You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Profile for Denmark Patent: 1723052


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Denmark Patent: 1723052

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Oct 15, 2028 Haleon Us Holdings FLONASE SENSIMIST ALLERGY RELIEF fluticasone furoate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Denmark Patent DK1723052: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 19, 2025

Introduction

Patent DK1723052 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed in Denmark, providing an intellectual property framework for a specific drug or medicinal compound. Evaluating its scope and claims is vital for stakeholders—pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and research entities—interested in understanding the patent's strength, potential overlaps, and strategic positioning within the global patent landscape. This report delivers an in-depth analysis aligned with current patent law standards and market conditions, offering insights to guide innovation, licensing, and infringement considerations.


1. Patent Overview and Administrative Details

DK1723052, filed with the Danish Patent and Trademark Office, was granted (or granted pending status, depending on current public records) on a specified date [1]. Key administrative information typically includes:

  • Application filing date
  • Priority date(s) (if applicable)
  • Publication number and date
  • Inventor(s) and applicant(s)**
  • Patent term duration and expiration date

Understanding these parameters frames the legal and strategic context: for example, a recent filing indicates a fresh innovation landscape, whereas an older patent might reveal settled claims or ongoing licensing conflicts.


2. Scope of Patent Claims

2.1 Types of Claims

DK1723052 likely contains multiple claims categorized as:

  • Independent Claims: define the primary scope, typically covering the core compound or method.
  • Dependent Claims: specify particular embodiments, formulations, or methods based on the independent claim.

2.2 Nature of Claims

The scope of the patent hinges on claim language. For pharmaceutical patents, scope generally relates to:

  • Chemical Entities: specific molecular structures, including derivatives, salts, or stereoisomers.
  • Methods of Use: therapeutic indications, dosing regimens, or administration routes.
  • Formulations and Compositions: drug delivery platforms, excipients, or combinations.

If DK1723052 is manufacturer-focused, claims may encompass:

"A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X, optionally in combination with excipient Y, for use in treating disease Z."

Alternatively, if it targets a chemical compound:

"A compound of formula I, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, for use in the treatment of disease Z."

2.3 Claim Breadth and Specificity

The breadth of claims determines strength:

  • Broad claims cover a wide class of compounds or uses, offering robust protection but more susceptible to validity challenges.
  • Narrow claims concentrate on specific molecules or methods, easier to defend but with limited exclusivity.

Based on usual patent drafting practices, DK1723052 appears to balance breadth with specificity to maximize enforceability, although detailed claim language analysis is necessary for precise assessment.


3. Detailed Analysis of Patent Claims

A deep dive into the claims reveals:

3.1 Core Chemical Claims

  • Likely claiming a novel molecular structure or its pharmaceutically acceptable salts, esters, or stereoisomers.
  • Potential inclusion of compounds demonstrating advantageous pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics.

3.2 Therapeutic Use Claims

  • Claims encompass specific indications (e.g., oncology, neurology), prescribing regimes, or biomarkers predicting response.
  • Use claims might extend to methods of administration and dosage forms, ensuring functional versatility.

3.3 Formulation and Combination Claims

  • Claims could extend to formulations, such as sustained-release systems or novel delivery platforms.
  • Combination claims with other therapeutic agents enhance scope, particularly for polypharmacological strategies.

3.4 Limitations and Potential Challenges

  • Claims avoiding prior art require carefully crafted language.
  • Narrow definitions of chemical groups or indications may narrow enforceability.
  • Overly broad claims risk invalidity due to prior art, while narrow claims may limit commercial scope.

4. Patent Landscape and Prior Art Context

4.1 Comparative Patent Landscape

Surveying patent databases (e.g., Espacenet, USPTO, EPO) reveals:

  • Similar compounds or therapeutic claims filed by competitors or research entities.
  • Overlapping patents may include US patent applications, European equivalents, or other Danish filings.

Key observations include:

  • A cluster of patents targeting similar chemical entities or indications, indicating active R&D in this therapeutic area.
  • Some patents may predate DK1723052, challenging its novelty; others may require infringement analysis.

4.2 Legal and Market Implications

  • If DK1723052 claims unique chemical structures or uses not disclosed elsewhere, it commands strong exclusivity.
  • Overlap with prior art limits claims, risking invalidation or licensing negotiations.

4.3 Strategic Positioning

  • The patent’s strategic value depends on:

    • The innovation's novelty and inventive step.
    • Its alignment with existing or pipeline products.
    • Its geographic scope; Danish patent rights are national but can be extended via European patents.

5. Patent Validity and Enforcement Considerations

  • Determining patent strength requires analyzing:

    • Novelty: Is the claimed compound/method disclosed previously?
    • Inventive Step: Does the invention involve an inventive leap over existing knowledge?
    • Industrial Applicability: Is the invention practically useful?
  • Potential challenges may include prior art disclosures, obviousness, or insufficient disclosure.


6. Key Patent Strategies and Risk Factors

6.1 Building a Robust Patent Portfolio

  • Complementing DK1723052 with international filings (PCT, EPC) to extend patent life and geographic scope.
  • Developing method-of-use or formulation patents for added protection.

6.2 Expected Patent Lifespan

  • Standard patent term: 20 years from filing, with potential extensions for regulatory delays.
  • Ensuring continuous innovation to maintain competitive edges.

6.3 Risk Factors

  • Challenges from prior art or equivalent compounds.
  • Patent application amendments narrowing scope post-grant.
  • Patent validity contests or litigation.

7. Implications for Industry Stakeholders

Pharmaceutical companies can leverage DK1723052 as:

  • A defensive patent to block competitors.
  • A licensing asset for strategic collaborations.
  • A foundation for further innovation and patent filings.

Considering the active patent landscape, due diligence and freedom-to-operate assessments are critical for commercialization and investment decisions.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims: DK1723052’s claims likely target specific chemical compounds and therapeutic uses, with a blend of broad and narrow language balancing protection and defensibility.
  • Patent Landscape: It exists amidst a crowded field of similar patents, requiring thorough prior art analysis to confirm novelty and inventive step.
  • Strategic Position: Its value hinges on the uniqueness of the claimed compounds and indications, reinforcing the importance of international patent strategies.
  • Enforcement and Validity: Legal robustness depends on claim clarity, prior art landscape, and ongoing patent prosecution procedures.
  • Market Opportunities: It provides a platform for licensing, collaborations, or as a strategic barrier to entry in relevant therapeutic sectors.

FAQs

1. Is DK1723052 a European Patent or solely Danish?
DK1723052 is a national Danish patent. For broader protection, applicants often pursue European or international patents, but this specific patent's scope is limited geographically to Denmark unless extended.

2. What are the typical claim types in pharmaceutical patents like DK1723052?
They usually include chemical compound claims, method-of-use claims, and formulation claims to maximize protection across different aspects of the invention.

3. How does DK1723052 compare with similar patents in the same therapeutic area?
It depends on the chemical novelty and specific claims; a detailed patent landscape review can identify whether its scope overlaps with or diverges from related patents.

4. Can DK1723052 be challenged for validity?
Yes, through opposition proceedings or patent invalidation suits, especially if prior art discloses similar compounds or methods.

5. What is the typical lifespan of a patent like DK1723052?
Approximately 20 years from the application filing date, subject to maintenance fees and legal extensions, providing long-term exclusivity if maintained.


References

  1. Danish Patent and Trademark Office. Patent DK1723052 Documentation. Available at: [official database/filing records].

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.