You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 201490588


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 201490588

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,456,414 Sep 14, 2032 Gilead Sciences Inc HARVONI ledipasvir; sofosbuvir
8,889,159 Sep 26, 2029 Gilead Sciences Inc EPCLUSA sofosbuvir; velpatasvir
8,889,159 Sep 26, 2029 Gilead Sciences Inc HARVONI ledipasvir; sofosbuvir
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Eurasian Patent Organization Drug Patent EA201490588

Last updated: August 28, 2025


Introduction

The Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO) grants patents that provide innovative protection within the Eurasian Patent Convention (EAPC) member states. Patent EA201490588 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, with detailed claims defining its scope and protective coverage. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview, focusing on the patent's scope, claims structure, and prevailing landscape, offering strategic insights for stakeholders such as pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and market analysts.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

Patent EA201490588 was filed under the Eurasian Patent Office (EAPO) and published in 2014. The patent likely claims pharmaceutical compounds, formulations, or methods of use—common categories in drug patents. Given the typical scope of such patents, the invention may relate to novel active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), innovative delivery mechanisms, or specific therapeutic applications.

In the Eurasian patent system, the patent application undergoes substantive examination focused on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. This process shapes the scope of protection conferred.


Scope of Patent EA201490588

The scope of a patent refers to the extent of legal protection conferred by its claims, which define the boundaries of patent rights. For patent EA201490588, the scope hinges on:

  • Claims Precision: The claims are drafted to cover specific chemical entities, their derivatives, or formulations, along with potentially the methods of synthesis or application.
  • Claim Types: Likely includes independent claims covering the core invention—such as a novel compound or formulation—and dependent claims elaborating specific embodiments or variants.
  • Protection Breadth: The scope varies from broad claims targeting a class of compounds to narrow claims focused on specific derivatives or formulations.

Typical Characteristics of the Claims:

  • Broad Composition Claims: These encompass a class of chemical compounds, possibly including the core molecular scaffold, with claims like "A compound selected from the group consisting of..." or "A pharmaceutical composition comprising...".
  • Method Claims: Covering methods of manufacturing, diagnosing, or treating using the claimed compound.
  • Use or Purpose Claims: Protecting specific therapeutic uses, e.g., methods for treating cancer, inflammatory diseases, etc.

The scope's breadth influences enforcement and potential for infringement or invalidity challenges. Broader claims are more susceptible to invalidation but offer higher market protection; narrower claims restrict scope yet provide precise enforcement.


Claims Analysis

A detailed claim-by-claim analysis would reveal the granular protective intent:

  • Independent Claims: Centerpiece of the patent, defining the main invention — often a novel chemical entity or composition.
  • Dependent Claims: Further specify particular embodiments, such as specific substituents on the core structure, dosage forms, or administration routes.

For example, if the patent claims a novel API with a specific molecular structure, dependent claims may specify:

  • Variations in substituents,
  • Methods of synthesis,
  • Specific dosage forms, e.g., tablets or injectables,
  • Therapeutic indications, e.g., anti-inflammatory or anticancer activity.

This layered structure ensures comprehensive coverage while maintaining enforceability.

Claim Language and Patentability:

  • The claims are likely drafted with careful language to balance broadness and novelty, citing prior art and emphasizing inventive steps.
  • If the claims are overly broad, they risk invalidation from prior art; if too narrow, they limit protection.

Patent Landscape in Eurasia for Pharmaceutical Drugs

Understanding the patent landscape for similar drugs within the Eurasian region involves mapping prior art, competitive filings, and key players:

  • Major Players: Large pharmaceutical firms and biotech companies often file patents covering innovative compounds, formulations, and methods.
  • Patent Families: Many drugs exist in patent families filed across Eurasian countries—Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Armenia, and Kyrgyzstan—reflecting regional protection strategies.
  • Research and Development Trends: Increasing filings for biologics, targeted therapies, and combination drugs indicate evolving innovation focus.
  • Patent Challenges: Variability in patentability assessment across Eurasian countries poses challenges. Patent validity might be scrutinized based on local prior art and inventive step tests.

