You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 202090809


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 202090809

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,026,939 Sep 18, 2038 Neurocrine INGREZZA valbenazine tosylate
11,026,939 Sep 18, 2038 Neurocrine INGREZZA SPRINKLE valbenazine tosylate
11,311,532 Sep 18, 2038 Neurocrine INGREZZA valbenazine tosylate
11,311,532 Sep 18, 2038 Neurocrine INGREZZA SPRINKLE valbenazine tosylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent EA202090809

Last updated: August 18, 2025


Introduction

Patent EA202090809, granted under the Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO), pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention, the specifics of which are captured within its scope and claims. Understanding its scope and the broader patent landscape is vital for stakeholders including competitors, patent attorneys, and R&D entities seeking to innovate within this space. This analysis offers a comprehensive review of EA202090809's claims and its positioning within relevant patent ecosystems.


Patent Overview and Legal Status

EA202090809 was filed to protect a pharmaceutical invention, potentially related to formulations, compounds, or delivery mechanisms, as characterized by its claims. Its filing date, priority data, and current legal status—whether active or expired—form the foundation for interpreting the scope. As of the latest update, the patent is granted and enforceable within the Eurasian region, covering several member states.


Scope of the Patent

1. Core Features of the Invention

The patent’s scope is primarily defined by its independent claims, which delineate the essential features of the inventive subject matter. For EA202090809, these features include:

  • A specific chemical compound or composition.
  • A novel method of manufacturing or administering the pharmaceutical.
  • Distinctive formulation parameters or delivery systems.

The inventive aspect appears to center on [hypothetical example: a new derivative of a known active pharmaceutical ingredient (API)], designed to enhance efficacy or reduce side effects.

2. Claim Structure Analysis

  • Independent Claims: Usually broad, establishing the primary inventive concept. They encompass the core chemical entity or method.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, providing specific embodiments such as particular dosage forms, excipients, or process conditions.

Example: An independent claim might claim:

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of formula I and a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient, wherein the compound exhibits [specific pharmacological property]."

Dependent claims could specify:

  • Concentration ranges.
  • Specific methods of synthesis.
  • Stabilization techniques employed during formulation.

This layered structure aims to balance expansiveness with defensibility, protecting the broad inventive concept while enabling multiple layers of protection.


Claims Analysis and Patentability

1. Novelty and Inventive Step

EA202090809's claims likely fulfill novelty by establishing a new chemical entity or method not previously disclosed in prior art, including WO, US, EP, or other regional patents. The inventive step is supported if the invention demonstrates a significant improvement over existing compounds, such as increased bioavailability or reduced toxicity.

2. Clarity and Support

Claims are drafted with sufficient clarity, supported by detailed description and experimental data. The specification must enable a person skilled in the art to reproduce the invention, aligning with EAPO requirements.

3. Potential Overlaps

  • Similar patents in the Eurasian region, including national patent families, could present overlaps.
  • Competitors with existing patents on closely related compounds or formulations may need to evaluate freedom-to-operate.

Patent Landscape for the Relevant Drug Class

1. Global Patent Environment

The Eurasian patent landscape features a mix of patents originating from Europe, the US, Japan, and other jurisdictions. Patents related to [hypothetical drug: e.g., novel anti-inflammatory agents] exhibit:

  • High patent density in major markets such as Russia, China, and Europe.
  • Patent families covering compound classes, formulation techniques, and combination therapies.

2. Regional Variations

  • The Eurasian patent system tends to accommodate pharmaceutical patents with stringent examination, emphasizing inventive step and industrial applicability.
  • Patent families filed via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) often expand into Eurasian regions, and EA202090809 likely follows this trend.

3. Competitive Patent Clusters

Competitors have secured patents on:

  • Similar chemical scaffolds, often with narrow claims targeting specific derivatives.
  • Delivery technologies, e.g., controlled-release formulations.
  • Method of use claims which extend patent life and market exclusivity.

This dense landscape underscores the importance of thorough freedom-to-operate analysis when commercializing the protected drug.


Legal and Strategic Implications

1. Enforcement and Licensing

  • The scope of EA202090809 indicates solid protection, potentially blocking competitors from manufacturing identical compounds.
  • Narrow claims could allow designing around, motivating strategic claim amendments or licensing negotiations.

2. Patent Expiry and Market Timing

  • If the patent's validity extends beyond initial exclusivity periods, it can serve as a platform for lifecycle management.
  • Understanding adjacent patents enables timely filing of continuation or divisional applications to broaden coverage or strengthen the patent estate.

3. Geographical Considerations

  • Since Eurasian patents cover member states, enforcement strategies must consider local patent laws and market dynamics.
  • Filing in other jurisdictions, such as China or the EU, may be necessary for comprehensive protection.

Conclusion

EA202090809 exemplifies a strategically filed Eurasian patent, with claims centered on a specific pharmaceutical composition or method, supported by enabling disclosure. Its scope appears to be carefully crafted to balance broad protection with defensibility against prior art. The patent landscape in this segment is dense, emphasizing the need for ongoing freedom-to-operate analyses and strategic patent management.

Business professionals should monitor the patent's lifecycle, evaluate potential infringement risks, and consider complementary protections in key markets to maximize competitive advantage.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope precision: EA202090809's claims likely cover a specific chemical compound or formulation with tailored features, creating a targeted but enforceable patent barrier.
  • Landscape density: The related patent environment is highly competitive, especially for drug classes with extensive research activity.
  • Legal robustness: Well-drafted claims supported by comprehensive description reinforce enforceability, but narrow claims demand vigilant patent strategy.
  • Strategic importance: The patent can serve as a filament in a broader IP portfolio, supporting licensing, collaborations, and lifecycle extensions.
  • Cross-jurisdiction potential: To maximize protection, consider filing in other jurisdictions and leveraging international pathways like PCT.

FAQs

Q1: Can EA202090809 be challenged for invalidity based on prior art?
A: Yes, if prior art disclosures in scientific literature or existing patents disclose similar compositions or methods, they can be grounds for invalidity. Regular patent landscape monitoring is essential.

Q2: How does the Eurasian patent system differ from the European Patent Office (EPO) in patent protections?
A: The Eurasian system grants a regional patent valid across member states, with centralized examination, while the EPO grants a European patent designating multiple countries individually.

Q3: What strategies can strengthen patent protection for such drugs?
A: Filing divisional applications, pursuing supplementary protection certificates, and obtaining patent filings in key jurisdictions can enhance protection.

Q4: Are method-of-use claims common in Eurasian pharmaceutical patents?
A: While possible, patentability of method-of-use claims depends on local laws and examination standards, often requiring inventive step demonstrations.

Q5: What are the current trends in patenting pharmaceutical innovations within Eurasia?
A: There is a focus on chemical derivatives, delivery systems, and combination therapies, often resulting in densely packed patent landscapes that require meticulous navigation.


References

  1. Eurasian Patent Office (EAPO). Official Guidelines for Examination of Pharmaceutical Patents.
  2. WIPO. Patent Landscape Report on Pharmaceuticals in Eurasia.
  3. European Patent Office. Guidance on Patent Claim Drafting.
  4. Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). International Patent Filing Strategy.
  5. Industry Reports on Pharmaceutical Patent Trends [2022–2023].

Note: This analysis is based on hypothetical assumptions about patent EA202090809, as full patent specification details were not provided. For precise legal interpretation, consult the official patent documents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.