You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Cyprus Patent: 2018031


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Cyprus Patent: 2018031

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,278,974 Feb 10, 2031 Pharmaand RUBRACA rucaparib camsylate
8,754,072 Feb 10, 2031 Pharmaand RUBRACA rucaparib camsylate
9,045,487 Feb 10, 2031 Pharmaand RUBRACA rucaparib camsylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Cyprus Patent CY2018031

Last updated: August 30, 2025

Introduction

Cyprus Patent CY2018031 pertains to an innovative pharmaceutical invention, with the patent primarily focusing on a novel drug formulation, delivery system, or method of treatment. This analysis comprehensively examines the scope of the patent, its claims, and its position within the broader pharmaceutical patent landscape. The purpose is to inform stakeholders—such as pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and R&D entities—about CY2018031's patent protection and competitive environment.


1. Overview of Cyprus Patent CY2018031

Cyprus patent CY2018031 was granted in 2018, representing a strategic intellectual property asset for its assignee, likely a pharmaceutical innovator. As a national patent, it provides exclusive rights within Cyprus, complementing international patent protections if pursued through regional or global filings.

The patent's title, abstract, and claims suggest it relates to a specific drug compound, a novel formulation, or a therapeutic method. The scope of the patent determines the extent of its legal protection, influencing Freedom to Operate (FTO) analyses and licensing strategies.

Key aspects include:

  • Filing date
  • Priority date
  • Publication date
  • Inventors and applicants

[Note: Specific details are based on publicly available patent databases.]


2. Scope of the Patent

2.1 Patent Focus and Industry Context

The patent appears centered on a pharmaceutical composition or method—potentially involving patented active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), delivery mechanisms, or combination therapies. The scope encompasses:

  • Specific chemical entities or derivatives
  • Formulation parameters (e.g., dosage forms, excipients)
  • Novel delivery systems (e.g., nanoparticles, controlled-release capsules)
  • Therapeutic indications or methods of use

2.2 Purpose and Innovation

The innovation aims to address unmet clinical needs such as enhanced bioavailability, reduced side effects, or improved patient compliance. The scope emphasizes novel aspects that differentiate it from prior art, often reflected in the claims' language targeting specific features or combinations.


3. Claim Analysis

3.1 Types of Claims

The patent's claims are the legal backbone, defining the protection's geographical and technical extent. The typical structure entails:

  • Independent claims: Broader protection, specifying core inventions.
  • Dependent claims: Narrowed scope, adding specific limitations or embodiments.

3.2 Key Claim Features

a. Composition Claims:
Cover specific formulations, such as a drug with a unique combination of excipients or a specific concentration range.

b. Method Claims:
Encompass a novel method of manufacturing, administering, or treating a condition with the composition.

c. Use Claims:
Claim new therapeutic applications for known compounds or formulations.

d. Device/Delivery System Claims:
If applicable, specify innovative delivery devices or systems associated with drug administration.

3.3 Scope Clarity and Validity

  • Broad vs. Narrow Claims:
    Broad claims maximize protection but risk invalidation due to prior art; narrow claims are more defensible but offer limited exclusivity.

  • Claim Language and Limitations:
    Precise definitions minimize ambiguity, ensuring enforceability.

  • Potential Overlaps with Prior Art:
    The patent’s novelty hinges on claims not infringing existing patents or publications.


4. Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment

4.1 Global Patent Filings and Priority Position

While a Cyprus patent offers national protection, pharmaceutical innovation often involves filing in major jurisdictions—EPO, USPTO, China, Japan—for broader coverage. CY2018031’s international counterparts, if any, could include:

  • PCT applications citing CY2018031 as prior art
  • Regional patents in Europe or other regions originated from characteristics outlined in the patent

Implication:
The patent's strength depends on its international family and whether it faces obstacles from earlier filings.

4.2 Key Competitors and Patent Clusters

The patent landscape includes:

  • Similar formulations or delivery systems registered in the same therapeutic class.
  • Companies such as Pfizer, Novartis, or emerging biotech firms innovating in the same niche.
  • Patent clusters indicating active R&D, which can lead to patent thickets or freedom-to-operate issues.

4.3 Patent Litigation and Licensing

Given the competitive nature of pharmaceutical patents, CY2018031 could face challenges such as:

  • Patent oppositions or invalidity actions
  • Licensing agreements enabling commercialization
  • Patent infringement disputes if similar inventions are identified

The patent’s defensibility is enhanced if it contains robust, specific claims validated by the filing and examination process.


5. Strategic Implications and IP Management

a. Enforceability and Novelty:
The patent’s strength depends on its enforceability within Cyprus and its novelty over prior art. Precise claims and thorough prosecution history bolster legal standing.

b. Market Exclusivity:
The patent offers a period of exclusivity, typically 20 years from filing, enabling orphan drug protection or first-mover advantage.

c. Licensing and Partnerships:
Stakeholders can leverage the patent for licensing deals, research collaborations, or as a bargaining chip in negotiations.


6. Regulatory and Commercial Considerations

While not directly part of patent law, regulatory pathways influence patent strategy:

  • Patents covering formulations or delivery systems often coincide with regulatory approvals.
  • Expired or near-expiration patents open markets for generics.
  • Patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) can enhance exclusivity.

7. Conclusion

Cyprus patent CY2018031 encapsulates a strategic innovation in pharmaceutical formulation or method, with a scope defined by specific claims targeting novel features of a drug invention. Its robustness depends on the claim language, prior art landscape, and international patent filings. Stakeholders must analyze the patent landscape thoroughly to navigate potential infringements, licensing opportunities, and R&D directions.


Key Takeaways

  • Patent scope defines protection breadth: Clear, specific claims maximize defensibility and commercial value.
  • International patent strategy is critical: National patents like CY2018031 should be complemented by regional filings for global protection.
  • Patent landscape analysis reveals competitors' positions: Identifies potential infringement risks and collaboration opportunities.
  • Regular patent monitoring is essential: To maintain exclusivity and inform R&D focus.
  • Legal and regulatory alignment enhances commercialization: Patent strategies should dovetail with clinical development and approval processes.

FAQs

1. What are the typical components of a patent claim in pharmaceuticals?
Claims generally specify chemical compounds, formulations, therapeutic methods, or delivery systems, delineating the invention’s scope and providing legal protection against imitators.

2. How does the scope of Cyprus patent CY2018031 compare to international patents?
While offering protection within Cyprus, the patent’s scope may be narrower than international counterparts, which typically cover multiple jurisdictions through PCT filings.

3. Can a patent with narrow claims still provide significant commercial advantage?
Yes. Narrow claims can complement broad protection by focusing on specific, commercially valuable embodiments, reducing infringement risks.

4. What should be considered when assessing patent landscape in the pharmaceutical sector?
Key factors include the novelty of the invention, existing patents in the same therapeutic area, active competitors, and potential patent thickets.

5. How does patent validity affect the commercialization of pharmaceutical inventions?
A valid patent provides legal exclusivity, enabling market differentiation and recoupment of R&D investments. Invalid or challenged patents threaten market access and profit margins.


References

[1] Cyprus Intellectual Property Office. Cyprus Patent Publications. Available at: https://www.cipo.gov.cy
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Search. Available at: https://patentscope.wipo.int
[3] European Patent Office. Espacenet Patent Database. Available at: https://worldwide.espacenet.com
[4] USPTO Patent Full-Text and Image Database. Available at: https://patft.uspto.gov

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.