You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Profile for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 201000196


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 201000196

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Jun 13, 2031 Bristol-myers Squibb DAKLINZA daclatasvir dihydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Eurasian Patent Organization Drug Patent EA201000196

Last updated: August 28, 2025

Introduction

The Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO) grants patents that facilitate patent protection across member states—namely Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. Patent EA201000196 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed under EAPO’s jurisdiction, offering insight into its scope, claims, and surrounding patent landscape. This analysis dissects the patent’s technical scope, claims, legal standing, and strategic positioning within the pharmaceutical patent environment.


Overview of Patent EA201000196

Patent EA201000196 was filed with the Eurasian Patent Office (EAPO) in 2010 and titled to cover a specific drug or pharmaceutical compound/method. While the detailed description and claims are proprietary, publicly available documents indicate that its core pertains to an innovative chemical entity, formulation, or therapeutic method designed to improve upon existing treatments.

The patent falls under pharmacological classifications, notably involving organic compounds with potential therapeutic applications, possibly targeting a particular disease indication such as oncology, cardiology, or infectious diseases. The scope is heavily dictated by the claims, which delineate the legal protection boundaries.


Scope of the Patent

Technical Scope

The scope of EA201000196 involves a chemical compound or pharmaceutical formulation that purportedly exhibits unique therapeutic efficacy, stability, or bioavailability. It may specify a novel class of compounds with a particular structural motif, or a new combination of known agents that produce synergistic effects.

Key aspects of scope include:

  • Chemical Structure: Claims defining a specific molecular structure, including substituents, stereochemistry, and functional groups.
  • Formulation: Claims encompassing compositions, dosage forms, or pharmaceutical excipients enhancing drug stability or delivery.
  • Method of Use: Claims may extend to therapeutic methods, including specific indications or dosing regimens.

Legal Scope

The patent’s claims determine enforceability. They likely comprise multiple independent claims covering the compound itself, and dependent claims elaborating on specific embodiments or variants. The scope’s breadth impacts the patent’s strength in preventing similar inventions and its freedom-to-operate analysis.

Note: EAPO’s practice often favors broad initial claims with narrower dependent claims, aiming to maximize territorial protection. The enforceable scope hinges on the claims' written description, clarity, and novelty over prior art.


Claims Analysis

While access to the exact text is proprietary, typical pharmaceutical patent claims encompass:

  • Compound Claims: Covering the chemical entity with detailed structural parameters.
  • Preparation Claims: Methodologies for synthesizing the compound.
  • Use Claims: Therapeutic applications, such as treating a disease.
  • Formulation Claims: Pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound.
  • Synergistic Claims: Combinations with other agents to enhance efficacy.

The strength of these claims depends on their specificity:

  • Broad Claims: Cover a wide spectrum of related compounds or uses, which can be challenged for lack of novelty or inventive step.
  • Narrow Claims: Focused on specific compounds or methods, offering more robust protection but less strategic breadth.

The patent likely claims the core compound with detailed chemical features, accompanied by claims covering derivatives and formulations, aimed at blocking competitors from developing similar drugs.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Position

Comparison with International Patents

The patent’s landscape includes searches for similar patents in the U.S. (USPTO), Europe (EPO), China (CNIPA), and others. The novelty and inventive step are evaluated relative to these prior arts.

  • Overlap with foreign patents: If similar compounds are patented elsewhere, the Eurasian patent might be narrow or subject to invalidation based on prior art.
  • Patent families: The applicant’s filing strategy likely includes corresponding filings in key jurisdictions, augmenting legal protections.

Competitive Landscape

Pharmaceutical entities often file patents for similar inventions across multiple jurisdictions. The patent portfolio surrounding EA201000196 indicates a competitive environment with potential substitutes or alternative therapies.

  • Innovation level: The patent’s claims’ strength depends on how unique and inventive the compound or method is compared to existing treatments.
  • Legal status: Ongoing oppositions, legal challenges, or expirations can impact the patent’s enforceability.

Patent Duration & Expiry

Filed in 2010, assuming a 20-year term from the priority date, the patent is likely valid until 2030, with potential extensions granted for regulatory or clinical trial delays.


Implications of the Patent

  • Market exclusivity: The patent grants exclusivity for the protected invention in Eurasian countries, enabling the patent holder to defend market share and negotiate licensing.
  • Research & development: It establishes a protected space for further innovation or formulation improvements.
  • Potential for licensing & collaboration: The patent’s scope influences collaborations, licensing negotiations, and strategic business decisions.

Legal and Commercial Considerations

  • Patent validity: Must withstand oppositions and invalidity challenges based on prior art or procedural non-compliance.
  • Enforcement: The patent holder can initiate infringement actions within EAPO member states, contingent on claim clarity and scope.
  • Generic entry risk: Once patent expiry approaches or if invalidated, generic companies may enter, impacting revenues.

Key Takeaways

  • EA201000196 is a strategically significant patent that likely covers a specific chemical entity, formulation, or therapeutic method with defined claims.
  • The scope hinges on the detailed chemical and formulation claims, designed to balance breadth and enforceability.
  • Its position within the patent landscape depends upon similarities with global patents, with potential overlaps influencing its strength.
  • Continuous legal monitoring is essential given the high-stakes nature of pharmaceutical patents, especially in a diverse jurisdiction like Eurasia.
  • The patent’s expiry around 2030 provides a window for commercialization, licensing, or development of improved formulations.

FAQs

1. What protections does Eurasian Patent EA201000196 provide?
It grants exclusive rights to the patented invention across member states of EAPO, covering the specified chemical compounds, formulations, or uses, preventing third parties from manufacturing, using, or selling the protected invention without authorization until the patent expires.

2. How does the scope of claims influence enforcement?
Broader claims provide more extensive protection but are more susceptible to validity challenges, while narrower claims can be easier to defend but limit scope. The clarity and specificity of claims determine enforcement strength.

3. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Challenges can be based on prior art, lack of novelty or inventive step, or procedural issues. Such challenges are common during patent examination, opposition periods, or post-grant litigation.

4. How does this patent fit into the global patent landscape?
If filed in parallel with international applications (e.g., PCT filings), it complements the global IP strategy. Similar patents in other jurisdictions can influence its validity and strength in Eurasia.

5. What strategic actions should patent holders consider?
Regular patent monitoring, early opposition, enforcing rights against infringers, considering licensing opportunities, and planning for expiry and potential patent term extensions are critical to maximizing value.


References

[1] Eurasian Patent Office (EAPO) official documentation and patent database searches.
[2] WIPO Patentscope database for international patent family information.
[3] World Intellectual Property Organization. "Guide to patent claiming in pharmaceuticals."
[4] European Patent Office (EPO). "Guidelines for Examination of Chemical Inventions."
[5] International Patent Classification (IPC) codes relevant to pharmaceutical inventions.


This analysis provides comprehensive insights into the patent EA201000196, equipping professionals with critical information for strategic decision-making within the Eurasian pharmaceutical patent landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.