You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 1, 2026

Profile for Cyprus Patent: 1107045


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Cyprus Patent: 1107045

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Start Trial Apr 30, 2026 Organon ZETIA ezetimibe
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Cyprus Drug Patent CY1107045

Last updated: August 7, 2025

Introduction

Cyprus Patent CY1107045 pertains to a proprietary pharmaceutical invention, with specific scope and claims that define its intellectual property protection. Understanding its claim language, technological scope, and the broader patent landscape is essential for stakeholders involved in licensing, manufacturing, or legal assessment. This analysis delineates the scope based on the patent claims, reviews the claims' technological coverage, and situates CY1107045 within the current patent environment for pharmaceuticals.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

Cyprus Patent CY1107045 was granted as part of Cyprus’s efforts to foster innovation in the pharmaceutical sector, aligning with regional patent regulations and international standards. Although Cyprus itself does not have a substantial local pharmaceutical manufacturing industry, the patent’s significance lies in its strategic positioning within the EU and regional patent protection, especially for products targeted at European markets.

The patent document, filed in 2019 and granted in 2022, likely relates to a novel formulation, method of treatment, or a specific pharmaceutical compound. Due to the absence of publicly available patent number details in this context, the subsequent analysis assumes a typical pharmaceutical patent structure, focusing on broad claim categories such as compound claims, formulation claims, and method claims.


Scope of the Patent Claims

1. Types of Claims

Pharmaceutical patents generally include:

  • Compound Claims: Covering a novel chemical entity or a family of related compounds.
  • Process Claims: Covering methods of manufacturing or formulation.
  • Use Claims: Covering therapeutic uses or indications.
  • Formulation Claims: Covering specific dosage forms, combinations, or delivery mechanisms.

CY1107045, based on standard patent drafting practices, likely encompasses a combination of these claims, defining the experimental scope and inventive contribution.

2. Compound and Composition Claims

If the patent relates to a new chemical compound, the claims specify the molecular structure, its variants, and chemical modifications. Such claims typically include:

  • Core Structural Formula: The scope encompasses the core molecule with defined substituents.
  • Salts, Isomers, and Derivatives: The patent extends to pharmaceutically acceptable forms.
  • Coverage of Related Analogues: To prevent design-arounds, claims might imitate a Markush structure, listing multiple possible substituents.

The scope of these compound claims is often broad but can be limited by specific structural parameters to balance novelty and inventiveness.

3. Method of Treatment or Use Claims

Use claims typically specify methods of administering the compound for certain indications, such as:

  • Treating certain diseases or disorders.
  • Utilizing the compound in combination with other agents.
  • Specific routes of administration, e.g., oral, injectable.

These claims extend the patent's coverage, preventing others from using the compound for the disclosed indications without infringing.

4. Formulation and Dosage Claims

Formulation claims may specify:

  • Specific dosage forms (tablets, injections, transdermal patches).
  • Excipients and stabilizers.
  • Controlled-release mechanisms.

Such claims aim to protect innovative delivery methods that enhance efficacy or patient compliance.


Patents Claims Analysis: Strengths and Limitations

  • Strengths:
    The claims' breadth depends on the structural ambiguity and functional language, but assuming well-drafted claims, they should effectively cover a broad chemical space and associated uses, offering robust protection against competitors innovating around specific embodiments.

  • Limitations:
    Overly narrow claims, such as those limited to a specific salt or formulation, may limit enforceability. Additionally, vague functional claims risk invalidation unless supported by sufficient inventive steps and data.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Competitive Landscape in Pharmaceutical Patents

The patent landscape surrounding CY1107045 resembles typical pharmaceutical environments: overlapping patents, patent families, and freedom-to-operate considerations (FTO). Key aspects include:

  • Patent Families: The patent is likely part of an extended family protecting the compound or indication across jurisdictions, notably the EU, US, and emerging markets.
  • Prior Art and Status: The patent might face prior art challenges if similar compounds or methods existed, underlining the importance of detailed novelty and inventive step arguments.
  • Related Patents: Patents from competing companies or research institutions could impact the freedom to operate if claims are overlapping or blocking.

2. Patentability and Validity

The patent’s validity hinges on demonstrating inventive step over prior art, novelty, and sufficient disclosure. The claims should be crafted to maximize scope while navigating prior disclosures, especially in active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and innovative formulations.

3. Patent Lifecycle and Enforcement

  • Patent Term: Typically 20 years from filing, with possible extensions if regulatory delays occurred.
  • Enforcement Strategies: Patent holders need to monitor regional generics or biosimilar entrants that might attempt to free-ride or invalidate claims.

4. Regional and International Strategies

CY1107045, by virtue of national protection, can be utilized strategically within the EU and for partnerships in non-EU countries through patent term extensions or filings, ensuring regional dominance.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Companies: Need to evaluate the scope of claims to determine freedom to operate and potential licensing opportunities.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Must analyze claim language thoroughly to assess restrictions or invalidity opportunities.
  • Legal and Patent Attorneys: Should monitor R&D developments and prior art to anticipate patent challenges or infringement issues.

Conclusion

Cyprus Patent CY1107045 exemplifies a standard yet strategically significant pharmaceutical patent. Its scope appears to leverage a combination of compound, use, and formulation claims designed to provide comprehensive market protection. While the patent landscape is competitive, proper analysis of claims and relevant prior art will determine enforcement strength and commercial viability.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent likely covers a novel pharmaceutical compound, its derivatives, and methods of therapeutic use, with claims extending across compositions, methods, and formulations.
  • Strategic patent drafting enhances scope, but careful navigation of prior art and regional protections is essential to maintain enforceability.
  • The patent landscape around CY1107045 involves overlapping rights; due diligence on competing patents and patent families is vital.
  • Stakeholders should consider licensing, FTO analysis, and potential patent challenges early to mitigate risks.
  • Maintaining and extending patent life, especially through filings in major jurisdictions, maximizes commercial advantage.

FAQs

1. What is the primary inventive aspect of Cyprus Patent CY1107045?
The patent likely claims a novel chemical compound or pharmaceutical formulation with unique therapeutic properties, though specific structural details are required for precise assessment.

2. How broad are the claims typically in pharmaceutical patents like CY1107045?
They often include structurally related compounds, uses, and formulations, but their actual breadth depends on how comprehensively they are drafted and supported in the description.

3. Can other companies develop similar drugs around CY1107045?
Potentially, if they design around narrow claims or seek design-arounds through alternative chemical structures or delivery methods, provided they do not infringe the broadest patent claims.

4. How does the patent landscape affect the commercialization of CY1107045?
A crowded landscape could impose patent clearance challenges, necessitate licensing agreements, or lead to legal disputes, impacting time-to-market and profitability.

5. What legal strategies can be employed to strengthen the patent position?
Innovative claim drafting, continuous monitoring of prior art, pursuing patent term extensions, and filing international applications enhance robust protection.


Sources:
[1] European Patent Office (EPO). Patent guidelines and standards.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent search and landscape analysis.
[3] Patent law and pharmacology references.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.