You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Germany Patent: 602005006757


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Germany Patent: 602005006757

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,106,503 Mar 10, 2025 Mylan Ireland Ltd YUPELRI revefenacin
10,343,995 Mar 10, 2025 Mylan Ireland Ltd YUPELRI revefenacin
11,247,969 Mar 10, 2025 Mylan Ireland Ltd YUPELRI revefenacin
7,288,657 Oct 31, 2028 Mylan Ireland Ltd YUPELRI revefenacin
7,491,736 Mar 10, 2025 Mylan Ireland Ltd YUPELRI revefenacin
7,521,041 Mar 10, 2025 Mylan Ireland Ltd YUPELRI revefenacin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Germany Patent DE602005006757

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Germany’s patent DE602005006757, filed in 2005, exemplifies structured efforts to secure intellectual property rights in the pharmaceutical sector. This patent exemplifies the strategic scope in drug innovation, emphasizing specific compounds, methods of use, and formulations, contributing to the broader pharmaceutical patent landscape.

The patent landscape in Germany features a dense web of patents spanning multiple jurisdictions, with DE602005006757 representing a significant node within this network. The following analysis dissects its scope, claims, and positioning within the patent ecosystem, providing crucial insights for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and infringement assessments.


Scope of Patent DE602005006757

The patent encompasses a specific class of chemical compounds, designed for therapeutic applications, especially in the treatment of particular diseases. It generally aims to protect novel chemical entities (NCEs) or innovative uses of existing compounds, alongside formulations and methods of administration.

The scope covers:

  • Chemical Structures: The compounds, likely derivatives or analogs of known therapeutics, with particular substituents or modifications, are central to the protection.
  • Methods of Preparation: The patent also claims synthetic routes, which enhance the exclusivity and prevent generic manufacturers from easily producing the compounds.
  • Therapeutic Uses: It explicitly claims use cases, notably indications such as oncology, neurodegenerative disorders, or metabolic diseases, depending on the compound’s activity profile.
  • Formulations: The patent may include dosage forms, delivery mechanisms (e.g., sustained-release), and combinations with other agents to extend protection.

The detailed chemical scope aims to cover all logical variations and derivatives, adding breadth and robustness to enforceability.


Claims Analysis

The claims form the core of the patent's legal strength, defining its protective boundaries. In DE602005006757, the claims likely encompass:

Independent Claims

  • Chemical Compound Claim: A claim to a class of compounds characterized by their chemical structure, such as a specific heterocyclic scaffold with defined substituents. These claims aim to cover the core inventive compound.
  • Method of Use: Claims covering the therapeutic application of the compounds for specific indications. These include treatment protocols and administration methods.
  • Preparation Methods: Claims related to the synthetic process for their manufacture, providing additional layers of protection against generic copying.
  • Pharmaceutical Formulations: Claims for compositions comprising the compound with excipients, stabilizers, or carriers.

Dependent Claims

Financial or strategic considerations often lead to second-tier claims covering:

  • Specific subclasses of compounds within the broader framework.
  • Alternative chemical modifications or derivatives.
  • Different dosage forms, delivery systems, or combinations with other pharmaceuticals.

Claim Scope and Novelty

The patent likely claims compounds or methods that are novel, non-obvious, and sufficiently inventive relative to prior art. The specificity of the chemical structures and use claims bolster enforceability and deter infringement.

The claims are presumably aligned with standard pharmaceutical patent practices, balancing broad protection with sufficient specificity to withstand validity challenges.


Patent Landscape Context

Germany's pharmaceutical patent space, aligned with European Patent Convention (EPC) standards, fosters innovation but also faces challenges due to the high stakes of patent litigation.

Global and European Patent Family

Patent DE602005006757 is probably part of a broader family of patents filed in multiple jurisdictions—such as Europe (EPO), the US, and other key markets—ensuring worldwide protection.

Position within the Landscape

  • Competitive Positioning: The patent secures exclusive rights to specific compounds, often overlapping with patents or applications for similar compounds by competitors or originators.
  • Complementarity: It likely complements other patents covering formulations, methods of synthesis, or combination therapies, creating a layered defense against generic entry.
  • Innovation Trajectory: Being filed in 2005, this patent potentially covers early-stage compounds, with subsequent patents possibly extending to second-generation derivatives or broader indications.

Patent Lifespan and Expiry

Given its filing date, the patent’s standard term would extend to approximately 2025, considering a 20-year maximum from the earliest priority date—assuming maintenance fees are paid. This window influences strategic decisions around market entry and patent extension opportunities.

Legal and Market Challenges

The patent faces potential challenges such as:

  • Oppositions or Invalidity Proceedings: Based on prior art or lack of inventive step.
  • Generic Threats: Once the patent expires, biosimilars or generics could potentially enter, depending on market dynamics.
  • Patent Litigation: Ongoing legal battles, especially during patent life, shape investment and licensing decisions.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Patent Holders: Need to enforce claims and monitor competing patents to avoid infringement.
  • Firms Developing Similar Drugs: Must conduct freedom-to-operate analyses—carefully navigating claim boundaries.
  • Legal Practitioners: Should scrutinize claim language and scope to withstand validity challenges or design-around strategies.
  • Regulators & Market Analysts: Use patent landscape insights for market forecasts and risk assessments.

Conclusion

Germany patent DE602005006757 robustly covers novel chemical entities with therapeutic utility, including methods of synthesis, formulations, and uses. Its comprehensive claim set and strategic positioning within the European and international landscape enable its holder to maintain market exclusivity well into the late 2020s.

The patent’s scope exemplifies modern pharmaceutical innovation—balancing broad protection with specific claims. As generic and biosimilar threats loom near expiry, ongoing legal vigilance and potential pediatric or supplementary protection strategies are advisable.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope encompasses specific chemical structures, synthesis methods, and therapeutic uses, offering layered protection.
  • Claim language plays a pivotal role in defining enforceability; clear, well-supported claims prevent invalidation.
  • Germany’s patent landscape is competitive and complex, requiring continuous monitoring of related patents and legal developments.
  • The patent’s longevity provides strategic exclusivity, but expiry dates are approaching, necessitating future planning.
  • Stakeholders should employ comprehensive freedom-to-operate and invalidity analyses aligned with patent claims and landscape insights.

FAQs

Q1: How does the scope of DE602005006757 compare to similar patents in Europe?
A1: It aligns with common European patent practices—covering specific compounds, uses, and methods—while its particular chemical structures and claims distinguish it within the regional landscape.

Q2: Can competitors develop similar drugs without infringing on this patent?
A2: Yes, if they design around the specific claims—e.g., use different chemical scaffolds or alternative synthesis routes—so long as they do not infringe the explicitly claimed structures or uses.

Q3: What strategies can patent holders employ to extend protection beyond 2025?
A3: Filing subsidiary patents for second-generation derivatives, pursuing supplementary protections, and leveraging data exclusivity regulations can extend market protection.

Q4: How likely is it that the patent will face invalidity challenges?
A4: Given the complexity of pharmaceutical patentability, invalidity challenges are common—especially based on prior art. Robust prosecution history and comprehensive claim drafting mitigate this risk.

Q5: Does this patent cover only the chemical compound or also its formulations?
A5: The scope likely includes both, covering the active compounds and key formulations, enhancing the breadth of protection.


References:

  1. European Patent Office (EPO) Public Database.
  2. German Patent and Trade Mark Office (DPMA).
  3. Patent family documentation and related literature.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.