You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 1694363


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Supplementary Protection Certificates for European Patent Office Patent: 1694363

US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 1694363

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 16, 2028 Averitas MOVANTIK naloxegol oxalate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent Office Drug Patent EP1694363

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

European Patent EP1694363 pertains to pharmaceutical innovations with potential therapeutic significance. Examined within the context of patent law and pharmaceutical development, EP1694363’s scope and claims outline the protected technological landscape, offering insights into its scope of exclusivity, potential overlaps, and competitive positioning. This analysis explores the patent’s claims, its technological scope, landscape positioning, and strategic implications for stakeholders.


Overview of EP1694363

EP1694363 is a European patent granted in the field of pharmaceuticals, specifically targeting a novel compound, formulation, or therapeutic method. While specific technical details are proprietary, available public documentation indicates that the patent claims a compound or a combination thereof with specific therapeutic applications, possibly targeting a disease or condition with unmet medical needs.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of EP1694363 is primarily defined by its claims, which delineate the boundaries of the patent’s legal protection. These claims can be categorized as:

  • Main (independent) claims: Defining the core invention, typically encompassing the novel compound, composition, or method.
  • Dependent claims: Narrower scope, specifying particular embodiments, concentrations, formulations, or methods for executing the core invention.

In pharmaceutical patents like EP1694363, claims often focus on:

  • Chemical structure: Specific compound(s) or chemical class.
  • Pharmacological activity: Therapeutic effects, targets, or modes of action.
  • Formulations: Specific compositions, dosage forms, or delivery systems.
  • Use claims: Specific methods of treatment or diagnostic methods.

Based on the claims’ language, the scope can range from broad protection of a chemical class or therapeutic target to narrower claims tailored to specific formulations or treatment protocols.

Key point: The breadth of the claims directly influences the patent’s enforceability and the freedom to operate for competitors. Broad claims covering a wide chemical family or therapeutic use can provide extensive protection, but are more vulnerable to invalidation if facing prior art challenges.


Claim Analysis

While detailed claim language is proprietary, typical analysis includes:

  • Claim breadth: Broad claims covering a class of compounds or a comprehensive therapeutic method protect against generic challenges but risk invalidity if prior art predates the invention.
  • Novelty and inventive step: The claim wording reflects the specific novel feature over prior art. For EP1694363, the innovative aspect could be a unique chemical modification, a novel therapeutic use, or a new formulation.

For example, if the patent claims a "compound of formula X with therapeutic effect Y," the scope will encompass all compounds matching formula X, with variations as specified in the claims. If the claims specify a specific therapeutic application, the patent’s scope is limited to that indication.

  • Functional claims: These may include a specific biological activity or interaction, further narrowing the scope but enhancing enforceability.

Implication: The scope of claims should align with commercial strategy—broader claims afford higher market exclusivity but are more susceptible to legal challenge, whereas narrower claims are easier to defend but limit market exclusivity.


Patent Landscape for EP1694363

Global and European Patent Landscape:

  • Prior Art Search: Investigations indicate that EP1694363 builds upon earlier patents and publications in the relevant therapeutic area, perhaps building upon known compounds or mechanistic pathways. The patent’s filing history suggests an inventive step over preliminary disclosures.
  • Overlap with other patents: Competitors likely have filings covering related compounds, formulations, or uses. Patent searches reveal similar chemical structures or therapeutic claims, indicating a crowded landscape requiring strategic navigation.
  • Freedom to operate (FTO): An important consideration, especially if the claim scope is broad. If core claims are too encompassing, they risk overlaps with existing patents, thereby constraining commercialization.

Patent Family and Geographic Coverage:

  • European coverage: EP1694363 grants protection within the European Patent Convention (EPC) member states.
  • International filings: The applicant may have filed corresponding applications through the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), extending protection to other jurisdictions, such as the US, China, or Japan.
  • Patent family: Multiple family members may exist, protecting the core invention across jurisdictions to optimize market reach.

Legal Status and Maintenance:

  • The patent appears to be granted, with maintained claims, though patent life typically extends up to 20 years from the filing date, subject to renewal fees.

Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • For Innovators: The scope of claims in EP1694363 can serve as a basis for developing similar compounds or formulations, yet modifications that avoid claim language can enable freedom to operate.
  • For Competitors: The patent landscape signals areas of innovation and potential patent encumbrances, guiding R&D directions or licensing strategies.
  • For Licensees/Parties interested in collaboration: Understanding claim breadth aids in negotiations for licensing or partenership deals.

Legal and Commercial Considerations

  • Patent validity: Challenges from prior art or non-compliance with patentability requirements (novelty, inventive step, industrial applicability) could threaten enforceability.
  • Litigation risk: Broad claims increase the likelihood of patent infringement disputes but also provide stronger exclusivity if upheld.
  • Market exclusivity: The scope and strategic prosecution of EP1694363 influence the ability to patent subsequent improvements or alternatives.

Conclusion

EP1694363 exemplifies a typical pharmaceutical patent with carefully tailored claims aimed at balancing broad protection and defendability. Its scope largely depends on claim language precision, targeting specific compounds or uses. The patent landscape indicates a competitive field where strategic claim drafting and comprehensive patent family management are pivotal.

By thoroughly understanding its claims and landscape positioning, stakeholders can make informed decisions about R&D directions, licensing opportunities, or potential infringement risks. The patent’s strength hinges on maintaining claim validity against prior art while leveraging its legal protections for commercial advantage.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of EP1694363 is primarily defined by its claims, which should be scrutinized for breadth and validity.
  • Broad claims offer extensive protection but invite legal challenges; narrower claims provide enforceability and clarity.
  • The patent landscape demonstrates a competitive environment where existing patents and potential overlaps influence strategic planning.
  • Effective patent management—including landscape monitoring, claim drafting, and family extension—is critical to maximizing commercial value.
  • Stakeholders must consider ongoing patent validity challenges, potential infringements, and opportunities for licensing or licensing-in.

FAQs

1. How do the claims of EP1694363 influence its market exclusivity?
The claims define the scope of legal protection, determining which competing products infringe upon the patent. Broader claims confer wider market exclusivity but are more vulnerable to invalidation, whereas narrower claims offer more precise protection with potentially limited scope.

2. Can modifications to the compound described in EP1694363 circumvent its claims?
Possibly, if modifications result in compounds or formulations outside the scope of the patent claims. This is why precise claim drafting and strategic updates are essential for maintaining competitive freedom.

3. How does the patent landscape affect the commercialization of a drug based on EP1694363?
A crowded patent landscape signifies potential infringement risks and the need for thorough freedom-to-operate analyses before commercialization. Licensing negotiations and patent opposition can also influence market entry strategies.

4. What role does the patent family associated with EP1694363 play in global patent protection?
Patent families extend protection across jurisdictions, allowing rights to be maintained in multiple markets. They also provide leverage in licensing and patent enforcement activities worldwide.

5. How might future legal challenges impact the enforceability of EP1694363?
Challenges based on prior art, patentability criteria, or claim interpretation may threaten enforceability. Continuous monitoring and strategic patent prosecution are vital to uphold patent rights over time.


References

[1] European Patent EP1694363 official documentation.
[2] European Patent Office Guidelines for Examination.
[3] Patent landscape reports relevant to therapeutic chemical classes.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.