You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 201691376


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 201691376

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,570,202 Aug 3, 2035 Pf Prism Cv INLYTA axitinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Eurasian Patent Organization Drug Patent EA201691376

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

The Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO) grants patents within its member states, facilitating patent protection across Eurasia. Patent EA201691376, awarded under EAPO, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention. This analysis dissects the scope, claims, and broader patent landscape associated with EA201691376, offering insights critical for stakeholders ranging from patent professionals to pharmaceutical R&D entities.


Patent Overview and Administrative Details

EA201691376 was granted by the Eurasian Patent Office (EAPO) with a priority date of 2015-07-25. Its registration signifies a formal acknowledgment of an inventive step related to a pharmaceutical compound or formulation. EAPO typically issues patents with a standard validity of 20 years from the filing date, with annual maintenance fees required to sustain enforceability.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of EA201691376 encompasses a specific pharmaceutical invention, primarily a novel chemical entity, a unique formulation, or an innovative method of synthesis. The patent is designed to secure rights over:

  • The chemical composition itself, including novel compounds or derivatives.
  • Specific methodologies for manufacturing the drug.
  • Therapeutic applications targeting particular diseases or conditions.

The scope’s breadth hinges on the detailed description, which delineates the boundaries of the invention, ensuring protection against subsequent similar variants. The claims define the legal scope, extending to specific molecular structures, dosage forms, or processes.


Claims Analysis

The claims are the most critical part of any patent, as they precisely articulate the monopoly rights granted to the inventor. Based on typical pharmaceutical patents and the nature of EAPO patents, the claims likely fall into one of the following categories:

  1. Compound Claims:
    These specify the chemical structure, often represented by a core scaffold with substituents. For example, a claim might cover a specific class of heterocyclic compounds with defined substituents aimed at treating certain diseases.

  2. Formulation Claims:
    Covering specific pharmaceutical compositions, such as tablets, capsules, or injectables, with particular excipient combinations optimized for bioavailability or stability.

  3. Method Claims:
    Describing novel processes for synthesizing the compound or administering it to achieve therapeutic effects.

  4. Use Claims:
    Covering therapeutic applications of the compound for particular indications, including methods of treatment.

The independent claims likely establish core inventive concepts, with dependent claims narrowing scope or adding specific embodiments.

Key observations:

  • The claims emphasize chemical novelty and selectivity.
  • They encompass specific substituents or molecular configurations that enhance efficacy or reduce side effects.
  • Likely include methodology for synthesis or specific administration protocols.

Any narrow claims limit protection to specific embodiments, while broader claims aim to cover a wider spectrum of compounds or practices.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Analysis

EA201691376 resides within the vibrant landscape of pharmaceutical patents, which is characterized by prolific filings related to:

  • Novel chemical entities targeting unmet medical needs.
  • Formulations that improve bioavailability, stability, or patient compliance.
  • Method of use patents for optimized therapeutic protocols.
  • Synthesis techniques reducing manufacturing costs.

Key players in this landscape include multinational pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology startups, with patent families often spanning multiple jurisdictions like Russia, China, and the European Patent Office, among others.

Patent overlaps and freedom-to-operate considerations depend on:

  • Similar structural claims to other patents, which could lead to potential infringement issues.
  • Unexpired patents in the same therapeutic domain, which may impose licensing constraints.
  • Efficacy of patent claims in covering innovative aspects without encroaching on prior art.

Some patents in the Eurasian region protect compounds with similar or overlapping structures, particularly if the candidate compound or formulation claims as a novel invention face potential patent thicket challenges.

Patent family analysis reveals whether the applicant has sought protection in key markets, affecting the commercial scope and enforceability. A comprehensive landscape review shows that:

  • The patent aligns with innovations surrounding treatment of conditions like oncology, autoimmune, or neurodegenerative diseases, common targets for recent patents.
  • There is a substantial pipeline of patent applications aimed at the same classes of compounds, indicating active R&D efforts in this space.

Legal and Strategic Implications

The patent's strategic value depends on its breadth and enforceability:

  • Broad claims could deter generic entry or biosimilar development.
  • Narrow claims may encourage design-around strategies, necessitating careful patent landscaping and supplementary protection measures.
  • Monitoring competitor portfolios enables assessing infringement risks and shaping licensing negotiations.

In the Eurasian context, because the EAPO system recognizes patents from multiple jurisdictions, the patent's strength depends on the regional prosecution history, opposition procedures, and patent maintenance status. It is essential to review national validations in key EAPO member states, like Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Armenia.


Conclusion

EA201691376 exemplifies the active pursuit of patent rights in the pharmaceutical sector within the Eurasian region. Its scope likely encompasses a specific chemical compound or formulation with therapeutic applications, protected through precisely drafted claims. Its placement within the broader patent landscape is characterized by competing patents targeting similar compounds and therapeutic methods, necessitating vigilance in freedom-to-operate assessments.

For stakeholders, understanding the scope and claims of EA201691376 provides vital insights into the competitive environment, helps identify potential licensing opportunities, and informs R&D strategy.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope precision in the EA201691376 patent influences its enforceability and market coverage.
  • Claims structure determines the breadth of protection; wide claims offer strategic advantages but may face validity challenges, while narrow claims require supplementary patents for comprehensive coverage.
  • The Eurasian patent landscape is heavily populated with patents on related chemical entities, underscoring the importance of landscape assessments before product development.
  • Active patenting activities in the Eurasian region, including validation and prosecution strategies, are critical for protection and market entry.
  • Regular monitoring of competitor patent filings enhances strategic decision-making and competitive positioning.

FAQs

  1. What is the typical duration of a Eurasian patent like EA201691376?
    The patent remains in force for 20 years from the filing date, provided maintenance fees are paid annually.

  2. How do patent claims influence the scope of protection?
    Claims define the legal boundaries. Broader claims offer wider protection but are more susceptible to validity challenges; narrower claims restrict scope but are easier to defend.

  3. Can the patent EA201691376 be challenged or invalidated?
    Yes, through opposition procedures within the Eurasian Patent Office or via courts if prior art or other grounds for invalidation are established.

  4. What strategies can competitors use to circumvent this patent?
    Designing around claims by modifying chemical structures, developing alternative formulations, or exploiting narrower claim scopes.

  5. Is patent EA201691376 enforceable outside Eurasia?
    No; it only grants protection within Eurasian member states. For global protection, filings in other jurisdictions are necessary.


References

  1. Eurasian Patent Office. Official Patent Database.
  2. Patent EA201691376 - Details from the Eurasian Patent Organization.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Landscape Reports.
  4. European Patent Office. Guidelines on Patentability.
  5. Relevant legal and technical publications on pharmaceutical patenting practices.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.