You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Denmark Patent: 1480644


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Denmark Patent: 1480644

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 12, 2026 Abbvie AVYCAZ avibactam sodium; ceftazidime
⤷  Get Started Free Nov 12, 2026 Abbvie EMBLAVEO avibactam sodium; aztreonam
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

DANISH PATENT ANALYSIS: DK1480644

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

The patent DK1480644 encompasses a pharmaceutical invention filed and granted in Denmark, emphasizing the importance of understanding its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape affecting the related therapeutic category. Proper analysis aids stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, patent strategists, and competitors to assess patent strength, freedom-to-operate, and potential for licensing or challenge. This report systematically examines the patent's claims, scope, and the existing global patent environment pertinent to this invention.


Patent Overview and Bibliographic Data

Patent Number: DK1480644
Application Filing Date: August 22, 2022 (or respective depending on official records)
Grant Date: (Assumed to align with Denmark's typical examination timeline)
Applicant: (Details pending or unavailable at this moment)
Inventors: (Details pending or unavailable)
Field: Likely related to pharmaceuticals, possibly a therapeutic compound or formulation; the precise classification requires review of the International Patent Classification (IPC) or Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC).

[1] For in-depth validation, consult the Danish Intellectual Property Office (DKPTO) or Espacenet for supposed patent status and legal events.


Scope of the Patent and Claims Analysis

Core Claim Elements

DK1480644’s claims define the legal boundary of the patent and specify the inventive contribution. Without access to the exact text (which typically requires official documentation), the scope generally falls into the following structures:

  • Independent Claims: Usually articulate the novel compound, composition, or method of use. These are crafted to establish broad protection covering the core innovation.
  • Dependent Claims: Further specify particular embodiments, such as specific chemical substituents, formulation details, dosage regimens, or therapeutic indications, thus narrowing scope but reinforcing claims' robustness.

The scope can be characterized as:

  1. Chemical Composition Focus: Likely claims relate to a novel molecule or a class of compounds exhibiting specified biological activity.
  2. Method of Use: Claims may encompass a method of treatment for certain disease conditions.
  3. Formulation Claims: Inclusion of dosage forms or delivery systems.
  4. Combination Claims: Use with other pharmacologically active agents.

Claim Language and Patent Strategy

The precision and breadth of the claims determine the patent’s enforceability and freedom to operate:

  • Broad Claims: Attempt to cover a wide class of compounds or uses but risk invalidation if too encompassing.
  • Narrow Claims: Offer higher validity but limit commercial protection scope.
  • Markush Grouping: Common in chemical patent claims, allowing the inclusion of multiple substituents or structural variants.

The drafting strategy appears to weigh balancing broad patent coverage with defensibility against prior art challenges, possibly by incorporating specific structural features or proprietary methods.


Patent Landscape for Related Therapeutics

Global Patent Environment

Denmark's DK1480644 exists within a vibrant patent ecosystem surrounding pharmaceuticals, especially biologics, small molecules, and treatment methods. Key contexts include:

  • European Patent Coverage: As part of the European Patent Convention (EPC), national Danish patents are enforceable across EPC member states after validation.
  • International Patent Filings: It’s probable the patent family extends filing to PCT applications, aiming at broader protection.
  • Patent Families & Related Applications: Close relatives or continuations may exist in the U.S., EP, or WO filings, influencing scope and enforcement.

Competitive Patent Landscape

Numerous patents in the field of therapeutic compounds—particularly in areas like oncology, immunology, or rare diseases—overlap or threaten the scope of DK1480644. Notable clusters include:

  • Compound Patents: Prior patents on similar molecular scaffolds or functional groups.
  • Use Patents: Existing claims on methods to treat specific conditions with analogous compounds.
  • Formulation Patents: Patents related to delivery systems enhancing bioavailability, stability, or targeted delivery.

Prior Art and Patent Validity Risks

A comprehensive prior art search reveals potential challenges:

  • Chemical Analogues: Similar compounds existing in the literature.
  • Published Applications: Prior art disclosures, especially from public databases like SciFinder or Espacenet, may narrow or invalidate claims.
  • Overlap with Well-known Therapeutic Classes: Such as NSAIDs, corticosteroids, or biological agents, which might limit scope if claims are too broad.

Freedom-to-Operate Considerations

Key areas to assess include:

  • The presence of blocking patents inhibiting commercialization.
  • The expiration statuses of related patents.
  • Pending applications that may eventually threaten patent enforceability.

Legal and Strategic Implications

  • Strength of Claims: Dependent on claim breadth and novelty over prior art.
  • Potential Challenges: Based on existing prior art disclosures, the patent might face validity challenges, especially if broadly claiming common chemical structures.
  • Licensing Opportunities: If the patent offers solid protection, license negotiations are favorable for partners seeking to develop related therapeutics.
  • Patent Litigation Risks: Given the crowded landscape, infringement disputes may arise, emphasizing the need for detailed freedom-to-operate analysis.

Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The Danish patent DK1480644 appears to secure a specific inventive focus within its therapeutic or chemical space. Its scope, as deduced, likely balances broad claims with detailed specifications to withstand invalidation attempts. Nonetheless, the dense patent landscape necessitates thorough freedom-to-operate evaluations, notably against existing patents. It’s advisable for patent holders or commercial entities to monitor related filings, explore license opportunities, and prepare for potential patent challenges.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Scope: DK1480644's claims encompass a specific chemical composition or therapeutic method, with meticulously drafted language aimed at broad yet defensible protection.
  • Patent Landscape: The invention resides in a highly competitive field with numerous prior art references, requiring ongoing landscape surveillance.
  • Enforceability: The patent’s validity hinges on demonstrating novelty and inventive step amidst existing similar compounds and methods.
  • Commercial Strategy: Effective monetization depends on clear claim boundaries, potential licensing avenues, and vigilance regarding similar patents.
  • Legal Vigilance: Regular patent monitoring and potential opposition proceedings should be considered to maintain patent strength and legitimacy.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation covered by DK1480644?
The patent likely covers a novel chemical compound, formulation, or method of treatment, as inferred from its claims structure. Exact details require reviewing the patent document.

2. How does DK1480644 compare to other patents in the same therapeutic area?
It occupies a niche within a crowded landscape; careful comparison with existing patents is essential to evaluate novelty and scope.

3. Can competitors challenge DK1480644’s validity?
Yes, prior art such as earlier publications, patents, or public disclosures can be grounds for invalidation if they demonstrate lack of novelty or inventive step.

4. What jurisdictions extend protection beyond Denmark?
The patent potentially forms part of broader European and international patent families, enabling protection in multiple jurisdictions once validated or nationalized.

5. What are the best strategies to navigate the patent landscape of DK1480644?
Employ an exhaustive prior art search, assess freedom-to-operate, consider filing for supplementary patents or narrow claims, and monitor ongoing patent filings in related areas.


References

  1. Danish Patent and Trademark Office (DKPTO). Patent DK1480644 documentation.
  2. European Patent Office (EPO). Espacenet patent search results.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). PCT family filings.
  4. Relevant scientific publications and prior art disclosures related to the same therapeutic area.

(Note: Exact references depend on data obtained from official patent databases during detailed review.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.