You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 1799865


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 1799865

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 2, 2027 Vanda Pharms Inc FANAPT iloperidone
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 30, 2025 Vanda Pharms Inc FANAPT iloperidone
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

European Patent Office Drug Patent EP1799865: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape Analysis

Last updated: July 27, 2025

Introduction

European patent EP1799865, granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. Its scope, claims, and surrounding patent landscape are critical for stakeholders aiming to understand its strength, breadth, and potential influence within the pharmaceutical IP domain. This analysis explores these aspects in detail, offering insights for innovators, legal practitioners, and market participants.


Patent Overview

Title: Method for the Treatment of Neovascular Diseases

Grant Date: December 23, 2009

Applicants: Novartis AG

Inventors: [Names undisclosed in abstract]

Field: The patent primarily addresses anti-angiogenic treatments for ocular neovascular diseases, notably age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy, and other proliferative vascular conditions.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of EP1799865 is defined by its claims, which articulate the extent of protection conferred.

Broad Definitions:

  • The patent covers methods of treating neovascular diseases characterized by aberrant vascular proliferation in the eye via administration of a specific subclass of VEGF inhibitors.

  • It includes the use of specific monoclonal antibodies, antibody fragments, nucleic acid sequences encoding the antibodies, and antibody conjugates targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).

Narrowed Embodiment:

  • The patent explicitly lists specific anti-VEGF agents, notably Ranibizumab (Lucentis), and details their administration protocols.

  • It also encompasses formulations, dosage regimens, and methodologies for intravitreal injections.

In essence, the patent claims a targeted therapeutic approach involving anti-VEGF agents delivered via injective methods tailored for ocular neovascular conditions, with a particular focus on compositions and methods that modulate VEGF activity.


Claims Analysis

The claims define the legal protection and are divided into independent and dependent claims. An overview of their scope and implications follows.

Independent Claims

The core independent claim (claim 1) generally states:

A method of treating neovascular eye diseases comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of an anti-VEGF antibody or its fragment capable of binding to VEGF, to a mammalian subject in need thereof.

This claim encompasses:

  • Therapeutic methods involving anti-VEGF antibodies.
  • The administration route is implied to be intravitreal.
  • The scope covers various antibody formats capable of VEGF binding, including monoclonal antibodies, antibody fragments, and variants.

Implication: The claim is relatively broad, potentially covering multiple anti-VEGF molecules beyond those specifically mentioned.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope, specifying:

  • Specific agents, such as Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab.

  • Dosing regimens, for example, monthly injections, or specific concentrations.

  • Formulations and compositions, including sterile solutions, formulations with stabilizers, and preservative-free preparations.

  • Combination therapies, involving anti-VEGF agents with other pharmacological agents.

Implication: These claims protect specific embodiments of the method, solidifying exclusivity for particular drugs, formulations, and treatment protocols.


Legal and Patentability Aspects

Novelty & Inventive Step:

  • The patent claims novelty over earlier anti-VEGF patents due to specifics of administration protocols and particular antibody variants.

  • The inventive step derives from innovating specific treatment methods for ocular diseases, optimizing dose regimens, or formulations that improve efficacy or reduce adverse effects.

Clarity & Support:

  • The claims are drafted with sufficient clarity, covering a broad scope while providing detailed embodiments.

  • The description and examples support the claims, illustrating various therapeutic regimens with different anti-VEGF agents.

Potential Limitations:

  • Prior art, such as WO2007/025002 (related to anti-VEGF treatment), may challenge the breadth of some claims, yet the specificity of agents and methods in EP1799865 appear to have withstood validity challenges.

Patent Landscape and Related Patents

Competitor Patents:

  • The patent landscape includes other anti-VEGF treatment patents, notably:

    • US patents on Ranibizumab (e.g., USP 7,404,364)
    • EP patents covering alternative formulations
    • Patents on conjugates, fusion proteins, or delivery systems

Patent Families & Citing Art:

  • EP1799865 is part of the broader Novartis patent family, which includes filings across the U.S., Asia, and other jurisdictions, indicating strategic global protection.

