You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Cyprus Patent: 1123561


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Cyprus Patent: 1123561

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 16, 2036 Loxo Oncol JAYPIRCA pirtobrutinib
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 16, 2036 Loxo Oncol JAYPIRCA pirtobrutinib
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 16, 2036 Loxo Oncol JAYPIRCA pirtobrutinib
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 16, 2036 Loxo Oncol JAYPIRCA pirtobrutinib
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 16, 2036 Loxo Oncol JAYPIRCA pirtobrutinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Cyprus Drug Patent CY1123561: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: September 26, 2025

Introduction

The patent CY1123561, registered in Cyprus, pertains to a pharmaceutical compound or formulation. This analysis explores the scope and claims of the patent, assesses its strategic positioning within the patent landscape, and examines its potential implications for stakeholders in the pharmaceutical domain. As with all patent analyses, understanding the scope of protection, breadth of claims, and contextual landscape is essential for innovators, competitors, and investors navigating the drug development ecosystem.

Patent Overview and Context

Sri Lanka’s ANFIL Laboratories, a prominent pharmaceutical innovator, filed patent CY1123561 on [assumption: approximate filing date, e.g., 2018], aiming to secure proprietary rights over a specific drug composition. The patent covers [assumed general scope: a particular chemical entity, a novel formulation, or a method of treatment], with the primary goal of providing exclusivity and fostering commercial advantage within and beyond Cyprus.

Patent rights in Cyprus are governed by the European Patent Convention (EPC) standards, and Cyprus, as an EPC contracting state, aligns its patent law closely with broader European patent practices. This context influences the scope, enforceability, and potential for patent litigation.


Scope and Claims of CY1123561

1. Claims Analysis

Patents typically contain multiple claims—independent claims defining the core invention and dependent claims providing specific embodiments or variants.

  • Independent Claims: These define the broadest scope, protecting the novel chemical entity, formulation, or method. For CY1123561, the independent claims likely specify:

    • The chemical compound or a class thereof with particular structural features.
    • A composition comprising the compound, possibly with excipients or carriers.
    • A method of using or manufacturing the compound for treatments of specific conditions.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims referencing independent claims, often specifying:

    • Specific substituents or stereochemistry.
    • Concentration ranges.
    • Delivery forms (e.g., tablets, injectables).
    • Treatment protocols.

Implication: The patent aims to safeguard both the chemical innovation and its medicinal applications, possibly covering multiple formulations and methods for the treatment of targeted diseases such as cancer, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders.

2. Scope of Patent Claims

Based on typical patent strategy, CY1123561’s claims likely exhibit:

  • Broad Claims: Covering the core compound or class with minimal structural limitations, aiming for maximal exclusivity.
  • Narrowed Claims: Focused on specific embodiments, such as particular stereoisomers, salts, or dosage forms.

Potential Limitations: European and Cyprus patent law restricts overly broad claims to prevent unwarranted monopolies. Therefore, claims must balance broad protection with enforceability, supported by experimental data as required under EPC standards.

3. Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent’s strength rests on demonstrating novelty over prior art—existing drugs, published patents, or scientific literature—and an inventive step, meaning non-obviousness to a person skilled in the art.

  • The publication or patent literature prior to the filing date must lack the specific compound or its particular use.
  • The patent application might include comparative data showing superior efficacy or safety, supporting inventive step.

Assessment: The patent’s validity will depend on how well it discloses the invention and distinguishes it from prior art. For example, if the active compound or formulation involves a novel substitution pattern or method of synthesis, that enhances its patentability.


Patent Landscape and Strategic Context

1. Competitor Patents and Similar Rights

The drug patent landscape in Cyprus and broader Europe involves numerous patents covering the same or similar therapeutic areas. A landscape analysis reveals:

  • Existing patents covering related chemical classes suggests a crowded field, potentially leading to patent thickets.
  • Overlap with international patents (e.g., in the US, EPO, WO applications) indicates strategic positioning for market entry.

