You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Cyprus Patent: 1118179


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Cyprus Patent: 1118179

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,821,927 Sep 18, 2029 Novartis TYKERB lapatinib ditosylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Cyprus Patent CY1118179

Last updated: August 2, 2025

Introduction

Cyprus Patent CY1118179 pertains to a specific intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical domain. Its scope, claims, and surrounding patent landscape provide critical insights into its strategic value, potential for innovation protection, and competitive positioning. This analysis dissects the patent’s claims methodology, its legal scope, and the broader patent ecosystem in which it resides, offering actionable intelligence for stakeholders.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

Cyprus patent CY1118179 was filed with the Cyprus Patent Office, aligning with the jurisdiction’s efforts to bolster local and regional patent protection. The patent aims to safeguard a novel pharmaceutical invention—likely related to a drug, formulation, or a method of manufacturing—although specific claims are necessary to confirm precise technical coverage.

Its legal lifetime, current status, and priority date impact its enforceability and commercialization window. The patent’s filing date, examination reports, and any subsequent amendments shape its scope and durability.


Scope of the Patent and Claim Structure

Claims Composition

Patent claims define the boundaries of legal protection. For CY1118179, the typical composition comprises:

  • Independent Claims: Broader claims capturing the core inventive concept—likely encompassing a novel compound, formulation, or method.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower features adding specific embodiments, such as particular chemical compositions, dosing regimens, or manufacturing conditions.

Based on standard pharmaceutical patent strategies, the claims probably encompass:

  • Chemical Entities: Specific active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), their derivatives, or salts.
  • Formulations: Dosage forms such as tablets, injectables, or sustained-release systems.
  • Methodologies: Processes for synthesis, purification, or delivery.

Scope Analysis

Given the typical pharmaceutical patent scope, CY1118179’s claims likely aim to extend coverage over:

  • Novelty: Protecting unique molecules or formulations not disclosed previously.
  • Inventive Step: Demonstrating an unexpected efficacy or improved safety profile.
  • Industrial Applicability: Emphasizing utility for treatment indications, manufacturing, or stability.

The breadth of the independent claims determines exclusivity. For example, a broad chemical composition claim may block competitors from developing similar compounds, while narrow process claims might limit enforcement.


Claim Analysis: Strengths and Limitations

Strengths

  • Compound-specific Claims: If well-angled, these can secure exclusive rights over the core chemical entity.
  • Use Claims: Protect specific therapeutic applications, increasing the patent’s life span despite evolving formulations.
  • Manufacturing Claims: Cover synthesis and purification processes, deterring generic replication.

Limitations

  • Scope Narrowness: Overly specific claims risk design-around by minor modifications.
  • Prior Art: If similar compounds or formulations exist, the patent’s novelty could be contested.
  • Claim Dependence: Heavy reliance on dependent claims reduces enforceability if foundational claims are invalidated.

Legal challenges, such as claims interpretation and patent validity, depend on thorough prior art searches and patent office examination reports.


Patent Landscape Context

Regional Patent Environment

Cyprus, as a member of the European Patent Organisation, aligns its patent laws closely with European standards. Therefore, CY1118179’s scope intersects with regional patent landscapes, especially where patents of similar scope are filed in Europe, or elsewhere.

Other jurisdictions might have filed corresponding patents, either directly or via Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications. The landscape includes:

  • European Patent Applications: Covering the same invention with broader or narrower claims.
  • United States and Asian Patents: Providing diversification for market presence.
  • Other National Protections: In jurisdictions like Israel, where regional cooperation exists.

Competitive Patent Activity

The pharmaceutical patent space around CY1118179 features:

  • Existing patents for similar compounds or mechanisms of action (e.g., in databases like Espacenet or WIPO).
  • Secondary patents or patent applications claiming formulations, use methods, or improvements.
  • Patent litigations or oppositions: Indicating market challenges and enforcement efforts.

Freedom-to-Operate and Infringement Risks

Stakeholders must analyze whether existing patents block commercialization or research. Overlaps in chemical space or therapeutic indications could create infringement risks, emphasizing the importance of a detailed patent landscape analysis.


Legal and Commercial Implications

Patent Validity Considerations

  • Novelty and Non-Obviousness: The patent’s claims must not have been disclosed publicly or be obvious over prior art.
  • Supporting Disclosure: Clear and enabling description ensures enforceability.
  • Patent Lifecycle: Timelines influence R&D, licensing, or marketing strategies.

Commercialization and Licensing

  • Exclusive rights facilitate licensing or partnerships.
  • Potential for Generic Challenges: Patent expiry, opposition, or invalidation efforts could erode protection.

International Strategy

Acceptance of the patent for regional markets depends on compliance with regional patent laws, clinical trials, and regulatory approvals.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Breadth Determines Protection: Broad independent claims, carefully drafted, are vital for robust exclusivity.
  • Patent Landscape Requires Ongoing Mapping: Continuous monitoring of similar patents can prevent infringement and identify licensing opportunities.
  • Legal Robustness is Paramount: Adequate disclosure, clear claim language, and strategic claim dependence bolster enforceability.
  • Jurisdictional Expansion: Securing patents in major markets enhances commercial prospects.
  • Proactive Defense: Vigilant opposition and infringement enforcement are essential for maintaining patent value.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of the claims in Cyprus patent CY1118179?
The claims define the scope of legal protection, determining what the patent owner exclusively controls, including specific compounds, formulations, or methods. Well-crafted claims ensure strong enforceability and market exclusivity.

2. How does the patent landscape influence the potential for CY1118179’s commercial success?
A thorough landscape analysis reveals overlapping patents or prior art that could block or threaten the patent’s enforceability. Understanding competing rights guides licensing, development, and commercialization strategies.

3. Can the patent claims be challenged or invalidated?
Yes. Claims are subject to invalidation if prior art disclosures or obviousness considerations are established through patent office proceedings or litigation.

4. How does regional patent law impact CY1118179’s protection?
Cyprus’s patent laws align with European standards, which influence how claims are examined and enforced. International protections depend on filing strategies, including PCT routes and regional patents.

5. What steps should stakeholders take to maximize the patent’s value?
Stakeholders should monitor patent validity, enforce rights proactively, consider extending geographical coverage, and develop alternative formulations or methods to circumvent or reinforce the patent.


References

  1. European Patent Office. (2022). European Patent Convention.
  2. WIPO. (2023). International Patent Classification.
  3. Espacenet Patent Database. (2023). Patent Search and Landscape Analysis.
  4. Cyprus Patent Office. (2023). Guidelines for Patent Examination.
  5. Patent Landscape Reports for Pharmaceuticals. (2022). Global Patent Trends.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.