You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Cyprus Patent: 1120663


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Cyprus Patent: 1120663

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 4, 2033 Astrazeneca EPANOVA omega-3-carboxylic acids
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 4, 2033 Astrazeneca EPANOVA omega-3-carboxylic acids
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 4, 2033 Astrazeneca EPANOVA omega-3-carboxylic acids
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Cyprus Drug Patent CY1120663

Last updated: August 15, 2025

Introduction

Patent CY1120663, issued by the Republic of Cyprus, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention. Analyzing its scope, claims, and positioning within the patent landscape provides vital insights for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and R&D entities. This report offers a comprehensive examination of these aspects, focusing on patent scope, claim structure, innovative features, and the competitive landscape.


Background and Patent Overview

Cyprus’s patent system adheres to the European Patent Convention (EPC), allowing patent protection within Cyprus which aligns with broader European patent practices. Patent CY1120663 relates to a specific drug formulation or therapeutic method, as suggested by the naming conventions and patent classifications under the European classification system.

While exact patent data (such as filing or grant dates) are not explicitly provided here, a typical patent analysis begins with reviewing the patent document to identify:

  • Title
  • Abstract
  • Claims
  • Description
  • Figures (if applicable)

This information clarifies the technical scope, inventive step, and potential market implications. For this analysis, we focus on the scope and claims, fundamental to defining patent breadth.


Scope of the Patent

Scope refers to the breadth of patent protection conferred and hinges on the claims' wording. Broad claims cover extensive embodiments, providing wider protection but often face increased scrutiny for inventive step. Narrow claims target specific embodiments, offering limited protection but potentially more robust against invalidation.

For CY1120663, the scope likely encompasses:

  • Drug composition or formulation: Specific combinations or dosages of active ingredients.
  • Method of use: Therapeutic methods for treating certain diseases or conditions.
  • Manufacturing process: Unique synthesis or formulation procedures.

The scope's breadth depends on the claims' wording, which must be sufficiently broad to cover competitors but specific enough to meet inventive step and novelty requirements.

Claim Types

Patent claims typically fall into:

  • Product claims: Cover specific pharmaceutical compounds or compositions.
  • Process claims: Cover methods of producing or administering the drug.
  • Use claims: Cover new therapeutic uses.

The patent under review probably includes a combination of these types, with product claims forming the core safeguarding mechanism.


Claims Analysis

Claims are the legal definitions of the patent’s protection. A meticulous review reveals:

Independent Claims

  • Usually, the broadest claims, outlining essential features of the invention.
  • For a drug patent, this might specify an active compound or a combination thereof, including their chemical structure, pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, and specific dosages.

Dependent Claims

  • Narrower claims that depend on independent claims, adding specific details, such as specific chemical modifications, formulation parameters, or administration routes.

Comparative Novelty and Inventive Step

The claims must demonstrate novelty over prior art, including existing patents, scientific literature, or known formulations. The inventive step must be non-obvious to a person skilled in the field.

Assuming the claims cover a novel compound or combination with unexpected therapeutic benefits, this enhances patent strength.

Claim Language and Limitations

  • Precise language increases enforceability and reduces scope ambiguity.
  • Use of terms like "comprising," "consisting of," or "including" influences claim scope—"comprising" allows additional elements, thus broadening protection.

Scope Highlights

Given typical pharmaceutical patents, it's probable that:

  • The patent claims a specific chemical entity or salts thereof with unique substituents.
  • It covers a formulation with particular excipients or delivery systems.
  • It claims a therapeutic method for a specific disease (e.g., oncology, neurology).

Patent Landscape and Competitive Positioning

To contextualize CY1120663 within the patent landscape:

Prior Art and Related Patents

  • The patent landscape for pharmaceuticals often involves numerous patents covering analogous compounds, formulations, or methods.
  • Key references include previous patents on similar chemical classes or therapeutic uses, which may be cited or cited by the patent.

Patent Families and Geographic Reach

  • It’s essential to examine whether CY1120663 is part of a broader patent family filed across jurisdictions such as EP (European Patent Office), PCT, or specific countries.
  • Broader territorial coverage enhances market exclusivity, affecting licensing or commercialization strategies.

Potential Limitations and Risks

  • Overly broad claims risk invalidation if challenged for lack of inventive step or novelty.
  • Narrow claims diminish market scope but are easier to defend.

Legal Status and Enforcement

  • Confirm if the patent is granted, pending, or expired.
  • Enforcement depends on the patent’s validity, perceived infringement, and market value.

Competitive Strategies

  • Patent holders might pursue supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) or supplementary patents on improved formulations.
  • Litigation or licensing efforts hinge on claim strength and landscape density.

Summary

CY1120663 appears to protect a specific pharmaceutical compound or formulation with therapeutic applications. Its claims likely encompass the active ingredient, its formulation, and potentially method claims, with carefully crafted language balancing broad protection and robustness against legal challenges.

The patent landscape indicates a competitive environment with multiple overlapping patents, requiring strategic positioning and continuous monitoring for invalidation threats or licensing opportunities. The scope’s strength depends on claim specificity, prior art cited, and the patent’s legal status.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Clarity and Breadth: Clear, well-drafted claims that balance breadth and defensibility are critical to maximizing patent value in the pharmaceutical landscape.
  • Strategic Patent Positioning: Securing broad claims covering the active compound and uses enhances market exclusivity, but risks prior art challenges. Narrow claims can provide defensible protection for specific embodiments.
  • Patent Family Expansion: Extending patent protection across jurisdictions fortifies market position and deters infringement.
  • Innovation and Patent Synergy: Combining patent rights with regulatory exclusivity and lifecycle management strategies elevates commercial potential.
  • Ongoing Landscape Monitoring: Vigilant tracking of peer patents and scientific literature safeguards against infringement risks and identifies licensing opportunities.

FAQs

1. What are the typical elements of patent claims in pharmaceutical patents like CY1120663?
Claims generally define the scope concerning the active compound, formulation, use, and manufacturing process. They are precisely worded to delineate inventive features and prevent easy workarounds.

2. How does claim scope influence enforcement and licensing?
Broader claims provide wider protection but can be vulnerable to invalidation. Narrow claims are easier to defend but limit market exclusivity. Effective licensing strategies depend on a balanced scope.

3. Why is the patent landscape important for pharmaceutical innovations?
It helps assess patent infringement risks, identify gaps for innovation, and formulate licensing or litigation strategies. Understanding the landscape ensures strategic positioning and maximizes value.

4. What role does patent family expansion play in patent strategy?
Patents filed across multiple jurisdictions via patent families extend protection, prevent territorial infringement, and enhance bargaining power with competitors.

5. How can stakeholders use this patent analysis for commercial decision-making?
By understanding patent scope and landscape, stakeholders can evaluate freedom-to-operate, identify licensing opportunities, develop surrounding patent portfolios, and plan lifecycle management.


References

  1. European Patent Office. (2022). Patent searching and analysis resources.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Patent information and patent landscaping tools.
  3. Patentscope. (2022). Patent search database for prior art and patent families.
  4. M. R. McConnell, "Pharmaceutical patent law and practice," Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2020.
  5. European Patent Office. (2022). Guidelines for Examination in the European Patent Office.

Note: This analysis is based on typical patent structures within the pharmaceutical sector and general principles of patent law applicable within Cyprus and Europe. For detailed legal advice or in-depth patent claims analysis, consultation with a patent attorney is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.