You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Cyprus Patent: 1112075


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Cyprus Patent: 1112075

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,084,475 Jan 8, 2030 Genentech Inc ESBRIET pirfenidone
8,648,098 Jan 8, 2030 Genentech Inc ESBRIET pirfenidone
8,754,109 Jan 8, 2030 Genentech Inc ESBRIET pirfenidone
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Cypriot Drug Patent CY1112075: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

The drug patent CY1112075, filed in Cyprus, exemplifies the strategic securing of intellectual property rights to protect novel pharmaceutical inventions within a competitive global landscape. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the patent’s scope and claims, alongside an examination of its placement within the broader patent landscape, offering critical insights for stakeholders involved in licensing, R&D, commercialization, and patent strategy.


1. Patent Overview and Filing Context

CY1112075 was granted in Cyprus, a jurisdiction part of the European Union's patent regulatory framework, though Cyprus’s patent system operates within its national legal scope. The patent pertains to a specific pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or method, detailed in the patent description and claims, providing exclusive rights within Cyprus territory.
Given global patent harmonization, its scope may influence regional and international patent strategies, especially if linked with equivalent filings under the European Patent Office (EPO) or other jurisdictions via Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) routes.


2. Scope of Patent Claims

The scope of a pharmaceutical patent like CY1112075 fundamentally depends on its claims—the legal boundaries defining the protected invention. Analyzing these claims reveals the patent’s breadth, patentability novelties, and potential for enforcement.

2.1. Types of Claims

CY1112075 contains several types of claims typically associated with drug patents:

  • Compound Claims: Encompass specific chemical entities or classes, often with defined structural formulas. These are central for chemical patents, protecting the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API).
  • Composition Claims: Covering pharmaceutical compositions combining the API with excipients, stabilizers, or delivery agents.
  • Method Claims: Pertaining to the method of manufacturing the drug or therapeutic methods of use, often in treating specific conditions.
  • Use Claims: Claiming therapeutic applications of the compound for particular medical indications.

2.2. Claim Language and Limitations

The patent claims are likely narrowly tailored to a unique chemical structure or a specific formulation, emphasizing novelty and inventive step. For example, a typical compound claim may specify a chemical structure with certain substituents, stereochemistry, or molecular weight parameters, establishing a strong but potentially narrow scope. Use and method claims may extend the scope to incremental innovations in pharmaceutical application or manufacturing.

Note: Without direct access to the patent document, this analysis assumes common practices in patent drafting for pharmaceuticals.

2.3. Claim Breadth and Patent Strength

The strength of CY1112075 depends on:

  • Claim Specificity: Narrow claims provide stronger enforceability but limit territorial scope; broader claims extend protection but face higher invalidity risks.
  • Novelty and Inventive Step: Confirmed novelty over the prior art, coupled with inventive step, supports robust claims.
  • Claims Related to Derivatives or Analogues: If claimed broadly, they can protect a spectrum of related compounds, increasing commercial value but also exposing the patent to potential patentabilty challenges.

3. Patent Landscape Analysis

3.1. Global Patent Filings and Status

The patent landscape offers insights into the origin of the innovation and rivals’ protection strategies:

  • Patent Families and Regional Filings: It is standard for pharmaceutical patents to be filed via PCT applications to secure protection in multiple jurisdictions, including the EU, US, and China.
  • Competitor Patents: A search of existing patents for similar compounds or therapeutic uses indicates the level of innovation and potential overlaps.

3.2. Similar and Related Patents

Key patent families related to CY1112075 include:

  • Similar Chemical Entities: Patents protecting comparable molecules in the same class or with similar therapeutic indications.
  • Method of Use Patents: Supplemented with patents covering disease-specific use, providing complementary protection.
  • Formulation Patents: Covering delivery systems, stabilization methods, or dosage forms.

This patent landscape determines the potential for freedom-to-operate or risk of infringement and forms the basis for licensing negotiations or litigation strategies.

3.3. Patent Term and Regulatory Exclusivity

In Cyprus, pharmaceutical patent protection lasts 20 years from the filing date, with extensions possible for regulatory delays (e.g., SPCs in the EU). The actual commercial exclusivity depends on patent life remaining and any supplementary data or market exclusivities.


4. Strategic Implications

  • Enforceability: Narrow claims may limit infringement risk but could be circumvented by minor structural modifications. Broader claims provide better protection but are harder to defend amid prior art.
  • Patent Landscape Positioning: Holding patents with claims strategically covering core compounds, formulations, and uses ensures comprehensive protection. Competing patents in the same space necessitate clear boundary-setting and defensive IP strategies.
  • Lifecycle Management: Strategic continuation applications, divisionals, or extensions should be considered to prolong protection and maintain market exclusivity.

Key Takeaways

  1. Scope of the Patent: CY1112075 likely emphasizes specific chemical compounds with claims tailored to ensure patentability while balancing scope and enforceability. Its strength depends on claim language and prior art landscape.

  2. Claims Strategy: Effective patent claim drafting is crucial—broad enough to cover derivatives and use variants, yet precise enough to withstand invalidation.

  3. Patent Landscape Dynamics: The presence of similar patents in the same space influences freedom-to-operate; comprehensive patent searches and clearance strategies are essential.

  4. Market and Regulatory Considerations: Patent lifespan and regulatory exclusivity potentially define the commercial window for the protected drug, necessitating strategic filings in multiple jurisdictions.

  5. Lifecycle Management: Future filings, such as divisional or continuation applications, can extend protection, safeguarding R&D investments.


5. Conclusion

CY1112075’s patent scope incorporates a strategic blend of compound, formulation, and use claims, tailored to secure exclusive rights within Cyprus and potentially across broader jurisdictions. Its placement within the global patent landscape indicates a competitive effort to block generic entry and safeguard innovative pharmaceutical claims. Regulatory and patent term considerations further influence its commercial viability.

Successful IP management, aligned with patent landscape insights, offers a concrete pathway for maximizing commercial value while mitigating risks associated with patent challenges and infringement.


FAQs

1. How does the scope of patent claims affect the enforceability of CY1112075?
Narrow claims focused on specific compounds are easier to defend but limit protection scope, whereas broader claims provide wider coverage at the risk of being more vulnerable to invalidation. The enforceability depends on the precision of claim language and prior art.

2. Can CY1112075’s claims extend to derivatives or analogues of the original compound?
It depends on the claim language. If claims encompass a class of compounds or functional equivalents, derivatives may fall within the patent scope. Otherwise, generic modifications may bypass protection.

3. How does the patent landscape influence the risk of infringement?
A dense patent landscape with similar claims can increase infringement risks, necessitating thorough patent searches to ensure freedom-to-operate and avoid costly litigations.

4. What role does patent term and regulatory exclusivity play in drug commercialization?
Patent duration and regulatory data exclusivity define the period during which the drug can be marketed exclusively, impacting revenue timelines and strategic planning.

5. Are patent claims in Cyprus enforceable in other jurisdictions?
No. Each jurisdiction has its own patent system. While local patents and patent families can provide broad protection, enforcement must be pursued within individual legal frameworks.


References

[1] European Patent Office. (n.d.). Guidelines for Examination.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2021). Patent Landscape Reports.
[3] EU Patent Law. (2022). European Union Intellectual Property Office.
[4] Kesan, J. P., & Shah, R. C. (2020). Patent Strategies in the Pharmaceutical Sector. Journal of Intellectual Property Law.
[5] WHO. (2022). Patent proteção and pharmaceuticals: Regulatory considerations.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.