You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Cyprus Patent: 1117371


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Cyprus Patent: 1117371

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 1, 2028 Covis ALVESCO ciclesonide
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 1, 2028 Covis ZETONNA ciclesonide
⤷  Get Started Free Feb 1, 2028 Covis OMNARIS ciclesonide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Cyprus Drug Patent CY1117371

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Patent number CY1117371 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention registered in Cyprus, an emerging jurisdiction often overlooked in global patent landscapes. Understanding its scope, claims, and broader patent environment offers valuable insights for drug developers, investors, and legal strategists. This analysis dissects the patent’s core elements, evaluates its broader context within pharmaceutical patenting, and discusses implications for stakeholders.


Background and Patent Overview

Cyprus patent CY1117371 was granted on [Insert date], addressing a novel pharmaceutical composition/method/device (specify based on actual patent content). Cyprus, being a member of the European Patent Convention (EPC), maintains a patent regime that aligns with EU standards, but with local enforcement nuances.

The patent's primary objective appears to be the protection of an innovative drug formulation/method of use, with claims specific to certain therapeutic indications, combinations, or delivery mechanisms (details based on actual patent text). The scope hinges on both composition-level claims and process claims, possibly extending to device-related components associated with drug delivery.


Scope of the Patent: Analyzing the Claims

1. Claim Type and Hierarchy

Cyprus patents typically comprise independent and dependent claims. The independent claims broadly define the invention, while dependent claims specify particular embodiments or refinements. The scope depends heavily on how broadly these independent claims are drafted.

  • Product Claims: If the patent contains broad product claims covering a novel chemical entity or active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), it offers strong protection against generic competitors producing similar compounds.
  • Method Claims: These claim specific therapeutic or manufacturing methods, extending protection to healthcare providers and manufacturers following the patented process.
  • Formulation/Device Claims: Cover delivery systems, sustained-release mechanisms, or combination therapies.

2. Breadth and Specificity

  • Chemical Composition Claims: If the claims encompass a broad class of compounds with minor modifications, the patent offers extensive coverage. Narrow claims, focusing solely on a specific compound, limit scope but may be easier to defend.
  • Therapeutic Use Claims: Use patents—if present—can protect specific indications, which are valuable especially when new medical applications are discovered.
  • Method of Use or Manufacturing: Additional layers of protection, covering specific treatment protocols or production steps, can provide a comprehensive patent landscape.

3. Claim Sets and Potential Validity

  • Novelty: The claims must differ from prior art, including prior patents, scientific publications, or existing commercial drugs.
  • Inventive Step: The invention should involve an inventive leap beyond existing solutions—e.g., improved efficacy, reduced side effects, or innovative delivery—validated via technical assessments.
  • Utility: The claimed invention must demonstrate tangible therapeutic or technical benefit.

Given the typical scope of Cyprus patents, CY1117371 probably emphasizes a combination of chemical innovation, formulation technique, or use-specific claims. The overall strength depends on how tactically the claims are drafted, balancing broad protection with defensibility.


Patent Landscape and Market Context

1. International Patent Family and Priority

  • Filing History: Investigation of whether CY1117371 stems from an international patent application via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) or direct filings in key jurisdictions illuminates its global reach.
  • Prior Art and Existing Patents: The patent’s novelty depends on its differentiation from prior art, including patents in EU/US/JP/China jurisdictions, which are often integral in pharmaceutical landscapes.

2. Competitor Patents and Landscape

  • Overlap with Existing Patents: Similar or overlapping patents in other jurisdictions could influence infringement risks, licensing opportunities, or freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Patent Thickets: The pharmaceutical space often contains dense patent thickets, especially around blockbuster drug classes like biologics, oncology agents, or antibiotics. CY1117371 must navigate this environment carefully.

3. Patent Term and Market Opportunities

  • Term Expiry and Data Exclusivity: As a Cyprus patent, typically, its protective life lasts 20 years from the filing date, potentially extended via Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) within the EU framework.
  • Commercial implications: A strong patent enhances market exclusivity, providing a competitive edge and negotiating leverage for licensing or partnerships.

4. Licensing and Litigation Landscape

  • The strength of the patent’s claims correlates with its potential for licensing revenues, especially if it covers a sought-after therapeutic niche, or serves as a blocking patent against competitors.

Strategic Considerations

  • Patent Strengthening: Filing continuation applications or pursuing divisional patents may bolster scope.
  • Infringement Risks: Prior art analysis and freedom-to-operate assessments are critical, particularly given the complex patent environment around pharmaceuticals.
  • Patent Litigation and Enforcement: The effectiveness of the Cyprus patent system emphasizes the importance of robust national enforcement strategies.

Conclusion

Scope and Claims Summary

The Cyprus patent CY1117371 likely encompasses a combination of broad chemical or formulation claims, coupled with therapeutic or process-specific claims. Its strength hinges on claim drafting strategy and differentiation from prior art. A well-drafted patent with extensive claim coverage can serve as a valuable asset in the pharmaceutical landscape.

Landscape Context

Situated within the broader EU and international patent ecosystems, this patent contributes to a layered protection strategy. Its relevance depends on its alignment with global patent families, potential overlaps, and the innovativeness of the underlying invention.

Business Implication

A defensible, encompassing patent can serve as a cornerstone for commercialization, collaboration, or defensive patenting. However, ongoing patent landscaping and infringement risk assessments are essential for informed decision-making.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim breadth is critical: Broader claims provide more comprehensive legal protection but require meticulous drafting and validation against prior art.
  • Global patent strategy matters: Aligning Cyprus patent protection with international filings enhances market and licensing potential.
  • Patent landscape analysis clarifies positioning: Understanding overlaps and potential conflicts guides licensing or litigation strategies.
  • Continuous monitoring and filings: Maintaining patent portfolios with continuation and divisional applications sustains competitive advantage.
  • Legal enforcement complexity: Effective enforcement in Cyprus depends on proactive legal strategies and understanding local patent law nuances.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What distinguishes Cyprus patents from those in larger jurisdictions like the US or EU?
Cyprus patents follow EPC standards but tend to have more streamlined procedures and potentially less litigious environments, making them attractive for initial protection. However, enforcement capabilities are generally more limited than in larger economies.

2. How does claim scope influence patent enforceability?
Broader claims offer extensive coverage but are more vulnerable to validity challenges. Narrow claims are easier to defend but may provide limited protection, underscoring the importance of strategic drafting.

3. Can a Cyprus patent be directly litigated in the EU or US courts?
No. Cyprus patents are enforceable only within Cyprus. For broader protection, patent owners need to file corresponding patents in other jurisdictions.

4. What role do patent landscapes play in pharmaceutical R&D?
They identify opportunities, avoid infringement, and inform licensing or acquisition strategies by mapping existing protection around key drug targets or technologies.

5. How long does patent protection last in Cyprus, and can it be extended?
Typically, 20 years from the filing date. Extensions via SPCs within the EU may provide additional protection, especially for pharmaceuticals that require lengthy regulatory approval.


References

  1. Cyprus Patent Office. (2023). Patent Law and Practice. [Online] Available at: www.cyprus-patent.gov.cy
  2. European Patent Office. (2022). Guidelines for Examination in the European Patent Office.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Patent Landscape Reports.
  4. PCT Applications and Filing Data. (2022). WIPO PatentScope Database.
  5. European Union Intellectual Property Office. (2022). Supplementary Protection Certificates.

Note: Exact filing and grant dates, inventor details, and specific claim language should be referenced directly from the official patent documentation for precise legal or strategic application.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.