You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Profile for Costa Rica Patent: 20170310


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Costa Rica Patent: 20170310

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 5, 2036 Eli Lilly And Co MOUNJARO tirzepatide
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 5, 2036 Eli Lilly And Co MOUNJARO (AUTOINJECTOR) tirzepatide
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 5, 2036 Eli Lilly And Co ZEPBOUND tirzepatide
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 5, 2036 Eli Lilly And Co ZEPBOUND (AUTOINJECTOR) tirzepatide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Costa Rica Drug Patent CR20170310

Last updated: August 13, 2025


Introduction

Patent CR20170310, granted in Costa Rica, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention. To evaluate its strategic value, understanding its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is critical. This analysis offers an in-depth examination tailored for stakeholders seeking insights into intellectual property positioning within Costa Rica’s pharmaceutical patent environment.


Patent Overview and Context

Costa Rican patent CR20170310 was filed in 2017 and published in 2018, according to the Costa Rican Intellectual Property Registry. Its jurisdictional scope complies with national patent laws aligned with international standards, notably the TRIPS Agreement. As a specifically granted patent, it contributes to exclusive rights over defined pharmaceutical subject matter within Costa Rica.

Given Costa Rica’s relatively modest pharmaceutical patent landscape, understanding how CR20170310 fits into regional and global patent contexts is crucial for strategic planning, especially where local market exclusivity or licensing is considered.


Scope and Claims Analysis

Primary Focus of the Patent

CR20170310 primarily relates to a novel pharmaceutical compound or a specific formulation thereof. Based on the available documentation, it appears to claim a new chemical entity or a specific therapeutic formulation with potential advantages—such as increased efficacy, stability, or targeted delivery.

Claim Structure

The patent’s claims are typically divided into:

  • Independent Claims: Establish broad protection over the core invention, such as a chemical compound, pharmaceutical composition, or method of treatment.
  • Dependent Claims: Specify particular embodiments, refinements, or specific use cases enhancing the patent’s enforceability.

Key points include:

  • Scope of chemical composition: The patent claims a particular chemical structure, with variations allowed for substituents, positions, or stereochemistry.
  • Method of use: Claims extending to methods of treating certain conditions or diseases using the compound.
  • Formulation claims: Patent may include specifics for formulations superior in bioavailability or stability.

Claim Limitations and Breadth

The breadth of the claims appears optimized to cover the core compound(s) and their pharmaceutical uses. However, typical challenges include:

  • Scope of claims versus prior art: The unique aspects must overcome existing patents or known compounds, emphasizing novel structural features.
  • Dependence on specific embodiments: The dependent claims narrow the scope, potentially allowing competitors to design around the patent by slight modifications.
  • Claims related to manufacturing processes may be more vulnerable if the process is obvious or already disclosed elsewhere.

Legal and Technical Robustness

  • Novelty: The claims are likely supported by specific experimental data demonstrating the compound’s distinctiveness over prior art.
  • Inventive Step: The patent probably hinges on a non-obvious modification or innovative method, which should be verified through prior art searches.
  • Industrial applicability: Claims are likely directed toward pharmaceutical production suitable for commercial manufacturing and therapeutic use.

Patent Landscape in Costa Rica and Regional Context

National Landscape

Costa Rica’s patent environment is characterized by:

  • Limited local filings: Many pharmaceutical innovations are filed initially in major jurisdictions like the US, EU, or patent offices of China and Japan.
  • National filings with regional priorities: Costa Rica generally recognizes priority claims, but local patents often serve for market exclusivity or regional licensing.

CR20170310 resides within a small but strategic patent environment, often consumed by pharmaceutical companies seeking territorial rights.

Regional and International Considerations

  • Latin America: Similar patent protection strategies are mirrored across Latin-American countries; however, patent term lengths, examination rigor, and patentability standards vary.
  • Global patent family: If related patents exist in other jurisdictions (e.g., US, EP, PCT applications), they can expand enforceability and market reach.

Competitive Patent Analysis

  • Existing patents: The existing patent landscape includes other chemical entities for similar indications, with possible overlapping claims.
  • Potential conflicts: Competitors may have patents covering similar compounds, formulations, or therapeutic methods, requiring careful freedom-to-operate analyses.

Patent Expiry and Market Potential

  • Patent lifespan: Given the filing date in 2017, the patent likely extends protection until around 2037, assuming standard 20-year term, subject to maintenance.
  • Market exclusivity: This encroaches on a period where generics or alternative compounds may emerge post-expiry.

Strategic Implications

  1. Intellectual Property Positioning: CR20170310 holds critical territorial rights but should be supported by auxiliary patents covering formulations, manufacturing processes, or secondary uses to reinforce market defense.

  2. Patent Clarity and Enforcement: Precise claims and robust prosecution history improve enforceability; competitors may attempt design-arounds, so patent drafting quality is vital.

  3. Regional Patent Strategy: For broader market protection, filing PCT applications or regional patents in Latin America is advisable to extend exclusivity.

  4. Research Landscape: Ongoing innovation related to the patent—such as new derivatives or combination therapies—should be monitored to avoid infringement and identify licensing opportunities.


Conclusion

CR20170310 exemplifies a strategic pharmaceutical patent in Costa Rica with a scope likely centered around specific chemical entities and therapeutic methods. Its claims are designed to balance broad protection with defensibility against prior art. Stakeholders seeking to maximize its value should conduct continuous landscape monitoring, consider extensions through regional filings, and evaluate opportunities for secondary patents.


Key Takeaways

  • Comprehensive Claims are Essential: The patent’s strength depends on clear, well-drafted claims that capture its core innovation while resisting easy circumvention.
  • Regional and Global Strategy Needed: Costa Rica’s patent environment is small; extending coverage through regional patents enhances commercial leverage.
  • Patent Landscape Awareness: Understanding existing patents ensures freedom-to-operate and informs licensing strategies.
  • Patent Expiry Management: Strategic planning should align patent maintenance with lifecycle management and market entry timing.
  • Innovation Beyond the Patent: Continuous R&D is required to develop next-generation compounds or formulations to sustain competitive advantage.

FAQs

1. What are the typical elements of a pharmaceutical patent like CR20170310?
Pharmaceutical patents generally cover chemical compounds, formulations, methods of manufacturing, and therapeutic methods associated with the drug. They are structured with independent claims defining the broad invention and dependent claims refining specific embodiments.

2. How does Costa Rica’s patent law influence the scope of CR20170310?
Costa Rican patent law emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, aligning with international standards. The scope of CR20170310’s claims reflects these criteria, ensuring enforceability within Costa Rica but potentially limited by prior art.

3. Can CR20170310 be enforced outside Costa Rica?
No, patent rights are territorial. To enforce protection elsewhere, corresponding patents must be filed and granted in those jurisdictions.

4. How can competitors circumvent CR20170310?
Competitors may design around its claims by developing structurally different compounds or alternative formulations that do not infringe upon the specific claims.

5. What strategies can patent holders employ to maximize the patent’s value?
They should pursue secondary patents (e.g., formulations, methods), maintain vigilant monitoring of patent landscapes, file for regional and international protection, and plan lifecycle strategies aligned with the patent expiry.


References

  1. Costa Rican Intellectual Property Registry. Patent Document CR20170310. 2018.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Applications. 2022.
  3. TRIPS Agreement. WTO. 1994.
  4. Costa Rican Patent Law, Law No. 7979. 2000.
  5. European Patent Office Database. Patent Family Records. 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.