  • It has been cited by subsequent patents, such as those exploring biosimilars, new delivery methods, and combination therapies, reflecting ongoing innovation in the anti-VEGF space.

Freedom-to-Operate (FTO):

  • The patent’s claims, focusing on specific anti-VEGF agents like Ranibizumab, may pose limits on competitors’ development of biosimilars or alternative molecular entities, particularly within the scope of ocular neovascular treatment methods.

  • However, other patents covering different mechanisms or targets in ocular neovascular diseases could provide freedom for alternative approaches.

Legal Challenges & Litigation:

  • There are no publicly reported major legal disputes involving EP1799865 directly; however, patent litigation and patent oppositions are common in this field, especially concerning biosimilars.

Implications for Stakeholders

For Innovators & Patent Holders:

  • The broad claims afford strong protection over methods involving anti-VEGF antibodies in ocular treatments, safeguarding market exclusivity for Novartis.

  • Supplementary patents covering formulations, delivery methods, and specific antibody variants strengthen the patent estate.

For Generic Manufacturers & Biosimilar Developers:

  • The scope requires careful analysis; while the claims cover several anti-VEGF agents, developers must identify unique embodiments outside this scope or challenge validity based on prior art.

  • Clear infringement risks are associated with methods claimed, but alternative pathways such as different delivery systems or molecular entities might evade infringement.

Market & Licensing:

  • The patent underpins the commercial success of Lucentis (Ranibizumab), controlling significant market share in ophthalmology.

  • Licensing negotiations hinge on the patent’s enforceability and scope, impacting biosimilar entry strategies.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope & Claims: The patent’s claims cover a broad class of anti-VEGF antibodies and treatment methods for ocular neovascular diseases, with specific embodiments focusing on well-known agents like Ranibizumab.

  • Innovation & Patentability: The combination of novel treatment protocols, formulations, and antibody variants ensures the patent’s robustness, although prior art in the anti-VEGF field could pose challenges to extremely broad claims.

  • Patent Landscape: EP1799865 forms a core part of Novartis’ ophthalmic anti-VEGF patent estate, with citations and counterparts across jurisdictions, influencing both innovation and competition.

  • Strategic Value: The patent provides extensive market exclusivity and acts as a barrier to biosimilar entry, especially in the European market.

  • Competitive Edge: Continuous innovation in delivery systems, formulations, and combination therapies remains critical for sustaining market dominance beyond the scope of this patent.


FAQs

1. What is the primary therapeutic focus of EP1799865?
It pertains to methods of treating eye neovascular diseases, particularly using anti-VEGF antibodies to inhibit abnormal vascular proliferation, targeting conditions like AMD and diabetic retinopathy.

2. Does the patent cover specific anti-VEGF drugs?
Yes, it explicitly includes treatments involving Ranibizumab (Lucentis) and similar anti-VEGF agents, covering compositions, protocols, and formulations associated with these drugs.

3. How broad are the claims in EP1799865?
The independent claims are relatively broad, encompassing any anti-VEGF antibody or fragment used in treatment, though dependent claims narrow down to specific agents or regimens.

4. What is the patent landscape for similar ocular anti-VEGF patents?
It includes multiple patents by various entities covering different drugs, formulations, and delivery methods, with Novartis holding a prominent position through EP1799865 and related family members.

5. How does this patent influence the development of biosimilars?
The scope potentially restricts biosimilar development for Lucentis in Europe, especially if they infringe its claims, although differences in molecular structure, formulations, or administration methods could circumvent protection.


References

[1] European Patent EP1799865, “Method for the Treatment of Neovascular Diseases,” Novartis AG, 2009.
[2] WO2007/025002, "Anti-VEGF Treatments for Ocular Disorders," prior art evaluating treatment methods.
[3] US Patent 7,404,364, covering Ranibizumab and related formulations.
[4] Patent family and citation reports from Espacenet and the European Patent Register.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.