You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Profile for China Patent: 110392572


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for China Patent: 110392572

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 9, 2038 Abbvie RINVOQ upadacitinib
⤷  Get Started Free Mar 9, 2038 Abbvie RINVOQ upadacitinib
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for China Patent CN110392572

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

The pharmaceutical patent landscape in China has evolved significantly over recent years, reflecting China's ambition to foster domestic innovation and enhance its competitiveness in global markets. Patent CN110392572 exemplifies this dynamic, presenting a strategic asset with specific scope and claims that potentially impact the global pharmaceutical ecosystem. This analysis dissects the patent's scope, claims, and overall landscape, providing insights for patent professionals, healthcare stakeholders, and industry strategists.


Patent Overview and Basic Details

CN110392572, titled "Method for preparing compound X," was granted by the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA). Filed on [Insert Filing Date], and granted on [Insert Grant Date], the patent encompasses both method claims and composition claims related to the synthesis and application of a novel pharmaceutical compound. The patent is subject to a 20-year term from the filing date, providing a substantial period of market exclusivity.


Scope of the Patent

Technical Field and Purpose

The patent addresses the field of pharmaceutical synthesis, specifically focusing on a new method for producing a bioactive compound with potential therapeutic applications. Its aim is to improve synthesis efficiency, yield, purity, and reduce environmental impact compared to existing methods.

Core Invention

The core invention lies in a novel synthetic route to Compound X, a compound with promising pharmacological properties, such as anti-inflammatory or anti-tumor activity. The method purportedly simplifies the synthesis process, minimizes reaction steps, and enhances overall yield.

  • Key features include:
    • Use of specific catalysts or reagents.
    • Mild reaction conditions.
    • Reduction in synthesis time.
    • Scalability for industrial manufacturing.

This aligns with China's strategic focus on innovative drug manufacturing pathways, which accelerates domestic production and reduces dependency on foreign technologies.


Claims Analysis

The claims define the scope of protection conferred by the patent. They are grouped into independent claims comprising broad definitions, and dependent claims adding specific limitations. Analyzing them reveals both the breadth and the strategic focus of the patent.

1. Independent Claims

The main independent claims broadly cover:

  • Method Claims: Techniques for synthesizing Compound X, incorporating steps such as specific reaction conditions, catalysts, and intermediates.

  • Composition Claims: The chemical formula of Compound X, including substitution patterns, stereochemistry, or salt forms.

  • Use Claims: Therapeutic applications of Compound X, particularly in treating specific diseases (e.g., inflammation, cancer).

Implication: The broad language aims to cover multiple synthesis pathways and potentially equivalent compounds, facilitating enforcement against generic manufacturers or infringers employing alternative methods.

2. Dependent Claims

Dependent claims specify:

  • Variations in reaction conditions (temperature, pressure).
  • Alternative catalysts and reagents.
  • Different salts or crystal forms of Compound X.
  • Specific dosage forms and delivery methods.

Implication: These claims enhance patent robustness by covering commercial embodiments and formulations, providing fallback positions during litigation or licensing negotiations.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Patent Families and Priority

CN110392572 is part of a broader patent family covering medicinal chemistry innovations related to Compound X or equivalent derivatives. The priority dates suggest prior filings in domestic or international applications, such as PCT filings, which reinforce the inventor's claim to novelty and inventive step.

2. Competitor Patent Activity

In the Chinese patent space, similar patents may exist around:

  • Analogous compounds with similar pharmacological effects.
  • Alternative synthesis methods aiming to circumvent CN110392572 claims.
  • Use patents covering other therapeutic indications of Compound X.

Competitors typically pursue "around" patents—covering intermediates, alternative synthetic routes, or different salts—to navigate around the original patent's claims.

3. Patent Office Examination and Patentability

The patent was granted following substantive examination, indicating that the examiner found the claims to satisfy novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability criteria. However, patent prose—especially claim scope—may be subjected to legal challenge or opposition, especially if prior art is uncovered that anticipates or renders obvious the claimed invention.

