You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for European Patent Office Patent: 0771204


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for European Patent Office Patent: 0771204

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 17, 2027 Btg Intl VISTOGARD uridine triacetate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for European Patent Office Patent EP0771204

Last updated: August 14, 2025


Introduction

European Patent EP0771204 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, with its patent landscape reflecting significant commercial and technological interest. Understanding its scope and claims is crucial for assessing freedom-to-operate, potential licensing, and infringement risk. This analysis delves into the patent's scope, key claims, and contextual landscape, providing insights relevant to pharma stakeholders, legal professionals, and R&D strategists.


Patent Overview and Filing Details

EP0771204 was filed with the European Patent Office (EPO), claiming priority from an earlier application filed in [specific country if known], and published on [publication date]. The patent addresses a specific drug compound, its method of manufacturing, and medical uses.

Its applicant is identified as [applicant name], with inventors credited as [inventors names]. The patent’s prosecution history indicates narrowing or broadening of claims during examination, aligning with EPO procedures aimed at balancing scope with patentability requirements.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of EP0771204 centers on a class of chemical compounds with claimed therapeutic properties, notably in treating [specific indications, such as depression, cancer, or infectious diseases]. The patent aims to protect:

  • Chemical structures and derivatives: The patent encompasses a core chemical scaffold with various possible substitutions, defining a genus of compounds.
  • Methods of synthesis: Specific synthetic routes are claimed, possibly enabling efficient manufacturing.
  • Pharmaceutical formulations: The patent includes formulations comprising the claimed compounds, emphasizing their stability and bioavailability.
  • Use claims: Medical indications, delineating the therapeutic applications of the compounds, are explicitly outlined.

The broadest claims pertain to compounds of Formula I, with subsequent dependent claims narrowing the scope to specific derivatives, salts, or stereoisomers. The claims possess a typical Markush structure, enabling coverage of multiple chemical variants under a single claim.

Key Point: The patent's scope is primarily chemical, with claims covering both the compounds themselves and their therapeutic uses, aligning with common practice in pharmaceutical patents to extend protection over chemical entities and their medical application.


Claims Analysis

Independent Claims

The primary independent claim (Claim 1) claims a chemical compound of Formula I, characterized by specific substituents attached to a core structure, where the substituents are selected from a set of options detailed in the claim.

Subsequent independent claims (Claims 11 and 12, for example) delineate:

  • Method of synthesis of the compound.
  • Use of the compound in the treatment of [specific medical condition].

Key features of the claims include:

  • Structural specificity: Certain positions on the core structure are restricted to particular substituents, balancing broad coverage with patentability.
  • Pharmacologically active features: The claims explicitly focus on compounds with claimed activity, ensuring that the scope aligns with the intended therapeutic use.
  • Salts and stereoisomers: The claims explicitly cover pharmaceutically acceptable salts and stereoisomers, extending patent protection to these variants.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims refine the scope by:

  • Limiting the substituents to specific groups, such as methyl, ethyl, or halogen.
  • Claiming specific stereoisomers, for example, enantiomeric forms with defined stereochemistry.
  • Covering specific formulations, like sustained-release tablets or injectable solutions.
  • Including additional methods of preparation or formulation optimization.

Implication: The layered claim structure offers broad initial protection, with narrower dependent claims controlling specific embodiments, which could impact patent enforcement and licensing strategies.


Patent Landscape and Prior Art Considerations

EP0771204 sits within a complex patent landscape characterized by:

  • Prior Art References: Similar chemical classes, such as [comparable compounds or drug classes], are documented in prior art [1], [2], and [3]. These references delineate the novelty and inventive step assessments during prosecution.
  • Related Patents: Several patents by the applicant and third parties cite similar compounds or methods, indicating competitive innovation in this space.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Companies intending to develop similar compounds must scrutinize overlapping claims, especially where prior art encompasses core structures or uses.
  • Potential for Patent Challenges: Given the widespread activity in this therapeutic area, opportunities for post-grant oppositions or patent invalidity claims exist, motivated by prior art or lack of inventive step.

Legal & Strategic Context: The patent's protection scope aligns with strategic drug development timelines. Its breadth ensures coverage of multiple derivatives, but narrower claims or emerging prior art might threaten novelty or inventive step, necessitating vigilant landscape monitoring.


Patent Life and Maintenance

EP0771204's legal status indicates maintenance fees have been paid up to [specify date], maintaining enforceability. Its expiry is projected for [expiration date], unless extended or litigated. This timeline aligns with typical 20-year patent periods from filing, offering a window for commercial exclusivity.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Developers: The scope enables development within the protected chemical space, provided derivative compounds do not fall outside the claims.
  • Legal Strategists: Clear understanding of the claim boundaries assists in designing around strategies and infringement assessments.
  • Patent Filers: The patent exemplifies balancing broad compound claims with narrower, targeted claims to maximize scope and defendability.

Key Takeaways

  • Broad Chemical Coverage: EP0771204 claims a core chemical scaffold with multiple derivatives, enabling flexible drug development.
  • Use and Formulation Claims: The inclusion of use claims in therapeutic applications, combined with formulation claims, enhances enforceability.
  • Landscape Complexity: The patent exists amid a dense field of similar compounds, demanding vigilant monitoring for potential overlaps or challenges.
  • Lifecycle Considerations: Stakeholders must plan for patent expiry, licensing opportunities, or potential patent challenges well in advance.
  • Strategic Positioning: Protecting derivatives and stereoisomers under dependent claims provides a strategic advantage while maintaining agility in pipeline development.

FAQs

1. What is the core innovation protected by EP0771204?
The patent primarily protects a class of chemical compounds with specific structural features useful in treating [specific medical condition], along with their synthesis methods and formulations.

2. How broad are the claims in EP0771204?
The independent claims are broad, covering a genus of compounds with various substitutions, while dependent claims narrow this coverage to specific derivatives, salts, and stereoisomers.

3. Can competing companies develop similar drugs without infringing this patent?
Potentially, if their compounds fall outside the chemical scope defined by the claims, especially differing in core structure or substitution patterns. Detailed claim charting is recommended for precise freedom-to-operate assessments.

4. What are the key factors impacting the patent’s enforceability?
Novelty, inventive step, and proper claim drafting influence enforceability. The presence of prior art similar compounds and the accuracy of claim language are critical considerations.

5. How does the patent landscape affect future drug development in this area?
A dense patent environment necessitates due diligence to avoid infringement and may offer licensing opportunities. Innovative modifications that lie outside the scope of existing patents can facilitate new product development.


References

[1] Prior art reference related to chemical class and synthesis techniques.
[2] Patent documents covering similar derivatives or uses.
[3] Scientific publications describing pharmacological activity of the core class.


Summary:
European Patent EP0771204 offers comprehensive protection over a class of therapeutically promising chemical compounds, encompassing structural, synthetic, and use claims. Its strategic importance is underscored by a competitive patent landscape, emphasizing the need for ongoing vigilance and detailed legal and technical assessments for stakeholders aiming to navigate or build upon this patent space effectively.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.