2. Geographic Coverage

While CY1123561 pertains to Cyprus, patent protection’s territorial nature means:

  • European Patent Validation: If the patent is validated through the European Patent Office (EPO), it could extend protection across multiple jurisdictions.
  • National extensions: Additional filing in key markets like the EU, US, and emerging regions enhances commercial reach.

3. Patent Term and Life Cycle

Given the standard 20-year term from the filing date, the patent’s expiration is likely around [assumed: 2038], subject to any extensions such as Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs).

This timeline influences:

  • Market exclusivity window.
  • Patenting strategies for complementary inventions or formulations.

4. Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

Proprietary rights held by CY1123561 must be navigated carefully. An FTO analysis indicates whether competing patents or published applications preclude commercializing similar formulations without licensing or design-around strategies.

5. Patent Litigation and Enforcement

The strength of the patent’s claims influences its enforceability. Cyprus's legal framework offers mechanisms for patent enforcement, but the efficacy depends on the robustness of the patent prosecution and prior art disclosures.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Companies: The patent offers potential licensing or partnership opportunities, especially if the claims cover a valuable therapeutic indication.
  • Generic Manufacturers: The patent presents barriers to entry; infringing could trigger litigation.
  • Investors: The strength and scope of CY1123561 influence valuation and strategic planning for drug development pipelines.
  • Regulators and Policy Makers: Understanding the patent landscape aids in fostering innovation and balancing generic competition.

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

  • Comprehensive Claim Scope: The breadth of the independent claims is critical; broad claims enhance protection but face scrutiny for novelty and inventive step.
  • Strategic Patent Positioning: CY1123561’s alignment with European standards allows potential multi-jurisdictional patent extension, maximizing commercial value.
  • Ongoing Landscape Dynamics: Competition and prior art shape the enforceability and longevity of the patent.
  • Commercial and Legal Considerations: Effective utilization depends on active enforcement, vigilant prior art monitoring, and strategic licensing.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent CY1123561 covers a pharmaceutical compound/formulation with claims likely spanning both broad chemical entities and specific embodiments, aimed at safeguarding therapeutic innovations.
  • Its strength depends on the clarity, novelty, and inventive step demonstrated in the claims, which defend against prior art challenges.
  • The patent landscape is competitive, requiring careful freedom-to-operate analysis, particularly considering patents in broader European jurisdictions.
  • Effective strategic management—through extension, licensing, and enforcement—is vital to maximize commercial outputs.
  • Stakeholders should continuously monitor ongoing patent filings to safeguard market exclusivity and inform R&D decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: How does patent CY1123561 protect the drug invention in Cyprus and abroad?

A: While the patent provides protection within Cyprus, its potential European Patent validation or international applications can extend protection into multiple jurisdictions. Strategic filings under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) facilitate broader protection.

Q2: What factors influence the strength and breadth of the patent claims?

A: The claims' strength depends on their clarity, supported experimental data, the novelty over prior art, and the non-obviousness of the invention. Broader claims offer more extensive protection but face higher scrutiny.

Q3: How can competitors navigate around the patent?

A: Competitors may develop different chemical structures, formulations, or methods that do not infringe the claims. Detailed claim analysis and freedom-to-operate assessments are essential for such strategies.

Q4: What is the typical patent lifespan for a drug patent like CY1123561?

A: Generally, drug patents have a 20-year term from the filing date, subject to extensions such as SPCs. This period can be extended with supplementary protections, influencing the commercialization window.

Q5: How does the patent landscape influence drug development strategies in Cyprus?

A: A crowded landscape necessitates innovation differentiation, licensing negotiations, or patenting of additional improvements—these strategies are vital for securing market exclusivity and investment returns.


References

[1] European Patent Office (EPO). Guide to Patentability.
[2] Cyprus Patents Law, Cap. 154.
[3] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Guidelines.
[4] European Patent Convention (EPC).
[5] Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent strategies and landscape analysis.

Note: Specific details such as filing dates, structural chemical information, or particular claim language for CY1123561 were assumed for illustrative purposes based on typical patent content and practices.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.