You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Cyprus Patent: 1121017


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Cyprus Patent: 1121017

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 18, 2032 Novartis ZYKADIA ceritinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Cyprus Drug Patent CY1121017

Last updated: August 18, 2025

Introduction

Patent CY1121017, granted in Cyprus, pertains to a pharmaceutical composition or method applicable within the domain of drug innovation. As an integral part of the EU and global patent framework, the Cyprus patent offers strategic insights into the intellectual property landscape for the relevant drug or therapeutic class. This report delivers a comprehensive technical and legal analysis of the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape associated with CY1121017, providing critical intelligence for stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, patent attorneys, and licensing entities.


Understanding the Patent: Background and Context

Patent CY1121017 was issued by the Cyprus Patent Office, likely leveraging regional patent harmonization systems through the European Patent Convention or national patent procedures. While the exact filing and priority dates are not provided here, the patent's scope could potentially encompass novel chemical entities, formulations, methods of manufacture, or therapeutic uses, depending on the specific claims made.

In the pharmaceutical patent landscape, such patents often serve to protect innovations that address critical unmet medical needs, provide improved efficacy, or enhance drug stability, delivery, or bioavailability. The scope of the patent delineates the legally enforceable boundary of these innovations and informs competitors about permissible actions.


Scope Analysis of Patent CY1121017

Legal and Technical Boundaries

The scope of CY1121017 is primarily defined by its claims—detailing what is legally protected. Typically, patent claims are categorized as:

  • Independent Claims: Broadly define the core invention, often encompassing the composition or method.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, elaborating on specific embodiments or variants.

Without direct access to the patent document's claims section, a typical analysis involves examining:

  1. Claim Type and Breadth:

    • Is the patent directed towards a specific chemical compound, a class of compounds, or a formulation?
    • Does it claim a method of manufacturing, a therapeutic use, or a combination thereof?
  2. Claim Scope:

    • Are claims broad enough to cover major competitors' innovations?
    • Do they specify particular molecular structures, dosages, or delivery mechanisms?
  3. Claim Language and Limitations:

    • Are there structural limitations, such as chemical substituents or concentration ranges?
    • Are there process limitations, such as specific synthesis steps?

Content Focus

Based on standard patent drafting strategies, CY1121017 likely includes claims covering:

  • Novel compounds or classes: Such as a specific chemical entity with patentable novelty over prior art.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions: Including specific excipient combinations or delivery systems.
  • Therapeutic methods: For treating particular conditions, potentially with application-specific claims.

Scope Implication

The strategic scope aims to confer broad protection while avoiding overgeneralization that risks invalidation. Given the competitive nature of drug patents—often teetering between adequately broad and overly broad—the claims would balance the desire for exclusivity with the need for validity over prior art.


Claims Analysis

While specific claims are not available, typical features of patented drug claims include:

  • Structural characteristics: For example, chemical formulas, stereochemistry, or functional groups.
  • Method claims: Such as methods of synthesis or specific treatment protocols.
  • Formulation claims: Detailing compositions with defined ratios, carriers, or delivery mechanisms.
  • Use claims: Covering therapeutic applications, known as 'second medical use' claims in patent law.

Potential strengths:

  • Broad compound claims could prevent competitors from developing similar derivatives.
  • Method claims could restrict use or manufacturing techniques.

Potential limitations:

  • Narrow language might limit enforcement, especially if dependent claims specify limited embodiments.
  • Overly narrow claims might leave room for design-around strategies.

Patent Landscape and Related IP

PLATFORM patents form the foundation for subsequent innovation and are often surrounded by a landscape of:

  • Prior Art: Existing patents on similar compounds, formulations, or methods.
  • Family Patents: Similar patents filed across multiple jurisdictions, indicating strategic scope.
  • Follow-on Patents: Improvements or specific applications derived from the core patent.

In the pharmaceutical sphere, patent landscapes often reveal:

  • Key competitors holding patents on similar molecules or mechanisms.
  • Potential freedom-to-operate (FTO) issues.
  • Opportunities for licensing, partnerships, or challenges.

Considering Cyprus's close integration with EU patent systems via the European Patent Convention, related patent families likely exist across major jurisdictions such as the EPO, UK, Germany, France, and others.


Patent Validity and Challenges

The validity of CY1121017 hinges on:

  • Novelty: The compound or method must be non-obvious over prior art.
  • Inventive step: Demonstrating inventive contributions over the existing state-of-the-art.
  • Industrial applicability: The invention must have a practical application.

Potential attack points for patent challenges include prior disclosures, obvious modifications, or insufficient disclosure. Conversely, the patent holder might defend the patent's validity with supporting data or expert testimony.


Competitive Landscape and Patent Family Analysis

Given the competitive nature of pharmaceutical patents:

  • Major players may have filed patent families related to CY1121017.
  • Expansion into other jurisdictions strengthens patent protection.
  • Follow-on innovations could dilute patent strength or create freedom to operate issues.

An exhaustive patent search reveals whether CY1121017 forms part of a broader patent family, connected to related applications in the EU, US, or other markets. Cross-referencing patent databases, such as Espacenet or PATENTSCOPE, can identify related filings, citations, and potential infringements.


Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical companies must assess the scope to evaluate patent infringement risks, especially when developing similar compounds or formulations.
  • Patent attorneys should scrutinize claim language for potential weaknesses or opportunities for design-around strategies.
  • Investors benefit from understanding the patent robustness, lifecycle, and potential expiry dates impacting commercial strategies.

Conclusion

Patent CY1121017 exemplifies pharmaceutical innovation efforts, with claims likely focused on specific chemical entities or methods of use. Its scope, shaped by carefully drafted claims, influences licensing strategies, competitive positioning, and potential for generic challenges. The broader patent landscape underscores the importance of robust patent families and strategic filings to secure market exclusivity.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of CY1121017 hinges on the specificity and breadth of its claims, balancing enforceability with validity.
  • Thorough analysis of claim language and prior art is essential to evaluate enforceability and infringement risks.
  • The patent landscape surrounding CY1121017 includes related family patents and potential challenges, and strategic filings can extend its protective reach.
  • Stakeholders should continuously monitor related patents and legal developments to safeguard and leverage the patent rights effectively.
  • Effective positioning requires integrating patent insights with broader regulatory and market strategies.

FAQs

1. What is the primary focus of Cyprus patent CY1121017?
While details are proprietary, it most likely pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or therapeutic method, designed to address specific medical needs within its patent claims.

2. How does patent scope affect the ability to develop similar drugs?
The scope—the breadth of claims—determines what innovations infringe the patent. Broader claims may restrict similar developments, while narrower claims might allow design-arounds or alternative approaches.

3. Are patents filed in Cyprus enforceable only within Cyprus?
Patent rights are territorial; CY1121017 offers protection within Cyprus. For broader protection, patent families would need to be filed in other jurisdictions like Europe, the US, or Asia.

4. Can CY1121017 be challenged for validity?
Yes, any third party can challenge its validity through legal procedures such as opposition or litigation, citing prior art or other grounds.

5. How does patent landscape analysis aid pharmaceutical innovation?
It helps identify patent overlaps, potential infringement risks, and licensing opportunities, guiding R&D toward non-infringing, innovative solutions.


References

  1. European Patent Office (EPO). Patent search tools and patent family data.
  2. Cyprus Patent Office. Official patent documentation.
  3. WIPO PATENTSCOPE. International patent filing and status information.
  4. Google Patents. For referencing related patents and citations.
  5. Legal analysis articles on pharmaceutical patent strategies.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.