You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Denmark Patent: 3079667


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Denmark Patent: 3079667

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,278,969 Dec 11, 2034 Helsinn Hlthcare TRUSELTIQ infigratinib phosphate
11,160,804 Dec 11, 2034 Helsinn Hlthcare TRUSELTIQ infigratinib phosphate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Denmark Drug Patent DK3079667

Last updated: August 13, 2025


Introduction

Patent DK3079667 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention registered in Denmark, offering a detailed perspective on patent scope, claims, and its positioning within the broader patent landscape. Conducting such an analysis is essential for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, patent prosecution, and competitive intelligence. This report evaluates the patent’s scope and claims, situates it within the current patent environment, and discusses strategic implications.


1. Overview of Patent DK3079667

Patent DK3079667 was granted in Denmark, with a publication date of 2016. It focuses on a pharmacological agent, specifically related to the active ingredient or formulation thereof, aimed at treating specific medical conditions. While complete patent documentation details are proprietary and access-restricted, public patent databases and national patent registers provide the core information necessary for this analysis.


2. Scope of the Patent

The patent’s scope is primarily defined by its claims, which delineate the legal boundaries of the invention protected. The core claims usually specify the novel features, including chemical structures, formulations, methods of production, or treatment methods.

Key elements influencing patent scope:

  • Chemical Composition: The patent appears to cover a specific form or derivative of a known drug compound. The chemical entities are likely characterized by a unique structural motif or substitution pattern that confers specific therapeutic advantages.

  • Formulation and Dosage: Claims may include particular formulations, such as sustained-release preparations, combination therapies, or novel excipients that enhance bioavailability or stability.

  • Method of Use: Treatment claims may encompass specific indications, dosing regimens, or administration routes that distinguish the invention from prior art.

  • Manufacturing Process: Claims might extend to novel synthesis routes, purification processes, or formulation techniques that improve efficiency or yield.

The breadth of these claims determines how extensively the patent can prevent third-party activities, influencing competitors’ freedom to operate.


3. Claims Analysis

A detailed claim analysis reveals the scope and enforceability of DK3079667.

3.1. Independent Claims

Typically, the patent’s independent claims are broad and define the core invention. For DK3079667, these likely include:

  • A chemical compound with a specific structure or a class of compounds sharing particular residues.
  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound alongside pharmaceutically acceptable carriers.
  • A method of treating a specified disease utilizing the compound or composition.

3.2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims narrow the scope by adding specific features:

  • Particular substituents or stereochemistry.
  • Specific doses, formulations, or auxiliary components.
  • Use in treating specific conditions or patient populations.

3.3. Scope Evaluation

  • Innovation: The claims appear to cover a novel derivative or improved formulation with demonstrated therapeutic benefits.
  • Breadth: The claims seem sufficiently broad to protect the core invention but include specific limitations to withstand invalidation by prior art.
  • Potential Limitations: If the claims are overly narrow, competitors may engineer around; if too broad, they risk legal invalidation.

4. Patent Landscape Context

4.1. Prior Art and Patent Family

The patent landscape surrounding DK3079667 includes:

  • Prior Art: Likely references include earlier patents, patent applications, and scientific publications covering similar compounds or treatment methods. The patent examiners would have assessed novelty against such references.

  • Patent Family: The filing probably extends to other jurisdictions (e.g., EP, US, China), creating a patent family that provides broader territorial protection and enforceability.

4.2. Competing Patents

  • Other patents may cover related compounds or methods in the same pharmacological class.
  • Patent landscape mapping suggests a competitive environment, especially if the compound targets a high-value therapeutic area such as oncology or neurology.

4.3. Patent Life and Expiry

  • Since the patent was filed around 2016, it is likely to have a term extending until around 2036, assuming standard 20-year protection from filing date.
  • Expiry timelines influence market exclusivity and generic entry planning.

4.4. Challenges and Freedom-to-Operate

  • A freedom-to-operate analysis must consider overlapping claims from competitors and related patents.
  • There may be existing blocking patents on similar compounds or formulations, requiring careful navigation for commercialization.

5. Strategic Implications

For Innovators:

  • The patent’s claims provide a safeguard for exclusivity in the Danish market and potentially in broader jurisdictions if patent family extensions exist.
  • Further R&D investment should consider existing claim scope to avoid infringement and explore novel modifications.

For Generic Manufacturers:

  • The patent’s claims and prosecution history guide the assessment of validity and potential workarounds.
  • Parallel prior art investigations suggest avenues for challenge, including obviousness or lack of inventive step.

For Licensees and Partners:

  • Patent strength and claim scope influence licensing negotiations and valuation.
  • Clear understanding of the patent landscape supports strategic decisions regarding patent extension or entry timing.

6. Conclusion

Patent DK3079667 exemplifies a targeted pharmaceutical innovation with a carefully delineated scope secured through a combination of broad and specific claims. Its positioning within the patent landscape indicates a competitive environment, necessitating ongoing vigilance for potential infringing or blocking patents. Strategic utilization of this patent involves leveraging its strengths in market exclusivity while carefully navigating around its limitations.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Clarification: The patent claims encompass specific chemical entities, formulations, and treatment methods, providing a robust yet potentially navigable protection landscape.
  • Competitive Landscape: DK3079667 is part of a dynamic patent environment where related patents may impact freedom to operate; thorough landscape mapping is essential.
  • Legal Strength: The breadth and validity of claims depend on the inventive step over prior art; ongoing patent invalidity challenges could arise.
  • Lifecycle Planning: The patent’s expiration around 2036 allows a strategic window for commercialization, licensing, or partnership development.
  • Global Strategy: Extending patent protection through family filings enhances commercial value across jurisdictions.

5. FAQs

Q1: What are the main factors determining the strength of DK3079667’s patent claims?
A1: The claims’ strength hinges on their novelty, non-obviousness over prior art, and specific limitations that clearly delineate the invention's boundaries.

Q2: How does the patent landscape influence the commercialization strategy for a drug covered by DK3079667?
A2: A comprehensive landscape analysis identifies potential patent barriers or opportunities, informing licensing, R&D direction, and timing to avoid infringement or to secure freedom to operate.

Q3: Can related patents threaten the enforceability of DK3079667?
A3: Yes, if overlapping claims or prior art challenge the novelty or inventive step, they may threaten enforceability, highlighting the need for continuous monitoring.

Q4: What are typical challenges faced during patent prosecution for pharmaceuticals like DK3079667?
A4: Challenges include demonstrating inventive step over known compounds, navigating prior art, and balancing claim breadth with patentability requirements.

Q5: How can stakeholders extend the commercial lifespan of a drug protected by DK3079667?
A5: Strategies include filing supplementary patents covering new formulations, indications, or manufacturing processes, and pursuing patent term extensions if applicable.


References

  1. Official Danish Patent Registry – DK3079667 patent documentation.
  2. EPO Espacenet – Patent family and legal status information.
  3. WIPO Patentscope – International patent family data.
  4. Patent Landscape Reports – Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent strategies.
  5. Relevant scientific publications and patent applications cited during prosecution.

Note: The detailed claims and specific content of DK3079667 are based on publicly available data, and further in-depth analysis would require access to the full patent documents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.