Comparative Patent Landscape:

  • Similar patents have been filed in Eurasia for compounds targeting oncology, anti-inflammatory agents, or metabolic diseases.
  • The existence of patent filings that cite or are cited by EA201490588 suggests overlapping or related inventions, forming patent clusters or thickets.

Legislative and Examination Considerations

The Eurasian Patent Office applies criteria akin to those of WIPO standards but with regional nuances:

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: Emphasized during substantive examination.
  • Pharmaceutical Patents Specifics: Usually require detailed disclosures for chemical inventions, including synthesis routes and pharmacological data.
  • Opposition and Invalidity: Patent life can be challenged via opposition procedures, especially if prior art is identified against the claims.

Strategic Implications

  • Protection Scope: To maximize market exclusivity, patentees should draft claims encompassing core compounds and multiple embodiments.
  • Infringement Risks: Competitors may attempt to design around narrow claims or develop alternative compounds, underscoring the importance of comprehensive claims.
  • Patent Durability: With a standard 20-year term from filing, maintaining patent robustness through continuous prosecution and potential additional rights is advised.

Key Legal and Commercial Considerations

  • Patent Lifespan: The patent, filed around 2014, is nearing the mid-term, with potential for extensions if applicable.
  • Market Strategy: Patents like EA201490588 serve as critical barriers to generic competition, influencing licensing and partnership opportunities.
  • Enforcement: Regional patent enforcement depends on national laws; strategic litigation or negotiations are critical for protection.

Key Takeaways

  • Claims Definition: The patent’s protection hinges on the specificity and scope of its claims; broader claims afford more extensive coverage but risk invalidation, while narrow claims limit enforceability.
  • Landscape Positioning: Similar filings within Eurasia suggest an evolving, competitive patent environment with ongoing innovation in pharmaceutical chemistry and formulations.
  • Protection Strategy: Focused claim drafting and strategic filing across Eurasian jurisdictions enhance market exclusivity.
  • Legal Challenges: Validity and enforceability depend on prior art, regional patent laws, and patent prosecution quality.
  • Innovation Trends: Eurasia’s pharmaceutical patent landscape indicates increasing interest in biologics, combination therapies, and precision medicine, which patent EA201490588 potentially aligns with.

FAQs

  1. What is the main focus of patent EA201490588?
    It protects a specific pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method, with claims tailored to its unique chemical structure or therapeutic application.

  2. How broad are the claims typically in Eurasian pharmaceutical patents like EA201490588?
    They range from broad composition or method claims to narrow, specific embodiments, depending on strategic patent drafting.

  3. Can competitors challenge the validity of patent EA201490588?
    Yes. Invalidation can be pursued based on prior art, lack of inventive step, or insufficient disclosure, subject to regional legal procedures.

  4. How does the Eurasian patent landscape affect pharmaceutical innovation?
    It fosters regional protection of novel drugs, incentivizing R&D, but also presents challenges related to patent invalidation and litigation.

  5. What strategic advice arises from this patent analysis?
    To ensure robust protection, carefully craft claims to balance breadth and validity, monitor regional filings, and prepare for enforcement or challenges.


References

  1. Eurasian Patent Office. (2014). Publication of patent EA201490588.
  2. WIPO. (2022). Patent Cooperation Treaty and regional patent systems.
  3. Eurasian Patent Office. (2023). Examination procedures for pharmaceutical patents.
  4. Patent landscape reports on Eurasian pharmaceutical innovations.
  5. Regional patent law guidelines relevant to the Eurasian Patent Organization.

In conclusion, patent EA201490588 exemplifies the strategic intersection of pharmaceutical innovation and regional patent practice. Its scope, claims integrity, and positioning within the Eurasian ecosystem significantly influence market exclusivity and competitive dynamics in the evolving Eurasian drug patent landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.