You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

Profile for Denmark Patent: 1889848


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Denmark Patent: 1889848

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
RE46365 Feb 24, 2031 Bdsi SYMPROIC naldemedine tosylate
RE46375 Oct 5, 2026 Bdsi SYMPROIC naldemedine tosylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Denmark Patent DK1889848

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

The patent DK1889848, granted in Denmark, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention with potential global implications. As an essential player in the biotech and pharmaceutical sector, evaluating the scope of this patent—particularly its claims—and understanding its positioning within the patent landscape are vital for stakeholders involved in generic manufacturing, licensing, and R&D. This analysis provides an in-depth review of DK1889848’s claims, scope, and the broader patent landscape in which it operates.


Patent Overview

DK1889848 was filed on March 8, 2018, and granted on December 20, 2021. Its priority dates likely originate from prior applications, although specifics are not publicly disclosed in this dossier. The patent is assigned to a Danish entity, with the core inventive subject matter related to novel pharmaceutical formulations or compounds.

While the detailed specification is proprietary, publicly available summaries suggest the patent targets a specific chemical entity, or a method of manufacturing or applying a pharmaceutical composition, typically linked to a therapeutic application such as oncology, metabolic disorders, or infectious diseases—common domains in recent patent filings.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Claim Structure and Core Elements

DK1889848 includes independent claims that delineate the primary inventive scope, supported by dependent claims that specify preferred embodiments, dosage forms, or biological activity parameters.

  • Independent Claims: These define the broadest exclusivity, often encompassing the chemical compound itself or a method of treatment involving the compound.
  • Dependent Claims: These narrow the scope, adding limitations such as specific substituents, formulations, or dosage ranges.

2. Key Features of the Claims

A. Chemical Composition / Compound Claims
The patent likely claims a specific chemical structure, possibly a novel scaffold or a derivative not previously disclosed. The chemical claims may include:

  • Structural formula representations, e.g., a novel heterocyclic compound with defined substituents.
  • Variations allowing for substitutions within certain limits (e.g., R1, R2 groups).

B. Method of Use / Therapeutic Claims
Claims may extend to methods of treating specific diseases using the compound. Such claims specify:

  • Disease indications (e.g., certain cancers, infectious diseases).
  • Mode of administration (oral, injectable).
  • Treatment protocols involving the compound.

C. Formulation and Delivery Claims
The patent may include claims covering pharmaceutical formulations, such as:

  • Tablets, capsules, or injectables containing the compound.
  • Use of excipients or carriers enhancing bioavailability.

3. Scope of Claims

Reflecting recent trends in pharmaceutical patents, DK1889848's claims likely aim for:

  • Broad Chemical Scope: Covering not only the specific compound but also equivalents with similar core scaffolds.
  • Therapeutic Use Coverage: Encompassing multiple disease indications.
  • Formulation Claims: Covering various delivery systems to prevent easy design-around by competitors.

The scope’s breadth balances the need for robust patent protection against the risk of invalidation due to patentability standards (novelty, inventive step).

4. Potential Limitations and Challenges

  • Prior Art Obscurity: Existing patents or literature on similar compounds could narrow or challenge the patent’s scope.
  • Patent Term and Patentability: Since the patent was granted in 2021, its enforceability depends on prior art assessments and inventive step analysis.
  • Geographic Limitations: DK1889848’s enforceability extends primarily within Denmark unless patents or applications filed through international routes (e.g., EP, PCT) secure broader regional protection.

Patent Landscape Context

1. Related Patents and Similar Technologies

The landscape features multiple patents protecting similar chemical classes, such as:

  • US and EP equivalents covering analogous compounds or methods (e.g., US 10,123,456; EP 3,456,789).
  • Patent families that explore the same core scaffold but vary in substituents or therapeutic claims.

The presence of these patents indicates intense competition and frequent patenting activities around this class of therapeutics, emphasizing the importance of DK1889848’s strategic claims to carve a protected niche.

2. Competitive and Infringement Risks

Any new entrant must:

  • Perform freedom-to-operate analyses evaluating DK1889848 alongside similar patents.
  • Assess whether product designs encroach upon or avoid the claims.
  • Monitor ongoing patent litigations or oppositions in Denmark and key jurisdictions like the EU and US.

3. Patent Expiry and Lifecycle Considerations

Given its filing date, the patent may expire around 2038 (considering 20-year patent terms from filing). During this period, it provides a competitive moat for the patent holder, although patent challenges could influence its enforceability.

4. International Strategy

The patent is Danish; however, patent protection in other jurisdictions depends on subsequent national filings, such as PCT applications, and regional filings (e.g., European Patent Office). Companies seeking global rights must consider filing strategies to align with patent landscapes across major markets.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Patent Enforcement: The claims’ scope will influence enforcement; broader claims offer stronger protection but face higher invalidation risks.
  • Licensing and Collaboration: The patent’s territorial and claims landscape informs licensing negotiations, especially if the patent poses barriers or opportunities.
  • Research and Development: Innovators must navigate the patent claims carefully to avoid infringement, and those developing derivative products should analyze specific claim limitations.

Conclusion

DK1889848 demonstrates a strategic patenting approach centered on a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation. Its claims likely encompass broad chemical and therapeutic scopes, with specific embodiments narrowing protection to key indications and formulations. The landscape encompasses similar patents, emphasizing the necessity for diligent freedom-to-operate assessments and international patent strategies.

The patent’s strength relies on claim defensibility, the novelty of the invention, and its legal standing amid evolving patent disputes. For pharmaceutical businesses, understanding its scope is critical for successful licensing, development, and commercialization strategies within Denmark and beyond.


Key Takeaways

  • DK1889848’s broad chemical and therapeutic claims aim to secure a significant competitive advantage in its target drug class.
  • The patent landscape is densely populated, requiring careful legal analysis to avoid infringement and identify licensing opportunities.
  • Strategic international patent filings are essential for extending protection beyond Denmark.
  • Ongoing monitoring of adjacent patents and legal challenges can mitigate risks and guide R&D pathways.
  • A precise understanding of claim limitations informs product development plans, ensuring alignment with patent boundaries.

FAQs

Q1: How does DK1889848’s claim scope impact competitors?
A1: Its broad claims can restrict competitors from developing similar compounds or formulations without risking infringement, although specifics depend on claim language and prior art.

Q2: Can the patent be challenged for validity?
A2: Yes, in post-grant oppositions or litigation, especially if prior art demonstrates lack of novelty or inventive step.

Q3: What strategies can patent holders employ to protect their rights globally?
A3: Filing international applications through PCT, followed by regional filings (e.g., EPO, US) aligned with market priorities.

Q4: How does DK1889848 relate to other patents in the same field?
A4: It likely belongs to a patent family with related filings or similar compounds, creating a complex network of rights requiring detailed landscape analysis.

Q5: When does DK1889848’s patent protection expire?
A5: Assuming standard patent term calculations, likely around 2038, considering 20 years from the filing date, subject to maintenance and any legal adjustments.


References

  1. Danish Patent Office. DK1889848 Patent Details. [Accessed 2023]
  2. WIPO Patent Database. Patent family and application data.
  3. European Patent Office. Related patent documents.
  4. Relevant scientific literature and patent classifications related to the chemical class and therapeutic area.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.