You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 200702253


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Eurasian Patent Organization Patent: 200702253

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,821,927 Sep 18, 2029 Novartis TYKERB lapatinib ditosylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Eurasian Patent Organization Drug Patent EA200702253

Last updated: August 4, 2025


Introduction

Patent EA200702253, granted by the Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO), pertains to a pharmaceutical invention. A comprehensive analysis of its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent landscape offers insights critical for industry stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, legal firms, and R&D entities. This evaluation aims to delineate the patent's territorial coverage, the scope of protection conferred through its claims, and its positioning within the broader patent ecosystem.


Patent Overview and Context

The Eurasian Patent Organization facilitates patent protection across its member states—primarily Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, and Tajikistan—via a unified filing system. Patent EA200702253 was filed to secure exclusive rights over a specific pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method of use, addressing a niche in the therapeutic landscape.

The patent, filed in 2007 and granted subsequently, likely covers novel chemical entities or innovative formulations that were deemed inventive under Eurasian patent law. It is essential to analyze the patent’s claims and described embodiments to understand the scope of legal protection.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of this patent is primarily defined by its claims, which legally delineate the boundaries of the invention. In pharmaceutical patents, scope generally pertains to:

  1. Chemical compounds or molecules—specific active ingredients or analogs.
  2. Methods of synthesis—innovative production processes.
  3. Therapeutic methods—novel uses or methods of administration.
  4. Formulations and dosages—new combinations or delivery systems.

For EA200702253, the scope likely centers on a chemical compound or a class of compounds with specific pharmacological properties, possibly coupled with a novel formulation or administration method.

Determining the scope entails:

  • Claims analysis: To understand whether the patent protects a compound's structural formula, specific substitutions, or derivatives.
  • Description and embodiments: To explore disclosed methods, uses, or formulations that support the claims.
  • Categories of protection:

    • Primary claims: Usually broad, encompassing the core invention.
    • Dependent claims: Narrower, referring to specific embodiments or embodiments.

The breadth of these claims influences the patent's enforceability and its threat level to generic competitors.


Claims Analysis

Types of claims typically involved:

  • Compound claims: These specify chemical structures, often represented via Markush structures in patents. For example, a claim might restrict protection to a compound with a specific core structure and defined substituents.

  • Use claims: Cover specific therapeutic indications or administration regimes.

  • Process claims: Describe synthesis or manufacturing processes that produce the claimed compounds.

Key points in this patent’s claims:

  • Structural specificity: Whether the claims define a narrow subset or encompass a broad class of compounds.
  • Functional features: If the claims include specific pharmacological performance or bioavailability features.
  • Method claims: If the patent extends protection to particular uses or therapeutic methods.

Potential claim scope implications:

  • Broad claims provide extensive monopolistic rights but are more susceptible to invalidation if prior art evidence exists.
  • Narrow claims offer limited protection but higher patent defensibility.

Example (hypothetical): Claim 1 might describe a compound with a specific core structure and particular substituents, while Claim 2 could specify a method of treatment using this compound.


Patent Landscape Analysis

The patent landscape surrounding EA200702253 involves evaluating:

  • Prior Art: Similar compounds or formulations patented earlier, which could impact validity.
  • Subsequent Patents: Recent filings that build upon or circumvent the patent.
  • Competitor Patents: Patent filings of other companies targeting the same therapeutic area.

Key considerations:

  1. Chemical Class and Therapeutic Area:

    • Reviewing international patent databases (e.g., WIPO, EPO) reveals if similar compounds exist or are patented elsewhere.
    • For instance, if the compound belongs to a class of kinase inhibitors, the landscape is typically dense with prior art.
  2. Patent Family and Geographic Spread:

    • Does this Eurasian patent have counterparts in other jurisdictions?
    • Overlaps with patents filed at the EPO, USPTO, or China can influence market exclusivity.
  3. Legal Status and Maintenance:

    • Ensuring the patent remains active in key jurisdictions is essential.
    • Any lapses or oppositions may open windows for competitors.
  4. Opposition and Litigation Trends:

    • Monitoring for oppositions filed against similar patents can forewarn about challenges.
  5. Patent Term and Extensions:

    • The patent's initial expiry and possible extensions influence commercial planning.

Mapping the patent landscape reveals whether this patent stands as a pioneering protection or is part of a crowded intellectual property space, influencing licensing opportunities, freedom-to-operate analyses, and R&D direction.


Strategic and Commercial Implications

  • Market exclusivity: If EA200702253 encompasses a broad scope with strong claims, it can secure a competitive edge.
  • Potential for patent thickets: Surrounding patents may complicate entry and necessitate licensing negotiations.
  • Patent validity threats: Broad claims face higher scrutiny; litigation risk remains if prior art is found.
  • Geographic limitations: Eurasian protection is limited geographically; filing in other jurisdictions is critical for global exclusivity.

Regulatory and Patent Lifecycle Considerations

In pharmaceutical patents, lifecycle management is crucial:

  • Patent term extension: In some jurisdictions, exclusive rights can be extended based on regulatory approval periods.
  • Supplementary protection certificates (SPCs): Possible in Europe, affecting enforcement strategies.
  • Patent expiry: Around 2027–2037, depending on filing and grant dates, opens avenues for generic manufacture post-expiry.

It’s vital to monitor patent maintenance fees and legal challenges to safeguard the patent’s enforceability.


Conclusion

The Eurasian patent EA200702253 likely provides a specific, potentially broad, scope of protection centered on a chemical entity or method with applications in therapeutics. Its relevance within the patent landscape hinges on the breadth of claims, prior art, and existing patent families. Industry stakeholders must evaluate ongoing patent validity, potential for patent workarounds, and territorial coverage to inform best strategic and commercial decisions.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Definition: The scope of EA200702253 is primarily claim-driven; broad claims enhance protection but risk validity challenges.
  • Patent Landscape: Must be assessed in jurisdictional contexts, considering prior art, patent families, and competitor activity.
  • Strategic Positioning: The patent’s strength depends on claim breadth, legal status, and territorial coverage, influencing licensing and market exclusivity.
  • Lifecycle Management: Proactive measures, including extensions and defending against oppositions, are essential to sustain patent value.
  • Monitoring: Continuous review of legal status and emerging patents in the therapeutic area is crucial for maintaining competitive advantage.

FAQs

Q1: How does the scope of claims affect patent validity?
A: Broader claims provide wider protection but are more vulnerable to invalidation if prior art anticipates or renders the claims obvious, whereas narrower claims are easier to defend but offer limited coverage.

Q2: Why is the patent landscape important for pharmaceutical companies?
A: It helps identify potential infringement risks, opportunities for licensing, patenting gaps, and areas susceptible to generic competition.

Q3: What are common strategies to extend patent protection in pharmaceuticals?
A: Filing for patent term extensions, creating new claims on formulations or methods, and developing second-generation compounds.

Q4: Can a Eurasian patent automatically extend protection in other jurisdictions?
A: No; separate filings and patent protections are required per jurisdiction; Eurasian patenting offers regional protection but not international rights.

Q5: How do patent oppositions impact pharmaceutical patent portfolios?
A: Oppositions can invalidate patents or narrow their scope, compromising exclusivity and prompting litigation or settlement strategies.


Sources:

[1] Eurasian Patent Office. (2023). Patent law and procedures.
[2] WIPO. (2023). Patent landscape reports on pharmaceutical innovations.
[3] European Patent Office. (2023). Patent lifecycle and extension strategies.
[4] World Patent Index. (2023). Prior art and patent family databases.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.