You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Profile for Cyprus Patent: 1112222


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Cyprus Patent: 1112222

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,932,273 Mar 7, 2026 Boehringer Ingelheim PRADAXA dabigatran etexilate mesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope and Claims and Patent Landscape for Cyprus Drug Patent CY1112222

Last updated: August 1, 2025


Introduction

The pharmaceutical patent landscape is complex, heavily regulated, and characterized by a strategic interplay of technical scope, legal protections, and market exclusivities. This analysis focuses on Cyprus patent CY1112222, evaluating its scope and claims, and mapping its position within the broader patent landscape. Understanding this patent’s specificities provides critical insights for stakeholders including pharmaceutical developers, investors, and legal professionals seeking to navigate the intellectual property environment in Cyprus and beyond.


Patent Overview and Basic Data

Cyprus patent CY1112222 was granted on [insert grant date] by the Cyprus Patent Office, offering protection in the Republic of Cyprus. While Cyprus is not a major pharmaceutical manufacturing hub, it is a member of the European Patent Organisation, allowing patent families to extend protections into the European Patent System.

This patent relates to a specific drug compound, formulation, or method of treatment, possibly building on prior art or novel innovative steps as per the claims. The scope of the patent and its enforceability depend heavily on the clarity, breadth, and novelty of its claims.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Structure of the Patent Claims

The core of the patent’s enforceable scope resides in its claims—legal boundaries that define the invention. Patent CY1112222 appears to contain:

  • Independent Claims: These set out the broadest aspects of the invention, potentially encompassing a novel chemical entity or formulation.
  • Dependent Claims: These narrow the scope, detailing specific embodiments, dosages, formulations, or methods.

2. Nature of the Claims

a. Composition Claims:
Claims likely cover the chemical structure of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). These claims specify molecular formulas, stereochemistry, or salts thereof, providing protection against generic equivalents with minor modifications.

b. Formulation Claims:
Claims may extend to specific formulations—e.g., sustained-release matrices, fixed-dose combinations, or bioavailable preparations—that improve drug efficacy or stability.

c. Method Claims:
Patent protection might include method-of-use claims, covering novel indications or treatment protocols, which are crucial for extending life cycle and market exclusivity.

d. Manufacturing Claims:
Claims could also encompass manufacturing processes that provide technical advantages or better yields, aiding in defending against competitors.

3. Claim Scope and Breadth

The breadth of claims in CY1112222 directly influences its enforceability:

  • Broad Claims:
    If the independent claims articulate a general structure or broad class of compounds, they offer extensive protection but risk invalidation if prior art indicates obviousness or lack of novelty.

  • Narrow Claims:
    More specific claims, such as particular substituents or dosage ranges, might provide more defensibility but limit market scope.

The balance between broad and narrow claims is optimized to maximize market exclusivity while maintaining validity.

4. Novelty and Inventive Step

The patent claims must demonstrate novelty over prior art, including existing drugs, patents, or scientific literature. The inventive step (non-obviousness) hinges on features such as unique stereochemistry, improved bioavailability, or a novel manufacturing process.

Given current patent standards, CY1112222’s claims likely focus on differentiating features that address unmet medical needs or demonstrate unexpected therapeutic benefits.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Related Patents and Patent Families

The patent landscape surrounding CY1112222 includes:

  • Prior Art Search:
    Existing patents on similar compounds, formulations, or methods from major players like Pfizer, Novartis, or local innovator companies, creating a crowded patent space.

  • Family Members:
    The patent may belong to an international family, with equivalents in Europe (EPC), PCT applications, or national patents covering other jurisdictions.

2. Competitive and Collaborative Landscape

The patent’s position within the enlarged patent ecosystem includes:

  • Blocking Patents:
    Existing patents covering core chemical frameworks or formulations, requiring navigate-around strategies or licensing negotiations.

  • Complementary Patents:
    Patents covering combination therapies, delivery devices, or diagnostics that complement CY1112222's claims.

3. Patent Term and Market Exclusivity

In Cyprus, patents generally provide 20 years from filing, with potential extensions via supplementary protections or data exclusivity. The timing of CY1112222’s filing governs its remaining enforceable life, which correlates with strategic drug development timelines.


Legal and Commercial Implications

The breadth and specificity of CY1112222’s claims influence its commercial value:

  • Enforceability:
    Vigorous prosecution and well-drafted claims provide a strong legal shield against infringers.

  • Freedom to Operate (FTO):
    Stakeholders must analyze existing patents to avoid infringement, especially given the crowded landscape of chemical and formulation patents.

  • Infringement Risks:
    Claims that are too broad may face invalidation, while overly narrow claims risk easy circumvention.


Conclusion

Cyprus patent CY1112222 likely embodies a strategic balance of broad composition claims and narrower method or formulation claims. Its scope, shaped by novelty and inventive step, influences its market exclusivity and legal strength. The surrounding patent landscape, characterized by overlapping patents and prior art, necessitates careful FTO analysis.

At a strategic level, stakeholders should monitor:

  • Potential patent challengers or invalidation risks in the European and international contexts.
  • Opportunities for licensing or collaboration with patent holders.
  • The positioning of this patent within existing patent clusters to optimize market entry.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope precision is critical: Carefully crafted independent claims define the patent’s breadth, balancing broad protection with validity.
  • Patent landscape complexity: The crowded field necessitates detailed patent clearance searches to avoid infringement.
  • Strategic lifecycle management: Consider patent term timelines, potential extensions, and complementary patents to maximize market exclusivity.
  • Innovation differentiation: Claims focusing on novel compounds, formulations, or methods improve enforceability and market advantage.
  • Legal robustness: Strong, well-drafted claims backed by solid inventive step arguments strengthen patent enforceability and licensing opportunities.

FAQs

Q1: How can I determine whether CY1112222 covers a specific drug molecule or formulation?
A1: Review the patent’s claims document—particularly the independent claims specifying chemical structures or formulations. Legal counsel or patent experts can interpret claim language relative to your compound.

Q2: What are the risks of patent invalidation for CY1112222?
A2: Obviousness over prior art, lack of novelty, or insufficient disclosure can challenge validity. Conducting comprehensive prior art searches and legal analyses is essential.

Q3: How does patent scope influence licensing negotiations?
A3: Broader claims typically command higher licensing fees but are harder to defend. Narrow claims limit the scope but may be more defensible legally.

Q4: What strategic advantages does patent protection in Cyprus provide?
A4: Cyprus’s membership in the European Patent Organisation facilitates expansion into wider European markets through future filings and validations, extending protection beyond Cyprus.

Q5: Can modifications to a drug circumvent CY1112222?
A5: Potentially, if modifications fall outside the patent claims’ scope, such as different chemical structures or formulations. Close legal review of claims determines clear boundaries.


Sources

  1. European Patent Office. "Patent Search Strategies." [1]
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. "Patent Law and Practice." [2]
  3. Cyprus Patent Office. "Patent Examination Guidelines." [3]
  4. GlobalData Pharma Intelligence. "Patent Landscapes in the Pharmaceutical Sector." [4]
  5. PatentScope. "Chemical and Pharmaceutical Patent Data." [5]

Note: The above analysis assumes typical patent strategies and standard claim structures based on known pharmaceutical patent practices. For a precise assessment, access to patent documents, prosecution history, and technical disclosures is essential.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.