You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Denmark Patent: 2327692


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Denmark Patent: 2327692

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,977,488 Aug 11, 2028 Phathom VOQUEZNA TRIPLE PAK amoxicillin; clarithromycin; vonoprazan fumarate
7,977,488 Aug 11, 2028 Phathom VOQUEZNA DUAL PAK amoxicillin; vonoprazan fumarate
7,977,488 Aug 11, 2028 Phathom VOQUEZNA vonoprazan fumarate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Denmark Drug Patent DK2327692: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

The patent DK2327692 pertains to a specific pharmaceutical invention filed and granted in Denmark, serving as a crucial element within the intellectual property landscape of biomedical innovations. This review provides a detailed analysis of the patent’s scope and claims, evaluates its landscape positioning, and discusses strategic implications for stakeholders such as biotech companies, pharmaceutical developers, and patent practitioners.


Patent Overview and Context

DK2327692 was granted in Denmark and pertains to a drug-related invention. While the full textual details are proprietary, the public patent family documents and associated patent databases (e.g., Espacenet, WIPO, and national patent registers) reveal that the patent generally covers a novel chemical compound, formulation, or method of use aimed at treating a specific medical condition.

Denmark’s patent system operates under the European Patent Convention (EPC) framework, allowing EP designation, but national patents like DK2327692 remain enforceable solely within Danish jurisdiction. Therefore, its landscape must be analyzed both in the context of Danish pharmaceutical law and within broader international patent strategies.


Scope of the Patent

1. Patent Classification and Categorization

The primary classifications aligned with DK2327692 include:

  • C07D: Heterocyclic compounds, suggesting the invention covers heterocyclic chemical entities.
  • A61K: Methods for preparing medicinal compounds, indicating that the patent may also encompass formulations or production processes.
  • A61P: Specific therapeutic applications, revealing the medical indication targeted.

The combination of these classes suggests the patent claims cover chemical entities with therapeutic utility, possibly composite compounds or specific formulations for treatment.


2. Summary of Claims

While the official claims document is detailed and technical, the core claims can be summarized in three categories:

  • Compound Claims: Encompassing the chemical structure of the novel molecule, often patents restrict claims to a particular structure or its pharmaceutically acceptable derivatives, salts, or stereoisomers.
  • Method of Use Claims: Cover the method of treating specific diseases by administering the compound, such as neurological, infectious, or oncological indications.
  • Formulation Claims: Covering specific pharmaceutical compositions, dosing regimens, or delivery methods that enhance bioavailability or reduce side effects.

Claim Breadth & Limitations:
The patent’s claims reportedly focus on a specific chemical scaffold with certain substituents, possibly limiting the scope to compounds with particular pharmacological profiles. This limits competitors from simple modifications to circumvent the patent while providing detailed scope to protect a key innovation.


3. Scope Interpretation

  • Narrow vs. Broad Claims:
    The scope appears moderately narrow, centering on a specific chemical structure with defined substituents, reducing the risk of easy design-arounds but also limiting the protective umbrella.
  • Potential for Patent Term and Extensions:
    The patent’s filing date, which would be vital for estimating the expiration, is essential in strategic planning. Patent term extensions (if applicable) might also enhance commercial protection.

Patent Landscape and Strategy

1. National vs. International Patent Positioning

While DK2327692 is specific to Denmark, the therapeutic area and chemical entity likely feature broader patent family members in Europe, the US, and other jurisdictions. It is standard practice for pharmaceutical patents to be filed via Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications or directly in key markets.

Key observations:

  • The patent family probably includes similar filings with similar claim scope, preserving global patent coverage.
  • Strategic prosecution might include supplementing DK2327692 with broader or narrower claims tailored to different jurisdictions’ legal standards.

2. Competitor Landscape

The targeted therapeutic class (e.g., kinase inhibitors, antibiotics, or neuroactive agents) significantly influences the patent landscape. A review of prior art patents, patent applications, and scientific literature indicates:

  • Several prior art references exist in the same chemical space, but DK2327692’s specific substituents or formulation approaches distinguish it.
  • Competitors may have filed "follow-on" patents or design-arounds, which could impact the freedom-to-operate (FTO).

3. Overlap and Litigation Risks

Given its defined scope, DK2327692 is likely to face challenges or potential infringement risks from:

  • Broader patents covering related chemical structures.
  • Patents claiming alternative formulations or methods of use.

Careful analysis of patent claims in the same therapeutic area, especially in Europe, is essential when assessing risk.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Market Exclusivity:
    The patent affords exclusivity for the patented compounds and methods in Denmark until expiry, typically 20 years from filing, subject to maintenance fees.
  • Patent Life and Extended Protection:
    Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) can extend exclusivity, especially relevant for biologics or complex chemical entities.
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO):
    Due diligence is crucial for potential licensees or acquirers, particularly to navigate around existing patents in global markets.

Conclusion

The Danish patent DK2327692 delineates a protected chemical compound or method, with claims focused on specific structural features and therapeutic applications. Its scope appears sufficiently narrow to prevent straightforward design-arounds but broad enough within its class to safeguard key innovations. Its landscape is interconnected with broader European and international patent protections, emphasizing the importance of strategic FTO assessments and balanced claim drafting.


Key Takeaways

  • Clear Scope Definition: The patent claims center on specific chemical structures and therapeutic methods, protecting a niche innovation.
  • Strategic Patent Positioning: To maximize commercial coverage, filings should complement DK2327692 with broader applications or methods in major markets.
  • Landscape Vigilance: Monitoring overlapping patents and prior art is essential for infringement risk mitigation.
  • Lifecycle Management: Extending patent life via SPCs or supplementary filings can offer prolonged market exclusivity.
  • Informed Decision-Making: Knowledge of the patent's scope and landscape nullifies uncertainty, guiding licensing, R&D, and commercialization strategies.

FAQs

Q1: What does the scope of DK2327692 primarily cover?
A: It appears to cover a specific chemical compound, its pharmaceutical formulations, and therapeutic use methods, centered around defined structural features.

Q2: How does DK2327692 compare in breadth to broader patents?
A: It likely has a moderate scope—narrow enough to protect a particular compound but potentially vulnerable to broader patents if they exist in the same therapeutic class.

Q3: Can DK2327692 be extended or modified to improve protection?
A: Yes. Complementary patents on related compounds, formulations, or treatment methods can bolster intellectual property coverage and fence off competitors.

Q4: What are the key strategic considerations in navigating DK2327692’s patent landscape?
A: Conduct comprehensive freedom-to-operate analyses, monitor overlapping patents, and consider filing international applications to expand protections.

Q5: What might be the typical lifespan of DK2327692’s patent rights?
A: Generally, around 20 years from the filing date, with potential extensions via SPCs in regions like the EU or US.


References

  1. European Patent Office (EPO) Patent Abstracts.
  2. WIPO Patentscope database.
  3. Danish Patent and Trademark Office (DKPTO) records.
  4. Patent landscape reports on therapeutic chemical classes (e.g., kinase inhibitors, antibiotics).
  5. European Patent Convention and Patent Law guidelines.

Note: Due to the proprietary nature of DK2327692, publicly available details are limited; consult primary patent documents for precise claim language and legal status.


This analysis aims to offer business professionals actionable intelligence on DK2327692's patent scope and landscape, facilitating strategic planning and risk assessment within pharmaceutical and biotech sectors.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.