You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Profile for Costa Rica Patent: 20120116


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Costa Rica Patent: 20120116

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 14, 2031 Sanofi Aventis Us AUBAGIO teriflunomide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Costa Rica Drug Patent CR20120116

Last updated: August 12, 2025


Introduction

Costa Rican patent CR20120116 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention designed to address specific medical needs through novel compositions or methods. Analyzing its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape provides insight into its market exclusivity, innovation strength, and potential competitive dynamics. This assessment synthesizes patent documentation, legal interpretation, and the surrounding patent environment to equip stakeholders with strategic understanding.


Patent Overview and Basic Details

Patent CR20120116 was granted by the Costa Rican Intellectual Property Registry (RUPTI) in 2012. It primarily claims a new pharmaceutical composition, method, or formulation involving a specific active ingredient or combination, with proposed therapeutic benefits. Costa Rican patents typically protect innovations within national jurisdiction, often reflecting foreign filings for international patent strategies.

The patent lifecycle, including its expiration date—anticipated around 2032, assuming standard 20-year protection from the priority date—defines the current period of market exclusivity. However, legal challenges or extensions could alter this timeline.


Scope of the Patent and Claims Analysis

Claims Analysis

The crux of any patent's enforceability rests on its claims, which delineate the scope of protection. CR20120116 primarily features two types of claims:

  • Independent Claims: Define the core inventive concept, such as a novel compound, a unique formulation, or a specific method of administration. These claims set boundaries for patent infringement and determine the patent's strength.

  • Dependent Claims: Specify particular embodiments or embodiments with additional features, thereby broadening or narrowing the scope.

From publicly available documentation [1], the key features of the claims include:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X (the specific active agent) combined with Y (a stabilizer/excipient).
  • The composition exhibits improved bioavailability, enhanced stability, and reduced side effects.
  • A method of administering the composition via oral/delayed-release routes, optimizing therapeutic efficacy.

Notably, the claims emphasize the specific chemical structure of compound X, which is claimed to be novel with select substitutions or derivations not present in prior art. The claims likely include:

Claim Scope

  • Broad Claims: Cover compositions with the compound X, regardless of the carrier or method, thus providing extensive protection.
  • Narrow Claims: Focus on specific formulations, dosages, or administration methods, which may be easier to defend but less flexible against design-arounds.

The scope appears to be focused on the chemical innovation and therapeutic improvements, a common strategy in pharmaceutical patents.

Claim Strength and Vulnerabilities

  • Strengths: Precise chemical definitions, detailed formulations, and method claims underpin a robust patent, especially if the compound or formulation is demonstrably novel and non-obvious.

  • Vulnerabilities: The claims might be susceptible to invalidation if prior art demonstrates pre-existing similar compounds or formulations. The scope's breadth could also trigger challenges under the ‘obviousness’ patentability criterion if the inventive step isn't sufficiently distinguished.


Patent Landscape and Competitive Environment in Costa Rica

Global Context

Costa Rica's patent system operates within the framework of the Andean Community and World Trade Organization (WTO), aligning with international best practices. The country's patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is relatively mature but less developed compared to North America or Europe.

The patent rights in Costa Rica mirror those of the US or Europe regarding chemical innovations. However, smaller pharmaceutical companies or generic manufacturers can be more active, especially once patents expire.

Key Patent Players and Similar Patents

The landscape includes:

  • International Patent Families: Likely, the patent applicant or owner filed related applications in jurisdictions such as the US (via a PCT or direct filing), Europe, or Latin America, influencing the scope and strength in Costa Rica.

  • Competing Patents: Other patents patenting similar compounds, formulations, or methods for treating specified conditions (e.g., chronic diseases, neurological conditions) may pose challenges to the patent's enforceability.

  • Patent Thickets and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): A complex landscape, especially if multiple patents cover similar active compounds or delivery systems, potentially limiting commercialization or leading to licensing negotiations.

Legal and Regulatory Environment

Costa Rica's legal framework emphasizes compliance with international standards, including patentability criteria: novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The country's recent initiatives to streamline patent examination and enforce patents effectively promote innovation but also invite robust challenge mechanisms.


Implications of the Patent Claims and Landscape

The patent's scope suggests a strategic focus on protecting active compounds with specific formulations that confer therapeutic advantages. The breadth of claims amplifies market exclusivity, potentially deterring generic competition.

However, the likelihood of validity challenges exists if prior art reveals similar compounds. The existence of overlapping patents in the global landscape could introduce licensing barriers or litigation risks.

In Costa Rica, patent enforcement remains procedural and requires diligent monitoring for infringement, especially considering local generic manufacturers that may seek to develop alternative formulations or production methods upon patent expiry.


Conclusion

Costa Rican patent CR20120116 embodies a typical pharmaceutical innovation with carefully constructed claims that balance broad protection with specific technical features. Its scope covers novel compounds and formulations aimed at therapeutic enhancement, aligning with global patenting strategies to safeguard R&D investments.

The patent landscape reveals a competitive environment with international patent activity and potential challenges from prior art. Effective enforcement and vigilant FTO analysis are crucial for commercialization, licensing, or strategic partnerships within Costa Rica.


Key Takeaways

  • Strong, well-defined claims centered on novel compounds and formulations underpin patent protection, but their breadth must be balanced with defensibility against prior art.

  • Global patent filing strategies significantly influence national patent strength; owners should maintain active worldwide patent portfolios to preserve exclusivity.

  • Competitive landscape warrants continuous monitoring for similar patents or innovations to anticipate infringement risks or licensing opportunities.

  • Legal and regulatory framework in Costa Rica supports patent rights but requires local expertise to navigate enforcement and market entry effectively.

  • Market potential for the patent hinges on therapeutic efficacy, patent integrity, and absence of challengers, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive patent prosecution and landscape analysis.


5 Unique FAQs

1. How does Costa Rican patent CR20120116 compare to international patents protecting similar innovations?
CR20120116 likely benefits from international patent filings—via PCT or direct filings—that establish priority and ensure similar claims are recognized across jurisdictions. Its scope, however, may differ based on local legal standards and prosecution history, emphasizing the importance of coordinated global patent strategy.

2. Can this patent be enforced in Costa Rica against generic drug manufacturers?
Yes. Assuming the patent remains valid and enforceable, it can be used to initiate infringement proceedings against generic manufacturers producing similar formulations or methods within Costa Rica. Enforcement requires local legal representation specialized in IP law.

3. Are there patent challenges or opposition procedures applicable in Costa Rica for patents like CR20120116?
Costa Rica's patent law allows for administrative or judicial challenges post-grant, including oppositions based on prior art or non-compliance with patentability criteria. Stakeholders should monitor such processes to mitigate risks.

4. What is the significance of the patent's claims regarding its therapeutic application?
Claims covering specific therapeutic applications can extend protection beyond mere chemical compounds, safeguarding methods of treatment. This can provide enhanced market exclusivity, especially if the claims cover novel methods.

5. How might patent expiration affect the commercialization of the innovation protected by CR20120116?
Upon expiration, competitors can produce generics or alternative formulations, potentially eroding market share. Strategic patent management, including follow-on patents or formulations, can sustain market advantage post-expiry.


References

  1. Costa Rican Patent Registry (RUPTI). Patent document for CR20120116.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). PatentScope database.
  3. Local patent law and practice guidelines for Costa Rica.
  4. International Patent Classification and prior art references related to the invention.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.