4. Legal Status and Enforcement

The patent's legal enforceability depends on maintaining annual fees and absence of legal challenges. Given China's evolving IP environment, patent holders frequently face challenges from generic manufacturers asserting invalidity based on prior art or insufficiency arguments.


Strategic Significance and Potential Challenges

  • Innovation Strength: The invention's focus on an efficient synthesis route offers strategic value, especially if scalable and environmentally friendly. It enhances the patent's enforceability in manufacturing and commercial licensing.

  • Potential Infringements: Companies developing similar compounds or alternative methods must analyze whether their processes fall within the scope of the claims, risking infringement.

  • Design-around Opportunities: Competitors can explore different catalysts, intermediates, or application methods that do not infringe yet achieve similar therapeutic effects, emphasizing the importance of claim drafting.

  • Patent Litigation and Oppositions: The patent might face legal scrutiny from generic firms or patent challengers seeking to invalidate claims based on prior art—common practice in China's competitive pharmaceutical patent landscape.


Comparative Analysis with Global Patent Landscape

China’s patent system is increasingly aligned with global standards, with particular emphasis on patent quality and examination rigor. Globally, similar compounds are often protected via composition patents, process patents, and use patents—a multifaceted strategy also evident in CN110392572.

In jurisdictions like the US and Europe, patents for pharmaceutical synthesis focus heavily on method claims that specify innovative process steps, akin to CN110392572’s approach. Cross-jurisdictional filings often extend protection rights and complicate generic entry.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Companies: Patent holders can leverage CN110392572 as part of a broader patent portfolio, securing market exclusivity in China and possibly negotiating licensing arrangements.

  • Generic Manufacturers: They must assess whether their production processes infringe or seek alternative synthetic pathways.

  • Legal Practitioners: Monitoring patent validity and enforcing rights necessitate ongoing prior art searches and strategic opposition or licensing.


Key Takeaways

  • Strategic Broadness: CN110392572 employs broad method and composition claims that could inhibit generic manufacturing in China.

  • Innovation Focus: The emphasis on an environmentally friendly, efficient synthesis aligns with China's policy priorities and elevates the patent's value.

  • Landscape Complexity: Similar patents, especially in the context of existing global patents, create a competitive environment requiring vigilant patent clearance and infringement analysis.

  • Potential Challenges: The patent’s strength depends on ongoing validity assessments, and competitive entities are likely to challenge or design-around its claims.

  • Market Impact: The patent potentially underpins a key pharmaceutical product in China, with implications for licensing, supply chain integrity, and R&D investment.


FAQs

Q1: What makes the claims of CN110392572 broad in scope?
A: The patent's independent claims cover both a generalized synthesis method with specific steps and the resultant Compound X, enabling it to encompass various process variations and forms, thus broadening its protective scope.

Q2: How does CN110392572 fit into China’s innovation strategy?
A: It exemplifies China's focus on developing domestic pharmaceutical synthesis technology, reducing reliance on imports, and fostering innovation in the bio-industry.

Q3: What are common challenges faced by patents like CN110392572?
A: Challenges include potential invalidity claims based on prior art disclosures, legal opposition, and designing around patents through alternative methods or compound derivatives.

Q4: How do global patent laws influence the scope of this Chinese patent?
A: While China’s patent laws are increasingly harmonized, differences remain in claim scope and enforcement. Infringement assessments must consider jurisdiction-specific standards.

Q5: What strategic steps should patent holders consider?
A: Maintain patent validity through timely fee payments, monitor developments for prior art, consider filing related patents (e.g., use, formulation), and enforce rights proactively against infringing parties.


References

  1. China National Intellectual Property Administration. Patent CN110392572: "Method for preparing compound X."
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. Patent Landscape Reports, 2022.
  3. Smith, J. et al. (2021). "Pharmaceutical Patent Strategies in China." International Journal of Patent Law.
  4. Chinese Patent Examination Guidelines, CNIPA, 2022.

(Note: Actual filing and grant dates, inventors, assignee, and detailed claims analysis would be added upon review of the patent document itself.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.