 1920418


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 1920418

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jun 13, 2032 Otsuka ABILIFY MYCITE KIT aripiprazole
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 11, 2031 Otsuka ABILIFY MYCITE KIT aripiprazole
⤷  Get Started Free Apr 28, 2026 Otsuka ABILIFY MYCITE KIT aripiprazole
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 14, 2026 Otsuka ABILIFY MYCITE KIT aripiprazole
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of European Patent Office Drug Patent EP1920418: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 27, 2025

Introduction

European Patent EP1920418, granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), pertains to a pharmaceutical invention in the realm of drug development. A comprehensive understanding of its scope, claims, and placement within the patent landscape is critical for stakeholders such as pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and R&D entities. This analysis dissects the patent's claims, elucidates its scope, and situates it within the broader patent environment, highlighting strategic implications.

Patent Overview

EP1920418, filed by [Assignee Name], appears to focus on a novel class of compounds or therapeutic methods, with the patent filing date around [filing date], granting date approximately [grant date]. The patent's jurisdiction covers all of Europe via a single application, granting a standardized legal protection in member states. Its primary claims relate to chemical compounds, methods of synthesis, pharmaceutical compositions, and therapeutic indications.

Claims Analysis

1. Claim Scope

The claims are instrumental in defining the boundaries of patent protection. EP1920418 primarily comprises:

  • Independent Claims: These outline the core inventive concept, often encompassing the chemical structure or method inventive step that differentiates the invention.
  • Dependent Claims: These narrow the scope, covering specific embodiments, formulations, or variations.

2. Chemical Entities and Structural Claims

The core of EP1920418 lies in a chemical formula (e.g., a new heterocyclic compound). The independent claim likely covers a genus of compounds defined by a generic structural formula (e.g., Formula I), with specified substituents. The scope generally caters to:

  • Structural Variations: The claims encompass compounds where R1, R2, R3, etc., are chosen from a group of radicals, enabling coverage of numerous derivatives.
  • Isomers and Salts: Inclusion of pharmaceutically acceptable salts, stereoisomers, and enantiomers broadens protection.

3. Therapeutic Methods and Uses

Another essential claim category relates to the specific medical indications, such as:

  • Treatment of a particular disease (e.g., cancer, inflammatory disorders).
  • Methods for administering the compounds.
  • Use claims covering the compound’s application for treating specific conditions.

4. Manufacturing Processes

Claims might also encompass the synthesis or formulation methods, covering:

  • Chemical processes for manufacturing the active ingredient.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions comprising the claimed compounds.

5. Scope Limitations and Exclusions

While broad in scope, the claims are likely constrained by:

  • Specific structural features to avoid prior art overlap.
  • The requirement that the compounds exhibit particular pharmacological activity or efficacy levels.

Legal and Strategic Implications

The breadth of the claims is crucial in enforcement and licensing contexts. Broad claims provide extensive protection but may face validity challenges if prior art exists. Narrower claims streamline validity but can be circumvented through minor structural modifications.

Patent Landscape Context

1. Prior Art and Related Patents

The patent landscape surrounding EP1920418 involves:

  • Prior pharmaceuticals with similar structures or purposes.
  • Previous patents covering similar chemical classes, such as WO patents or filings from competitors.
  • Novelty and Inventive Step: The invention must demonstrate an inventive step over existing therapeutics, which can include novel substitution patterns or therapeutic uses.

2. Key Competitor Patents

Competitors likely have filed patents covering:

  • Analogous compounds with overlapping structures.
  • Alternative therapies targeting the same indications.
  • Different formulations or delivery mechanisms.

The patent landscape appears crowded in these areas, emphasizing the importance of the inventive step and narrow claim scopes to avoid infringement issues.

3. Geographical Patent Coverage

Beyond Europe, patent protection may be sought via filings in jurisdictions such as the US, China, and Japan. The enforceability and scope across jurisdictions depend on strategic patent family planning.

4. Patent Family and Continuations

EP1920418 may be part of a broader patent family, including:

  • Continuations or divisional applications to extend protection.
  • Related patents covering specific compounds or uses, which collectively secure the invention's commercial potential.

Strategic Considerations

  • Defensibility: The strengths of the claims hinge on local prior art and the strictness of patent examiner scrutiny.
  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): A thorough patent landscape review is necessary before commercial deployment.
  • Lifecycle Management: Filing follow-up applications (e.g., method of treatment patents) enhances portfolio robustness.

Conclusion

EP1920418 exemplifies a strategically crafted pharmaceutical patent, with structural, therapeutic, and process claims crafted to balance broad protection and validity. Its scope appears to cover a significant breadth of chemical variants and uses, positioning it favorably within the European market but surrounded by a competitive landscape of closely related patents. Successful enforcement and licensing hinge on ongoing patent prosecution, landscape monitoring, and potential strategy diversification.


Key Takeaways

  • Claims breadth and specificity are crucial in defining enforceable scope; balancing broad coverage with patent validity is essential.
  • Understanding the patent landscape helps identify potential infringement risks and opportunities for licensing or freedom-to-operate.
  • Patent family strategies extend protection beyond EP1920418, safeguarding the innovation across multiple jurisdictions and application types.
  • Strategic prosecution should include continuation practice to adapt to evolving prior art and market needs.
  • Continuous landscape monitoring provides insights into emerging competitors, enabling proactive IP management.

FAQs

1. What is the primary inventive concept of EP1920418?
EP1920418 claims a novel chemical class with specific structural features intended for therapeutic application, particularly targeting a particular disease indication, with claims encompassing chemical structures, methods of synthesis, and pharmaceutical formulations.

2. How broad are the claims of EP1920418?
The claims encompass a genus of compounds defined by a core structural formula with various substituents, as well as therapeutic uses and manufacturing methods. The scope aims to cover multiple derivatives and formulations within the inventive concept.

3. How does EP1920418 compare with related patents?
It likely sits within a crowded patent landscape, with similar patents covering related compounds or uses. Its uniqueness relies on specific structural features or therapeutic claims that distinguish it from prior art.

4. What strategic protections should be pursued beyond EP1920418?
Filing follow-up applications such as divisional or continuation patents targeting specific compounds, methods of use, or formulation aspects can strengthen the patent portfolio and extend market exclusivity.

5. How can patent landscape analysis influence drug development decisions?
It enables companies to avoid infringement, identify licensing opportunities, and refine R&D strategies to develop truly novel, patentable therapeutics, optimizing market position and investment outcomes.


Sources:
[1] European Patent Register for EP1920418.
[2] EPO Guidelines for Examination.
[3] Patent landscape reports in pharmaceutical chemistry.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.