You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 201201451


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 201201451

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 11, 2030 Phathom VOQUEZNA TRIPLE PAK amoxicillin; clarithromycin; vonoprazan fumarate
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 11, 2030 Phathom VOQUEZNA DUAL PAK amoxicillin; vonoprazan fumarate
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 11, 2030 Phathom VOQUEZNA vonoprazan fumarate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Eurasian Patent Organization Drug Patent EA201201451

Last updated: August 17, 2025

Introduction

The Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO) patent EA201201451 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, which is fundamental to understanding its scope, claims, and position within the broader patent landscape. This review analyses the patent's claims and scope, examines the related patent environment, and discusses strategic considerations for stakeholders engaging with this patent.

Patent Overview and Filing Context

The Eurasian patent EA201201451 was filed and granted within EAPO, serving as an essential legal instrument for protecting pharmaceutical innovations across Eurasian countries, including Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Armenia, and Kyrgyzstan. The patent’s filing date and priority status set the foundation for subsequent legal and commercial activities.

According to available information, the patent appears aimed at protecting a specific drug formulation, method of production, or therapeutic use. Its issuance underscores the applicant’s intent to secure exclusive rights over a novel medicinal invention in a rapidly expanding Eurasian pharmaceutical market.

Scope of the Patent and Claims Analysis

Claims Overview

Patent claims define the legal boundaries of protection and are pivotal in assessing patent strength, enforceability, and potential for infringement or licensing. EA201201451’s claims likely encompass:

  • Independent Claims: Broad claims that articulate the core inventive concept, potentially covering a specific pharmaceutical compound, combination, or method of use.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims referencing independent claims, possibly detailing specific dosages, formulations, or manufacturing steps.

Typical claim structures in pharmaceutical patents include:

  • Compound claims: Covering novel chemical entities or derivatives.
  • Method claims: Covering processes for preparing the drug or administering it.
  • Use claims: Covering specific therapeutic applications or treatment methods.

Given the typical nature of drug patents, EA201201451 probably emphasizes a novel compound or combination with specific therapeutic advantages.

Scope Analysis

The scope hinges on claim wording:

  • Broad Claims: If the patent claims encompass generic forms of the active ingredient or broad therapeutic indications, it offers extensive protection but may face challenges regarding inventive step or clarity.
  • Narrow Claims: Precise formulation details or specific indications limit scope but enhance defensibility.

Analyzing the patent’s scope involves:

  • Inventive contribution: Whether the claims extend significantly beyond prior art, such as prior patents, scientific publications, or known formulations.
  • Claim dependency: How dependent claims narrow the scope, targeting specific embodiments.
  • Functional language: Whether claims focus on structural features, methods, or compositions, affecting enforceability.

Potential Claim Challenges

Pharmaceutical patents often face challenge based on prior art, especially with the scientific proliferation of similar compounds:

  • Obviousness: Narrow claims might be vulnerable if the invention appears obvious in view of prior art.
  • Lack of novelty: Broad claims could be invalid if similar compounds or methods are documented previously.
  • Clarity and support: The claims must be fully supported by the description and be clear to avoid invalidity or narrow interpretation.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Position within Eurasian and Global Context

The EA201201451 patent exists within a competitive landscape involving filings in other jurisdictions—such as the European Patent Office (EPO), United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and China. Key considerations include:

  • Patent family and territorial coverage: Whether equivalent patents exist in major markets, affecting monopoly scope.
  • Patent life and lifecycle management: Monitoring renewal statuses and potential for extensions or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) (noting that SPCs are primarily a European mechanism).
  • Freedom to operate: Overlap with existing patents, especially in generic drug markets, could influence commercialization strategies.

Prior Art and Related Patents

The landscape assessment necessitates analysis of related patents and publications. Prior art searches indicate whether:

  • The compound or similar formulations were disclosed earlier.
  • The therapeutic application was known, affecting patent novelty.
  • Similar claims exist, which could lead to patent overlap or infringement risks.

Legal and Patentability Considerations

In EAPO jurisdictions, patentability is determined based on statutory criteria: novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The patent’s validity depends on how well the claims distinguish over the prior art, and whether the description enables skilled persons to reproduce the invention.

Competitive and Strategic Implications

Owners of EA201201451 may face patent challenges from competitors, generic manufacturers, or third-party patent oppositions. Conversely, defensible claims with broad scope confer significant market exclusivity, which is crucial for recouping investments in drug development.

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical companies must evaluate the patent’s claims relative to their pipelines to avoid infringement.
  • Generic manufacturers need to scrutinize the scope for potential patent invalidation or design-around strategies.
  • Investors and licensing entities should consider patent strength and coverage in valuation models.

Conclusion

The Eurasian Patent EA201201451 demonstrates a targeted approach to protecting a pharmaceutical invention, with claims likely centered on specific compounds, formulations, or therapeutic methods. Its scope depends heavily on claim drafting precision and prior art landscape. To maximize commercial value, patent owners should continuously monitor legal developments, possible patent challenges, and patent family counterparts across jurisdictions.


Key Takeaways

  • The strength of EA201201451 hinges on precise claim drafting, emphasizing novelty and inventive step over prior art.
  • Broad claims offer extensive protection but may invite validity challenges; narrow claims provide defensibility but limit exclusivity.
  • A comprehensive patent landscape review across Eurasia and internationally helps assess risks of infringement and opportunities for licensing.
  • Strategic patent portfolio management involves monitoring patent lapses, oppositions, and potential for extension or supplementary protections.
  • Stakeholders must evaluate the patent’s claims and scope carefully to make informed decisions regarding R&D strategies, licensing, and market entry.

FAQs

1. What are the primary considerations when evaluating the scope of a pharmaceutical patent like EA201201451?
The primary considerations include the breadth of claims, the specific chemical compounds or methods covered, and how these claims differentiate from prior art, ensuring enforceability and freedom to operate.

2. How does the claim structure influence patent strength?
Independent claims establish the broadest protection, while dependent claims add specificity, aiding in defending the patent against validity challenges. Well-drafted claims balance broad coverage with clear support in the description.

3. Can a Eurasian patent like EA201201451 be enforced across all member countries equally?
While the Eurasian patent provides uniform rights within member states, enforcement depends on national courts, and variations in legal standards can affect enforcement efficacy.

4. What role does prior art play in assessing the validity of EA201201451?
Prior art determines novelty and inventive step. If earlier disclosures or patents overlap significantly with the claims, the patent’s validity could be compromised.

5. How can stakeholders protect their interests regarding patents like EA201201451?
Regular monitoring of patent statuses, conducting freedom-to-operate analyses, and securing a strong patent family portfolio are essential strategies for stakeholders to safeguard their rights and market position.


References

  1. Eurasian Patent Organization. Official Patent Database. [Accessed YYYY].
  2. WIPO. Patent Search and Analysis Tools. [Accessed YYYY].
  3. European Patent Office. Patent Drafting and Claim Strategy. [Accessed YYYY].
  4. USPTO. Pharmaceutical patent landscape reports. [Accessed YYYY].
  5. Scientific Publications related to the drug’s active compounds and formulations.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.