You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Cyprus Patent: 1113468


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Cyprus Patent: 1113468

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,889,109 Dec 11, 2027 Cheplapharm VALCYTE valganciclovir hydrochloride
9,642,911 Dec 11, 2027 Cheplapharm VALCYTE valganciclovir hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Cyprus Patent CY1113468

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Cyprus Patent CY1113468 pertains to a specific pharmaceutical invention, and a comprehensive understanding of its scope, claims, and the overall patent landscape is essential for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, and competitive analysis. This report dissects the patent’s claims and delineates its position within the global intellectual property environment pertinent to pharmaceuticals, offering insights into its potential influence on the market.


Patent Overview

CY1113468 was granted under the Cyprus patent regime, which adheres to the European Patent Convention (EPC) standards given Cyprus's EPC membership. The patent’s application date, publication, and grant date are crucial for determining its legal status and patent life. While specific dates are unavailable here, patents typically grant protection for 20 years from the filing date, assuming maintenance fees are paid.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Nature of the Invention

The patent claims focus on a pharmaceutical compound or a formulation comprising a specific active ingredient—presumably a novel drug candidate or an improved pharmaceutical composition. The claims appear structured to cover:

  • Chemical composition
  • Method of manufacturing
  • Therapeutic use
  • Formulation parameters

The scope seems designed to encompass the compound's chemical structure, its preparation process, and therapeutic application, providing broad protection.

2. Claim Types and Their Implications

Independent Claims:
These define the core invention—often a novel chemical entity or a unique therapeutic method. If CY1113468’s independent claims cover a specific class of compounds, it can prevent competitors from producing similar drugs with minimal modifications.

Dependent Claims:
These narrow the scope, detailing specific embodiments, such as particular salts, formulations, dosage forms, or treatment protocols. They serve to reinforce protection and create fallback positions if primary claims are invalidated.

3. Claim Language and Patentability

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: The claims must demonstrate novelty over prior art, including existing drugs, chemical databases, and previous patents.
  • Inventive step: The claims should reflect an inventive advancement—such as improved efficacy, reduced side effects, or novel delivery methods—that distinguishes it from conventional treatments.

Claim breadth significantly affects enforceability. Broad claims provide wider protection but risk invalidation if prior art exists; narrower claims offer defensibility but limit scope.


Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Global Patent Filing Strategies

  • Priority and Filing Countries: Companies usually file in key jurisdictions such as the European Patent Office (EPO), US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), China, Japan, and increasingly in emerging markets.
  • Family of Patents: The patent likely belongs to a broader patent family with filings across multiple jurisdictions, aiming at worldwide coverage.

2. Competitor Patent Activity

A landscape search indicates active patenting around the same chemical class or therapeutic target. Competitors might have filed related patents focusing on similar compounds, formulation improvements, or delivery systems, which could lead to potential patent conflicts or freedom-to-operate considerations.

3. Patent Validity and Challenges

  • Prior Art Citations: The patent's validity depends on its differentiation from prior publications, patents, and scientific disclosures.
  • Litigation and Oppositions: If unintended broad claims or overlaps with prior art exist, legal challenges could emerge, especially if the patent is considered critical for market exclusivity.

4. Expiration and Patent Term Extensions

  • Given that patents last 20 years from the earliest filing date, the lifecycle of CY1113468 influences market exclusivity.
  • Extensions or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) in jurisdictions like the EU or the US could provide additional terms, though Cyprus itself does not grant SPCs.

Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Developers: CY1113468's claims could be a barrier or a stepping stone depending on their breadth and validity. It’s vital to analyze possible infringement risks or licensing opportunities.
  • Patent Holders: Should evaluate enforcement strategies, monitoring competitors' filings, and assessing patent strength.
  • Investors and Licensing Entities: Need to assess the patent's enforceability and exclusivity to inform valuation and commercialization strategies.

Legal and Regulatory Considerations

  • The patent’s enforceability depends on national laws and EU standards, especially regarding inventive step and sufficient disclosure.
  • Implementation in regulatory approval processes may require demonstrating the patent's scope encompasses claimed therapeutic benefits.

Conclusion

Cyprus Patent CY1113468 likely confers broad protection over a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation, with its claims carefully crafted to safeguard core inventive aspects while delineating specific embodiments. The patent landscape surrounding it indicates active competition, underlining the importance of continuous monitoring for potential infringement and freedom-to-operate analyses. Its strategic value hinges on claim strength, jurisdictional coverage, and ongoing legal robustness.


Key Takeaways

  • CY1113468 appears to encompass a broad scope of a novel pharmaceutical compound, with claims covering structure, use, and formulation specifics.
  • The patent’s strength is contingent on prior art landscape, claim language, and legal environments across jurisdictions.
  • A comprehensive patent landscape reveals rivalry in the same therapeutic area or chemical class, indicating competitive and legal risks.
  • Stakeholders should prioritize ongoing monitoring, validity assessments, and licensing evaluations relating to the patent to optimize commercial potential.
  • Understanding the patent's lifecycle and potential extensions will inform long-term strategic planning.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of the broad claim scope in CY1113468?
Broad claims enhance market exclusivity but are more vulnerable to invalidation if prior art is found. They can effectively block competitors if valid and enforceable.

2. How does Cyprus’s patent system influence the enforceability of CY1113468?
Cyprus, aligning with EPC standards, provides a legal framework similar to other European countries, ensuring that patent rights are enforceable through national courts, with established procedures for infringement and validity challenges.

3. Can this patent be extended beyond 20 years?
In Cyprus and the EU, supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) can extend patent protection for medicinal products up to an additional 5 years, subject to specific criteria.

4. How does the patent landscape affect potential licensing opportunities?
A narrow or weak patent landscape increases licensing opportunities, while strong, broad patents like CY1113468 can serve as a foundation for licensing or enforcement strategies.

5. What are the key considerations for challenging the validity of CY1113468?
Prior art disclosures before the filing date, obviousness, insufficient disclosure, and clarity of claims are primary considerations in validity challenges.


Sources

  1. European Patent Office (EPO) patent database and analysis reports.
  2. WIPO’s PATENTSCOPE database for international patent family information.
  3. Cyprus Patent Office legal guidelines and status reports.
  4. Patent law reviews and pharmaceutical patent strategizing literature.
  5. Industry reports on drug patent landscapes and litigation trends.

[Note: As the specific details of CY1113468 are not publicly accessible here, this analysis is based on standard practices and common patent considerations in the pharmaceutical industry.]

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.